Abstract

Membrane proteins frequently assemble into higher order homo- or hetero-oligomers within their natural lipid environment. This complex formation can modulate their folding, activity as well as substrate selectivity. Non-disruptive methods avoiding critical steps such as membrane disintegration, transfer into artificial environments or chemical modifications are therefore essential to analyze molecular mechanisms of native membrane protein assemblies. The combination of cell-free synthetic biology, nanodisc-technology and non-covalent mass spectrometry provides excellent synergies for the analysis of membrane protein oligomerization within defined membranes. We exemplify our strategy by oligomeric state characterization of various membrane proteins including ion channels, transporters and membrane integrated enzymes assembling up to hexameric complexes. We further indicate a lipid dependent dimer formation of MraY translocase correlating with the enzymatic activity. The detergent free synthesis of membrane protein/nanodisc samples and the analysis by LILBID mass spectrometry provides a versatile platform for the analysis of membrane proteins in a native environment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Erik Henrich

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Oliver Peetz

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Christopher Hein

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Aisha Laguerre

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Beate Hoffmann

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jan Hoffmann

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Volker Dötsch

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    Volker Dötsch, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5720-212X
  8. Frank Bernhard

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Nina Morgner

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    morgner@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1872-490X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 807)

  • Erik Henrich
  • Oliver Peetz
  • Christopher Hein

European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (Instruct)

  • Frank Bernhard

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DO545/11)

  • Aisha Laguerre

National Institutes of Health (U54GM087519)

  • Beate Hoffmann

Max Planck Research School for Structure and Function of Biological Membranes

  • Beate Hoffmann

Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt

  • Volker Dötsch
  • Nina Morgner

European Research Council (European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ ERC Grant agreement n{degree sign} 337)

  • Nina Morgner

P4EU

  • Frank Bernhard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Olga Boudker, Weill Cornell Medical College, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 25, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 4, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 9, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 26, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Henrich et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,145
    views
  • 1,072
    downloads
  • 72
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Erik Henrich
  2. Oliver Peetz
  3. Christopher Hein
  4. Aisha Laguerre
  5. Beate Hoffmann
  6. Jan Hoffmann
  7. Volker Dötsch
  8. Frank Bernhard
  9. Nina Morgner
(2017)
Analyzing native membrane protein assembly in nanodiscs by combined non-covalent mass spectrometry and synthetic biology
eLife 6:e20954.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20954

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20954

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.