An evidence based hypothesis on the existence of two pathways of mitochondrial crista formation

  1. Max E Harner  Is a corresponding author
  2. Ann-Katrin Unger
  3. Willie JC Geerts
  4. Muriel Mari
  5. Toshiaki Izawa
  6. Maria Stenger
  7. Stefan Geimer
  8. Fulvio Reggiori
  9. Benedikt Westermann
  10. Walter Neupert  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany
  2. Universität Bayreuth, Germany
  3. Universiteit Utrecht, Netherlands
  4. University of Groningen, Netherlands

Abstract

Metabolic function and architecture of mitochondria are intimately linked. More than 60 years ago, cristae were discovered as characteristic elements of mitochondria that harbor the protein complexes of oxidative phosphorylation, but how cristae are formed, remained an open question. Here we present experimental results obtained with yeast that support a novel hypothesis on the existence of two molecular pathways that lead to generation of lamellar and tubular cristae. Formation of lamellar cristae depends on the mitochondrial fusion machinery through a pathway that is required also for homeostasis of mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA. Tubular cristae are formed via invaginations of the inner boundary membrane by a pathway independent of the fusion machinery. Dimerization of the F1FO-ATP synthase and presence of the MICOS complex are necessary for both pathways. The proposed hypothesis is suggested to apply also to higher eukaryotes, since the key components are conserved in structure and function throughout evolution.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Max E Harner

    Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    max.harner@med.uni-muenchen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ann-Katrin Unger

    Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Willie JC Geerts

    Biomolecular Imaging, Bijvoet Center, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Muriel Mari

    Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Toshiaki Izawa

    Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maria Stenger

    Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Stefan Geimer

    Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fulvio Reggiori

    Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Benedikt Westermann

    Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2991-1604
  10. Walter Neupert

    Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    Neupert@biochem.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0571-4419

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Max E Harner
  • Ann-Katrin Unger
  • Toshiaki Izawa
  • Walter Neupert

Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung

  • Walter Neupert

Jung-Stiftung für Wissenschaft und Forschung

  • Max E Harner

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

  • Max E Harner

Netherlands organization for Scientific Research (DN82-303)

  • Fulvio Reggiori

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DN82-303)

  • Fulvio Reggiori

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CRSII3_154421)

  • Fulvio Reggiori

ZonMw (ZonMW VICI)

  • Fulvio Reggiori

Netherlands organization for Scientific Research (822.02.014)

  • Fulvio Reggiori

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Harner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,861
    views
  • 954
    downloads
  • 80
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Max E Harner
  2. Ann-Katrin Unger
  3. Willie JC Geerts
  4. Muriel Mari
  5. Toshiaki Izawa
  6. Maria Stenger
  7. Stefan Geimer
  8. Fulvio Reggiori
  9. Benedikt Westermann
  10. Walter Neupert
(2016)
An evidence based hypothesis on the existence of two pathways of mitochondrial crista formation
eLife 5:e18853.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18853

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18853

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Gabriella O Estevam, Edmond Linossi ... James S Fraser
    Research Article

    Mutations in the kinase and juxtamembrane domains of the MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase are responsible for oncogenesis in various cancers and can drive resistance to MET-directed treatments. Determining the most effective inhibitor for each mutational profile is a major challenge for MET-driven cancer treatment in precision medicine. Here, we used a deep mutational scan (DMS) of ~5764 MET kinase domain variants to profile the growth of each mutation against a panel of 11 inhibitors that are reported to target the MET kinase domain. We validate previously identified resistance mutations, pinpoint common resistance sites across type I, type II, and type I ½ inhibitors, unveil unique resistance and sensitizing mutations for each inhibitor, and verify non-cross-resistant sensitivities for type I and type II inhibitor pairs. We augment a protein language model with biophysical and chemical features to improve the predictive performance for inhibitor-treated datasets. Together, our study demonstrates a pooled experimental pipeline for identifying resistance mutations, provides a reference dictionary for mutations that are sensitized to specific therapies, and offers insights for future drug development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.