Abstract

Molecule clustering is an important mechanism underlying cellular self-organization. In the cell membrane, a variety of fundamentally different mechanisms drive membrane protein clustering into nanometre-sized assemblies. To date, it is unknown whether this clustering process can be dissected into steps differentially regulated by independent mechanisms. Using clustered syntaxin molecules as an example, we study the influence of a cytoplasmic protein domain on the clustering behaviour. Analysing protein mobility, cluster size and accessibility to myc-epitopes we show that forces acting on the transmembrane segment produce loose-clusters, while cytoplasmic protein interactions mediate a tightly packed state. We conclude that the data identify a hierarchy in membrane protein clustering likely being a paradigm for many cellular self-organization processes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elisa Merklinger

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jan-Gero Schloetel

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pascal Weber

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Helena Batoulis

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sarah Holz

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nora Karnowski

    Chemical Biology, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jérôme Finke

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Thorsten Lang

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    thorsten.lang@uni-bonn.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9128-0137

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR83 to T.L.)

  • Thorsten Lang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Reinhard Jahn, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: August 16, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 17, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 31, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Merklinger et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,292
    views
  • 441
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elisa Merklinger
  2. Jan-Gero Schloetel
  3. Pascal Weber
  4. Helena Batoulis
  5. Sarah Holz
  6. Nora Karnowski
  7. Jérôme Finke
  8. Thorsten Lang
(2017)
The packing density of a supramolecular membrane protein cluster is controlled by cytoplasmic interactions
eLife 6:e20705.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20705

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20705

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.