Deletion of the MAD2L1 spindle assembly checkpoint gene is tolerated in mouse models of acute T-cell lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

  1. Floris Foijer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Lee A Albacker
  3. Bjorn Bakker
  4. Diana C Spierings
  5. Ying Yue
  6. Stephanie Z Xie
  7. Stephanie H Davis
  8. Annegret Lutum-Jehle
  9. Darin Takemoto
  10. Brian Hare
  11. Brinley Furey
  12. Roderick T Bronson
  13. Peter M Lansdorp
  14. Allan Bradley
  15. Peter K Sorger  Is a corresponding author
  1. University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. University Health Network, Canada
  4. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, United States
  5. BC Cancer Agency, Canada
  6. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

Chromosome instability (CIN) is deleterious to normal cells because of the burden of aneuploidy. However, most human solid tumors have an abnormal karyotype implying that gain and loss of chromosomes by cancer cells confers a selective advantage. CIN can be induced in the mouse by inactivating the spindle assembly checkpoint. This is lethal in the germline but we show here that adult T cells and hepatocytes can survive conditional inactivation of the Mad2l1 SAC gene and resulting CIN. This causes rapid onset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and progressive development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), both lethal diseases. The resulting DNA copy number variation and patterns of chromosome loss and gain are tumor-type specific, suggesting differential selective pressures on the two tumor cell types.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Albacker
    (2015) Cytogenetic aberrations in Hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE63100).
    1. Albacker
    (2015) Hepatocellular adenoma/carcinoma from Mad2 deficient hepatocytes
    Publicly available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession no: SRA191233).
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. National Cancer Institute
    (2017) TGCA
    https://cancergenome.nih.gov.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Floris Foijer

    European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    f.foijer@umcg.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0989-3127
  2. Lee A Albacker

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bjorn Bakker

    European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Diana C Spierings

    European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ying Yue

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stephanie Z Xie

    Princess Margaret and Toronto General Hospitals, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Stephanie H Davis

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0022-4210
  8. Annegret Lutum-Jehle

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Darin Takemoto

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Brian Hare

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Brinley Furey

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Roderick T Bronson

    Rodent Histopathology Core Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Peter M Lansdorp

    Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Allan Bradley

    Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Peter K Sorger

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    peter_sorger@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (CA084179)

  • Lee A Albacker
  • Ying Yue
  • Stephanie H Davis
  • Peter K Sorger

National Institute for Health Research (CA139980)

  • Lee A Albacker
  • Ying Yue
  • Stephanie H Davis
  • Peter K Sorger

KWF Kankerbestrijding (2012-RUG-5549)

  • Floris Foijer
  • Bjorn Bakker

H2020 European Research Council (ERC advanced ROOTS)

  • Diana C Spierings
  • Peter M Lansdorp

European Molecular Biology Organization (Longterm fellowship)

  • Floris Foijer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Angelika Amon, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animals were kept in pathogen-free housing under guidelines approved by the Center for Animal Resources and Comparative Medicine at Harvard Medical School or at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. Animal protocols were approved by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Medical School Committees on Animal Care (IACUC numbers I04272 and IS00000178), UK Home Office, and UMCG animal facility (DEC 6369).

Version history

  1. Received: August 23, 2016
  2. Accepted: March 18, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 20, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 21, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Foijer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,356
    views
  • 436
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Floris Foijer
  2. Lee A Albacker
  3. Bjorn Bakker
  4. Diana C Spierings
  5. Ying Yue
  6. Stephanie Z Xie
  7. Stephanie H Davis
  8. Annegret Lutum-Jehle
  9. Darin Takemoto
  10. Brian Hare
  11. Brinley Furey
  12. Roderick T Bronson
  13. Peter M Lansdorp
  14. Allan Bradley
  15. Peter K Sorger
(2017)
Deletion of the MAD2L1 spindle assembly checkpoint gene is tolerated in mouse models of acute T-cell lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma
eLife 6:e20873.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20873

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20873

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Fang Huang, Zhenwei Dai ... Yang Wang
    Research Article

    Aberrant alternative splicing is well-known to be closely associated with tumorigenesis of various cancers. However, the intricate mechanisms underlying breast cancer metastasis driven by deregulated splicing events remain largely unexplored. Here, we unveiled that RBM7 is decreased in lymph node and distant organ metastases of breast cancer as compared to primary lesions and low expression of RBM7 is correlated with the reduced disease-free survival of breast cancer patients. Breast cancer cells with RBM7 depletion exhibited an increased potential for lung metastasis compared to scramble control cells. The absence of RBM7 stimulated breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and angiogenesis. Mechanistically, RBM7 controlled the splicing switch of MFGE8, favoring the production of the predominant isoform of MFGE8, MFGE8-L. This resulted in the attenuation of STAT1 phosphorylation and alterations in cell adhesion molecules. MFGE8-L exerted an inhibitory effect on the migratory and invasive capability of breast cancer cells, while the truncated isoform MFGE8-S, which lack the second F5/8 type C domain had the opposite effect. In addition, RBM7 negatively regulates the NF-κB cascade and an NF-κB inhibitor could obstruct the increase in HUVEC tube formation caused by RBM7 silencing. Clinically, we noticed a positive correlation between RBM7 expression and MFGE8 exon7 inclusion in breast cancer tissues, providing new mechanistic insights for molecular-targeted therapy in combating breast cancer.