The dynamic assembly of distinct RNA polymerase I complexes modulates rDNA transcription

  1. Eva Torreira
  2. Jaime Alegrio Louro
  3. Irene Pazos
  4. Noelia González-Polo
  5. David Gil-Carton
  6. Ana Garcia Duran
  7. Sébastien Tosi
  8. Oriol Gallego  Is a corresponding author
  9. Olga Calvo  Is a corresponding author
  10. Carlos Fernández-Tornero  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Spain
  2. The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Spain
  3. Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica, Spain
  4. Cooperative Center for Research in Biosciences CIC bioGUNE, Spain

Abstract

Cell growth requires synthesis of ribosomal RNA by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). Binding of initiation factor Rrn3 activates Pol I, fostering recruitment to ribosomal DNA promoters. This fundamental process must be precisely regulated to satisfy cell needs at any time. We present in vivo evidence that, when growth is arrested by nutrient deprivation, cells induce rapid clearance of Pol I-Rrn3 complexes, followed by the assembly of inactive Pol I homodimers. This dual repressive mechanism reverts upon nutrient addition, thus restoring cell growth. Moreover, Pol I dimers also form after inhibition of either ribosome biogenesis or protein synthesis. Our mutational analysis, based on the electron cryomicroscopy structures of monomeric Pol I alone and in complex with Rrn3, underscores the central role of subunits A43 and A14 in the regulation of differential Pol I complexes assembly and subsequent promoter association.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eva Torreira

    Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jaime Alegrio Louro

    Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2800-923X
  3. Irene Pazos

    Institute for Research in Biomedicine, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Noelia González-Polo

    Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica, Salamanca, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Gil-Carton

    Structural Biology Unit, Cooperative Center for Research in Biosciences CIC bioGUNE, Derio, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ana Garcia Duran

    Institute for Research in Biomedicine, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sébastien Tosi

    Institute for Research in Biomedicine, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Oriol Gallego

    Institute for Research in Biomedicine, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    oriol.gallego@irbbarcelona.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Olga Calvo

    Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica, Salamanca, Spain
    For correspondence
    ocalvo@usal.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Carlos Fernández-Tornero

    Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Madrid, Spain
    For correspondence
    cftornero@cib.csic.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU2013-48374-P)

  • Carlos Fernández-Tornero

Fundación Ramón Areces (-)

  • Carlos Fernández-Tornero

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (RYC-2011-07967)

  • Oriol Gallego

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Alan G Hinnebusch, National Institutes of Health, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 21, 2016
  2. Accepted: March 6, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 6, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 8, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 22, 2017 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: March 24, 2017 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2017, Torreira et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,147
    views
  • 760
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eva Torreira
  2. Jaime Alegrio Louro
  3. Irene Pazos
  4. Noelia González-Polo
  5. David Gil-Carton
  6. Ana Garcia Duran
  7. Sébastien Tosi
  8. Oriol Gallego
  9. Olga Calvo
  10. Carlos Fernández-Tornero
(2017)
The dynamic assembly of distinct RNA polymerase I complexes modulates rDNA transcription
eLife 6:e20832.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20832

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20832

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Allison Coté, Aoife O'Farrell ... Arjun Raj
    Research Article

    Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Maria L Adelus, Jiacheng Ding ... Casey E Romanoski
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) sub-phenotypes is becoming increasingly appreciated in atherosclerosis progression. Still, studies quantifying EC heterogeneity across whole transcriptomes and epigenomes in both in vitro and in vivo models are lacking. Multiomic profiling concurrently measuring transcriptomes and accessible chromatin in the same single cells was performed on six distinct primary cultures of human aortic ECs (HAECs) exposed to activating environments characteristic of the atherosclerotic microenvironment in vitro. Meta-analysis of single-cell transcriptomes across 17 human ex vivo arterial specimens was performed and two computational approaches quantitatively evaluated the similarity in molecular profiles between heterogeneous in vitro and ex vivo cell profiles. HAEC cultures were reproducibly populated by four major clusters with distinct pathway enrichment profiles and modest heterogeneous responses: EC1-angiogenic, EC2-proliferative, EC3-activated/mesenchymal-like, and EC4-mesenchymal. Quantitative comparisons between in vitro and ex vivo transcriptomes confirmed EC1 and EC2 as most canonically EC-like, and EC4 as most mesenchymal with minimal effects elicited by siERG and IL1B. Lastly, accessible chromatin regions unique to EC2 and EC4 were most enriched for coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), suggesting that these cell phenotypes harbor CAD-modulating mechanisms. Primary EC cultures contain markedly heterogeneous cell subtypes defined by their molecular profiles. Surprisingly, the perturbations used here only modestly shifted cells between subpopulations, suggesting relatively stable molecular phenotypes in culture. Identifying consistently heterogeneous EC subpopulations between in vitro and ex vivo models should pave the way for improving in vitro systems while enabling the mechanisms governing heterogeneous cell state decisions.