1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Plant Biology
Download icon

The MBD7 complex promotes expression of methylated transgenes without significantly altering their methylation status

  1. Dongming Li
  2. Ana Marie S Palanca
  3. So Youn Won
  4. Lei Gao
  5. Ying Feng
  6. Ajay A Vashisht
  7. Li Liu
  8. Yuanyuan Zhao
  9. Xigang Liu
  10. Xiuyun Wu
  11. Shaofang Li
  12. Brandon Le
  13. Yun Ju Kim
  14. Guodong Yang
  15. Shengben Li
  16. Jinyuan Liu
  17. James A Wohlschlegel
  18. Hongwei Guo
  19. Beixin Mo
  20. Xuemei Chen  Is a corresponding author
  21. Julie A Law  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Riverside, United States
  2. Salk Institute for Biological Studies, United States
  3. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea
  4. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, United States
  5. Tsinghua University, China
  6. Peking University, China
  7. Shenzhen University, China
Research Article
  • Cited 6
  • Views 2,312
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e19893 doi: 10.7554/eLife.19893

Abstract

DNA methylation is associated with gene silencing in eukaryotic organisms. Although pathways controlling the establishment, maintenance and removal of DNA methylation are known, relatively little is understood about how DNA methylation influences gene expression. Here we identified a METHYL-CpG-BINDING DOMAIN 7 (MBD7) complex in Arabidopsis thaliana that suppresses the transcriptional silencing of two LUCIFERASE (LUC) reporters via a mechanism that is largely downstream of DNA methylation. Although mutations in components of the MBD7 complex resulted in modest increases in DNA methylation concomitant with decreased LUC expression, we found that these hyper-methylation and gene expression phenotypes can be genetically uncoupled. This finding, along with genome-wide profiling experiments showing minimal changes in DNA methylation upon disruption of the MBD7 complex, places the MBD7 complex amongst a small number of factors acting downstream of DNA methylation. This complex, however, is unique as it functions to suppress, rather than enforce, DNA methylation-mediated gene silencing.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dongming Li

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Ana Marie S Palanca

    Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. So Youn Won

    National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Lei Gao

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Ying Feng

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Ajay A Vashisht

    Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Li Liu

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Yuanyuan Zhao

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Xigang Liu

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Xiuyun Wu

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Shaofang Li

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  12. Brandon Le

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  13. Yun Ju Kim

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  14. Guodong Yang

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  15. Shengben Li

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  16. Jinyuan Liu

    Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Protein Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  17. James A Wohlschlegel

    Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  18. Hongwei Guo

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene research, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  19. Beixin Mo

    College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  20. Xuemei Chen

    Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    For correspondence
    xuemei.chen@ucr.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5209-1157

  21. Julie A Law

    Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    jlaw@salk.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7472-7753

Funding

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF3046)

  • Xuemei Chen

National Science Foundation of China (91440105)

  • Xuemei Chen

National Science Foundation of China (30970265)

  • Beixin Mo

National Science Foundation of China (31210103901)

  • Beixin Mo

Guangdong Innovation Research Team Fund (2014ZT05S078)

  • Xuemei Chen

National Institutes of Health (GM061146)

  • Xuemei Chen

National Academy of Agricultural Science (PJ008725)

  • So Youn Won

China Scholarship Council

  • Dongming Li

Glenn Center for Aging Research at the Salk Institute

  • Ana Marie S Palanca

Helmsley Charitable Trust

  • Ana Marie S Palanca
  • Julie A Law

National Institutes of Health (GM112966)

  • Julie A Law

National Institutes of Health (GM089778)

  • James A Wohlschlegel

National Institutes of Health (P30 014195)

  • Ana Marie S Palanca
  • Julie A Law

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Steven Henikoff, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: July 25, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 24, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 28, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 7, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,312
    Page views
  • 683
    Downloads
  • 6
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    Repressing Ago2 mRNA translation by Trim71 maintains pluripotency through inhibiting let-7 microRNAs

    Qiuying Liu et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The regulation of stem cell fate is poorly understood. Genetic studies in Caenorhabditis elegans lead to the hypothesis that a conserved cytoplasmic double-negative feedback loop consisting of the RNA-binding protein Trim71 and the let-7 microRNA controls the pluripotency and differentiation of stem cells. Although let-7-microRNA-mediated inhibition of Trim71 promotes differentiation, whether and how Trim71 regulates pluripotency and inhibits the let-7 microRNA are still unknown. Here, we show that Trim71 represses Ago2 mRNA translation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Blocking this repression leads to a specific post-transcriptional increase of mature let-7 microRNAs, resulting in let-7-dependent stemness defects and accelerated differentiation in the stem cells. These results not only support the Trim71-let-7-microRNA bi-stable switch model in controlling stem cell fate, but also reveal that repressing the conserved pro-differentiation let-7 microRNAs at the mature microRNA level by Ago2 availability is critical to maintaining pluripotency.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    Dynamic effects of genetic variation on gene expression revealed following hypoxic stress in cardiomyocytes

    Michelle C Ward et al.
    Research Article Updated

    One life-threatening outcome of cardiovascular disease is myocardial infarction, where cardiomyocytes are deprived of oxygen. To study inter-individual differences in response to hypoxia, we established an in vitro model of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes from 15 individuals. We measured gene expression levels, chromatin accessibility, and methylation levels in four culturing conditions that correspond to normoxia, hypoxia, and short- or long-term re-oxygenation. We characterized thousands of gene regulatory changes as the cells transition between conditions. Using available genotypes, we identified 1,573 genes with a cis expression quantitative locus (eQTL) in at least one condition, as well as 367 dynamic eQTLs, which are classified as eQTLs in at least one, but not in all conditions. A subset of genes with dynamic eQTLs is associated with complex traits and disease. Our data demonstrate how dynamic genetic effects on gene expression, which are likely relevant for disease, can be uncovered under stress.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    A nuclease- and bisulfite-based strategy captures strand-specific R-loops genome-wide

    Phillip Wulfridge, Kavitha Sarma
    Tools and Resources

    R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures with essential roles in many nuclear processes. However, their unchecked accumulation is associated with genome instability and is observed in neurodevelopmental diseases and cancers. Genome-wide profiling of R-loops in normal and diseased cells can help identify locations of pathogenic R-loops and advance efforts to attenuate them. We present an antibody-independent R-loop detection strategy, BisMapR, that combines nuclease-based R-loop isolation with non-denaturing bisulfite chemistry to produce genome-wide profiles that retain strand information. BisMapR achieves greater resolution and is faster than existing strand-specific R-loop profiling strategies. In mouse embryonic stem cells, we apply BisMapR to find that gene promoters form R-loops in both directions and uncover a subset of active enhancers that, despite being bidirectionally transcribed, form R-loops exclusively on one strand. BisMapR reveals a previously unnoticed feature of active enhancers and provides a tool to systematically examine their mechanisms in gene expression.