Population scale mapping of transposable element diversity reveals links to gene regulation and epigenomic variation

  1. Tim Stuart
  2. Steven Eichten
  3. Jonathan Cahn
  4. Yuliya Karpievitch
  5. Justin Borevitz
  6. Ryan Lister  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Western Australia, Australia
  2. The Australian National University, Australia

Abstract

Variation in the presence or absence of transposable elements (TEs) is a major source of genetic variation between individuals. Here, we identified 23,095 TE presence/absence variants between 216 Arabidopsis accessions. Most TE variants were rare, and we find these rare variants associated with local extremes of gene expression and DNA methylation levels within the population. Of the common alleles identified, two thirds were not in linkage disequilibrium with nearby SNPs, implicating these variants as a source of novel genetic diversity. Many common TE variants were associated with significantly altered expression of nearby genes, and a major fraction of inter-accession DNA methylation differences were associated with nearby TE insertions. Overall, this demonstrates that TE variants are a rich source of genetic diversity that likely plays an important role in facilitating epigenomic and transcriptional differences between individuals, and indicates a strong genetic basis for epigenetic variation.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tim Stuart

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Steven Eichten

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2268-395X
  3. Jonathan Cahn

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5006-741X
  4. Yuliya Karpievitch

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Justin Borevitz

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ryan Lister

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    For correspondence
    ryan.lister@uwa.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6637-7239

Funding

Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Australian Research Council (CE140100008)

  • Tim Stuart
  • Steven Eichten
  • Jonathan Cahn
  • Yuliya Karpievitch
  • Justin Borevitz
  • Ryan Lister

Australian Research Council

  • Tim Stuart
  • Steven Eichten
  • Jonathan Cahn
  • Yuliya Karpievitch
  • Justin Borevitz
  • Ryan Lister

Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation

  • Ryan Lister

Australian Research Council (FT120100862)

  • Ryan Lister

Australian Research Council (DE150101206)

  • Steven Eichten

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Daniel Zilberman, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 18, 2016
  2. Accepted: December 1, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 2, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 19, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Stuart et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,599
    Page views
  • 1,183
    Downloads
  • 136
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tim Stuart
  2. Steven Eichten
  3. Jonathan Cahn
  4. Yuliya Karpievitch
  5. Justin Borevitz
  6. Ryan Lister
(2016)
Population scale mapping of transposable element diversity reveals links to gene regulation and epigenomic variation
eLife 5:e20777.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20777

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20777

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Allison Coté, Aoife O'Farrell ... Arjun Raj
    Research Article

    Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Maria L Adelus, Jiacheng Ding ... Casey E Romanoski
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) sub-phenotypes is becoming increasingly appreciated in atherosclerosis progression. Still, studies quantifying EC heterogeneity across whole transcriptomes and epigenomes in both in vitro and in vivo models are lacking. Multiomic profiling concurrently measuring transcriptomes and accessible chromatin in the same single cells was performed on six distinct primary cultures of human aortic ECs (HAECs) exposed to activating environments characteristic of the atherosclerotic microenvironment in vitro. Meta-analysis of single-cell transcriptomes across 17 human ex vivo arterial specimens was performed and two computational approaches quantitatively evaluated the similarity in molecular profiles between heterogeneous in vitro and ex vivo cell profiles. HAEC cultures were reproducibly populated by four major clusters with distinct pathway enrichment profiles and modest heterogeneous responses: EC1-angiogenic, EC2-proliferative, EC3-activated/mesenchymal-like, and EC4-mesenchymal. Quantitative comparisons between in vitro and ex vivo transcriptomes confirmed EC1 and EC2 as most canonically EC-like, and EC4 as most mesenchymal with minimal effects elicited by siERG and IL1B. Lastly, accessible chromatin regions unique to EC2 and EC4 were most enriched for coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), suggesting that these cell phenotypes harbor CAD-modulating mechanisms. Primary EC cultures contain markedly heterogeneous cell subtypes defined by their molecular profiles. Surprisingly, the perturbations used here only modestly shifted cells between subpopulations, suggesting relatively stable molecular phenotypes in culture. Identifying consistently heterogeneous EC subpopulations between in vitro and ex vivo models should pave the way for improving in vitro systems while enabling the mechanisms governing heterogeneous cell state decisions.