Cilia-mediated Hedgehog signaling controls form and function in the mammalian larynx

  1. Jacqueline M Tabler
  2. Maggie M Rigney
  3. Gordon J Berman
  4. Swetha Gopalakrishnan
  5. Eglantine Heude
  6. Hadeel Adel Al-Lami
  7. Basil Z Yannakoudakis
  8. Rebecca D Fitch
  9. Christopher M Carter
  10. Steven A Vokes
  11. Karen J Liu
  12. Shahragim Tajbakhsh
  13. SE Roian Egnor
  14. John B Wallingford  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas at Austin, United States
  2. Emory University, United States
  3. CNRS UMR3738, Institut Pasteur, France
  4. King's College London, United Kingdom
  5. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States

Abstract

Acoustic communication is fundamental to social interactions among animals, including humans. In fact, deficits in voice impair the quality of life for a large and diverse population of patients. Understanding the molecular genetic mechanisms of development and function in the vocal apparatus is thus an important challenge with relevance both to the basic biology of animal communication and to biomedicine. However, surprisingly little is known about the developmental biology of the mammalian larynx. Here, we used genetic fate mapping to chart the embryological origins of the tissues in the mouse larynx, and we describe the developmental etiology of laryngeal defects in mice with disruptions in cilia-mediated Hedgehog signaling. In addition, we show that mild laryngeal defects correlate with changes in the acoustic structure of vocalizations. Together, these data provide key new insights in the molecular genetics of form and function in the mammalian vocal apparatus.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jacqueline M Tabler

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Maggie M Rigney

    Department of Molecular Biosciencesc, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Gordon J Berman

    Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Swetha Gopalakrishnan

    Stem Cells and Development, CNRS UMR3738, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Eglantine Heude

    Stem Cells and Development, CNRS UMR3738, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hadeel Adel Al-Lami

    Department of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Basil Z Yannakoudakis

    Department of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rebecca D Fitch

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Christopher M Carter

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Steven A Vokes

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Karen J Liu

    Department of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shahragim Tajbakhsh

    Stem Cells and Development, CNRS UMR3738, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. SE Roian Egnor

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. John B Wallingford

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    For correspondence
    wallingford@austin.utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6280-8625

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • SE Roian Egnor
  • John B Wallingford

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This work was performed by protocols approved by UT Austin (IACUC protocol # AUP-2015-00105) and by King's College London (Animal Use Protocol PPL 70/7441).

Copyright

© 2017, Tabler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,786
    views
  • 791
    downloads
  • 71
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jacqueline M Tabler
  2. Maggie M Rigney
  3. Gordon J Berman
  4. Swetha Gopalakrishnan
  5. Eglantine Heude
  6. Hadeel Adel Al-Lami
  7. Basil Z Yannakoudakis
  8. Rebecca D Fitch
  9. Christopher M Carter
  10. Steven A Vokes
  11. Karen J Liu
  12. Shahragim Tajbakhsh
  13. SE Roian Egnor
  14. John B Wallingford
(2017)
Cilia-mediated Hedgehog signaling controls form and function in the mammalian larynx
eLife 6:e19153.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19153

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19153

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Igor Kondrychyn, Liqun He ... Li-Kun Phng
    Research Article

    Cell migration is a key process in the shaping and formation of tissues. During sprouting angiogenesis, endothelial tip cells invade avascular tissues by generating actomyosin-dependent forces that drive cell migration and vascular expansion. Surprisingly, endothelial cells (ECs) can still invade if actin polymerization is inhibited. In this study, we show that endothelial tip cells employ an alternative mechanism of cell migration that is dependent on Aquaporin (Aqp)-mediated water inflow and increase in hydrostatic pressure. In the zebrafish, ECs express aqp1a.1 and aqp8a.1 in newly formed vascular sprouts in a VEGFR2-dependent manner. Aqp1a.1 and Aqp8a.1 loss-of-function studies show an impairment in intersegmental vessels formation because of a decreased capacity of tip cells to increase their cytoplasmic volume and generate membrane protrusions, leading to delayed tip cell emergence from the dorsal aorta and slower migration. Further inhibition of actin polymerization resulted in a greater decrease in sprouting angiogenesis, indicating that ECs employ two mechanisms for robust cell migration in vivo. Our study thus highlights an important role of hydrostatic pressure in tissue morphogenesis.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Ruben Sebastian-Perez, Shoma Nakagawa ... Maria Pia Cosma
    Research Article

    Chromocenters are established after the 2-cell (2C) stage during mouse embryonic development, but the factors that mediate chromocenter formation remain largely unknown. To identify regulators of 2C heterochromatin establishment in mice, we generated an inducible system to convert embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to 2C-like cells. This conversion is marked by a global reorganization and dispersion of H3K9me3-heterochromatin foci, which are then reversibly formed upon re-entry into pluripotency. By profiling the chromatin-bound proteome (chromatome) through genome capture of ESCs transitioning to 2C-like cells, we uncover chromatin regulators involved in de novo heterochromatin formation. We identified TOPBP1 and investigated its binding partner SMARCAD1. SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 associate with H3K9me3-heterochromatin in ESCs. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of SMARCAD1 is lost in 2C-like cells. SMARCAD1 or TOPBP1 depletion in mouse embryos leads to developmental arrest, reduction of H3K9me3, and remodeling of heterochromatin foci. Collectively, our findings contribute to comprehending the maintenance of chromocenters during early development.