Phenotypic outcomes in Mouse and Human Foxc1 dependent Dandy-Walker cerebellar malformation suggest shared mechanisms

  1. Parthiv Haldipur
  2. Derek Dang
  3. Kimberly A Aldinger
  4. Olivia K Janson
  5. Fabien Guimiot
  6. Homa Adle-Biasette
  7. William B Dobyns
  8. Joseph R Siebert
  9. Rosa Russo
  10. Kathleen J Millen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Seattle Children's Research Institute, United States
  2. SCRI, United States
  3. Seattle Chidren's Research Institute, United States
  4. INSERM UMR 1141, France
  5. Seattle Children's Hospital, United States
  6. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Italy

Abstract

FOXC1 loss contributes to Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM), a common human cerebellar malformation.  Previously we found that complete Foxc1 loss leads to aberrations in proliferation, neuronal differentiation and migration in the embryonic mouse cerebellum (Haldipur et al., 2014). We now demonstrate that hypomorphic Foxc1 mutant mice have granule and Purkinje cell abnormalities causing subsequent disruptions in postnatal cerebellar foliation and lamination. Particularly striking is the presence of a partially formed posterior lobule echoing the posterior vermis DW "tail sign" observed in human imaging studies. Lineage tracing experiments in Foxc1 mutant mouse cerebella indicate aberrant migration of granule cell progenitors destined to form the posterior-most lobule causes this unique phenotype. Analyses of rare human del chr 6p25 fetal cerebella demonstrate extensive phenotypic overlap with our Foxc1 mutant mouse models, validating our DWM models and demonstrating that many key mechanisms controlling cerebellar development are likely conserved between mouse and human.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Parthiv Haldipur

    Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Derek Dang

    CIBR, SCRI, SEATTLE, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kimberly A Aldinger

    CIBR, SCRI, SEATTLE, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Olivia K Janson

    Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Chidren's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fabien Guimiot

    Hôpital Robert-Debré, INSERM UMR 1141, PARIS, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Homa Adle-Biasette

    Hôpital Robert-Debré, INSERM UMR 1141, PARIS, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. William B Dobyns

    CIBR, SCRI, SEATTLE, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joseph R Siebert

    pathology, Seattle Children's Hospital, seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rosa Russo

    University Medical College, S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kathleen J Millen

    Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    kathleen.millen@seattlechildrens.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9978-675X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01NS072441)

  • Kathleen J Millen

National Institutes of Health (R01NS080390)

  • Kathleen J Millen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Robb Krumlauf, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experimentation for this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol no 14208), of Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA..

Human subjects: All human studies were approved by Institutional Review Boards at all participating institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Version history

  1. Received: August 23, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 15, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 16, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 27, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Haldipur et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,585
    views
  • 281
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Parthiv Haldipur
  2. Derek Dang
  3. Kimberly A Aldinger
  4. Olivia K Janson
  5. Fabien Guimiot
  6. Homa Adle-Biasette
  7. William B Dobyns
  8. Joseph R Siebert
  9. Rosa Russo
  10. Kathleen J Millen
(2017)
Phenotypic outcomes in Mouse and Human Foxc1 dependent Dandy-Walker cerebellar malformation suggest shared mechanisms
eLife 6:e20898.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20898

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20898

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Arne Elofsson, Ling Han ... Luca Jovine
    Research Article

    A crucial event in sexual reproduction is when haploid sperm and egg fuse to form a new diploid organism at fertilization. In mammals, direct interaction between egg JUNO and sperm IZUMO1 mediates gamete membrane adhesion, yet their role in fusion remains enigmatic. We used AlphaFold to predict the structure of other extracellular proteins essential for fertilization to determine if they could form a complex that may mediate fusion. We first identified TMEM81, whose gene is expressed by mouse and human spermatids, as a protein having structural homologies with both IZUMO1 and another sperm molecule essential for gamete fusion, SPACA6. Using a set of proteins known to be important for fertilization and TMEM81, we then systematically searched for predicted binary interactions using an unguided approach and identified a pentameric complex involving sperm IZUMO1, SPACA6, TMEM81 and egg JUNO, CD9. This complex is structurally consistent with both the expected topology on opposing gamete membranes and the location of predicted N-glycans not modeled by AlphaFold-Multimer, suggesting that its components could organize into a synapse-like assembly at the point of fusion. Finally, the structural modeling approach described here could be more generally useful to gain insights into transient protein complexes difficult to detect experimentally.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Amandine Jarysta, Abigail LD Tadenev ... Basile Tarchini
    Research Article

    Inhibitory G alpha (GNAI or Gαi) proteins are critical for the polarized morphogenesis of sensory hair cells and for hearing. The extent and nature of their actual contributions remains unclear, however, as previous studies did not investigate all GNAI proteins and included non-physiological approaches. Pertussis toxin can downregulate functionally redundant GNAI1, GNAI2, GNAI3, and GNAO proteins, but may also induce unrelated defects. Here, we directly and systematically determine the role(s) of each individual GNAI protein in mouse auditory hair cells. GNAI2 and GNAI3 are similarly polarized at the hair cell apex with their binding partner G protein signaling modulator 2 (GPSM2), whereas GNAI1 and GNAO are not detected. In Gnai3 mutants, GNAI2 progressively fails to fully occupy the sub-cellular compartments where GNAI3 is missing. In contrast, GNAI3 can fully compensate for the loss of GNAI2 and is essential for hair bundle morphogenesis and auditory function. Simultaneous inactivation of Gnai2 and Gnai3 recapitulates for the first time two distinct types of defects only observed so far with pertussis toxin: (1) a delay or failure of the basal body to migrate off-center in prospective hair cells, and (2) a reversal in the orientation of some hair cell types. We conclude that GNAI proteins are critical for hair cells to break planar symmetry and to orient properly before GNAI2/3 regulate hair bundle morphogenesis with GPSM2.