Abstract

Membrane proteins frequently assemble into higher order homo- or hetero-oligomers within their natural lipid environment. This complex formation can modulate their folding, activity as well as substrate selectivity. Non-disruptive methods avoiding critical steps such as membrane disintegration, transfer into artificial environments or chemical modifications are therefore essential to analyze molecular mechanisms of native membrane protein assemblies. The combination of cell-free synthetic biology, nanodisc-technology and non-covalent mass spectrometry provides excellent synergies for the analysis of membrane protein oligomerization within defined membranes. We exemplify our strategy by oligomeric state characterization of various membrane proteins including ion channels, transporters and membrane integrated enzymes assembling up to hexameric complexes. We further indicate a lipid dependent dimer formation of MraY translocase correlating with the enzymatic activity. The detergent free synthesis of membrane protein/nanodisc samples and the analysis by LILBID mass spectrometry provides a versatile platform for the analysis of membrane proteins in a native environment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Erik Henrich

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Oliver Peetz

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Christopher Hein

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Aisha Laguerre

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Beate Hoffmann

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jan Hoffmann

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Volker Dötsch

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    Volker Dötsch, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5720-212X
  8. Frank Bernhard

    Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Nina Morgner

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    morgner@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1872-490X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 807)

  • Erik Henrich
  • Oliver Peetz
  • Christopher Hein

European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (Instruct)

  • Frank Bernhard

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DO545/11)

  • Aisha Laguerre

National Institutes of Health (U54GM087519)

  • Beate Hoffmann

Max Planck Research School for Structure and Function of Biological Membranes

  • Beate Hoffmann

Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt

  • Volker Dötsch
  • Nina Morgner

European Research Council (European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ ERC Grant agreement n{degree sign} 337)

  • Nina Morgner

P4EU

  • Frank Bernhard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Olga Boudker, Weill Cornell Medical College, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 25, 2016
  2. Accepted: January 4, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 9, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 26, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Henrich et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,099
    views
  • 1,071
    downloads
  • 72
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Erik Henrich
  2. Oliver Peetz
  3. Christopher Hein
  4. Aisha Laguerre
  5. Beate Hoffmann
  6. Jan Hoffmann
  7. Volker Dötsch
  8. Frank Bernhard
  9. Nina Morgner
(2017)
Analyzing native membrane protein assembly in nanodiscs by combined non-covalent mass spectrometry and synthetic biology
eLife 6:e20954.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20954

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20954

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.