Phenotypic outcomes in Mouse and Human Foxc1 dependent Dandy-Walker cerebellar malformation suggest shared mechanisms

  1. Parthiv Haldipur
  2. Derek Dang
  3. Kimberly A Aldinger
  4. Olivia K Janson
  5. Fabien Guimiot
  6. Homa Adle-Biasette
  7. William B Dobyns
  8. Joseph R Siebert
  9. Rosa Russo
  10. Kathleen J Millen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Seattle Children's Research Institute, United States
  2. SCRI, United States
  3. Seattle Chidren's Research Institute, United States
  4. INSERM UMR 1141, France
  5. Seattle Children's Hospital, United States
  6. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Italy

Abstract

FOXC1 loss contributes to Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM), a common human cerebellar malformation.  Previously we found that complete Foxc1 loss leads to aberrations in proliferation, neuronal differentiation and migration in the embryonic mouse cerebellum (Haldipur et al., 2014). We now demonstrate that hypomorphic Foxc1 mutant mice have granule and Purkinje cell abnormalities causing subsequent disruptions in postnatal cerebellar foliation and lamination. Particularly striking is the presence of a partially formed posterior lobule echoing the posterior vermis DW "tail sign" observed in human imaging studies. Lineage tracing experiments in Foxc1 mutant mouse cerebella indicate aberrant migration of granule cell progenitors destined to form the posterior-most lobule causes this unique phenotype. Analyses of rare human del chr 6p25 fetal cerebella demonstrate extensive phenotypic overlap with our Foxc1 mutant mouse models, validating our DWM models and demonstrating that many key mechanisms controlling cerebellar development are likely conserved between mouse and human.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Parthiv Haldipur

    Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Derek Dang

    CIBR, SCRI, SEATTLE, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kimberly A Aldinger

    CIBR, SCRI, SEATTLE, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Olivia K Janson

    Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Chidren's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fabien Guimiot

    Hôpital Robert-Debré, INSERM UMR 1141, PARIS, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Homa Adle-Biasette

    Hôpital Robert-Debré, INSERM UMR 1141, PARIS, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. William B Dobyns

    CIBR, SCRI, SEATTLE, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joseph R Siebert

    pathology, Seattle Children's Hospital, seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rosa Russo

    University Medical College, S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kathleen J Millen

    Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    kathleen.millen@seattlechildrens.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9978-675X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01NS072441)

  • Kathleen J Millen

National Institutes of Health (R01NS080390)

  • Kathleen J Millen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Robb Krumlauf, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experimentation for this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol no 14208), of Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA..

Human subjects: All human studies were approved by Institutional Review Boards at all participating institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Version history

  1. Received: August 23, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 15, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 16, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 27, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Haldipur et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,608
    views
  • 281
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Parthiv Haldipur
  2. Derek Dang
  3. Kimberly A Aldinger
  4. Olivia K Janson
  5. Fabien Guimiot
  6. Homa Adle-Biasette
  7. William B Dobyns
  8. Joseph R Siebert
  9. Rosa Russo
  10. Kathleen J Millen
(2017)
Phenotypic outcomes in Mouse and Human Foxc1 dependent Dandy-Walker cerebellar malformation suggest shared mechanisms
eLife 6:e20898.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20898

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20898

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Phuong-Khanh Nguyen, Louise Y Cheng
    Research Article Updated

    The brain is consisted of diverse neurons arising from a limited number of neural stem cells. Drosophila neural stem cells called neuroblasts (NBs) produces specific neural lineages of various lineage sizes depending on their location in the brain. In the Drosophila visual processing centre - the optic lobes (OLs), medulla NBs derived from the neuroepithelium (NE) give rise to neurons and glia cells of the medulla cortex. The timing and the mechanisms responsible for the cessation of medulla NBs are so far not known. In this study, we show that the termination of medulla NBs during early pupal development is determined by the exhaustion of the NE stem cell pool. Hence, altering NE-NB transition during larval neurogenesis disrupts the timely termination of medulla NBs. Medulla NBs terminate neurogenesis via a combination of apoptosis, terminal symmetric division via Prospero, and a switch to gliogenesis via Glial Cell Missing (Gcm); however, these processes occur independently of each other. We also show that temporal progression of the medulla NBs is mostly not required for their termination. As the Drosophila OL shares a similar mode of division with mammalian neurogenesis, understanding when and how these progenitors cease proliferation during development can have important implications for mammalian brain size determination and regulation of its overall function.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Amy R Poe, Lucy Zhu ... Matthew S Kayser
    Research Article

    Sleep and feeding patterns lack strong daily rhythms during early life. As diurnal animals mature, feeding is consolidated to the day and sleep to the night. In Drosophila, circadian sleep patterns are initiated with formation of a circuit connecting the central clock to arousal output neurons; emergence of circadian sleep also enables long-term memory (LTM). However, the cues that trigger the development of this clock-arousal circuit are unknown. Here, we identify a role for nutritional status in driving sleep-wake rhythm development in Drosophila larvae. We find that in the 2nd instar larval period (L2), sleep and feeding are spread across the day; these behaviors become organized into daily patterns by the 3rd instar larval stage (L3). Forcing mature (L3) animals to adopt immature (L2) feeding strategies disrupts sleep-wake rhythms and the ability to exhibit LTM. In addition, the development of the clock (DN1a)-arousal (Dh44) circuit itself is influenced by the larval nutritional environment. Finally, we demonstrate that larval arousal Dh44 neurons act through glucose metabolic genes to drive onset of daily sleep-wake rhythms. Together, our data suggest that changes to energetic demands in developing organisms trigger the formation of sleep-circadian circuits and behaviors.