1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Spinal microcircuits comprising dI3 interneurons are necessary for motor functional recovery following spinal cord transection

  1. Tuan V Bui
  2. Nicolas Stifani
  3. Turgay Akay
  4. Robert M Brownstone  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Ottawa, Canada
  2. Dalhousie University, Canada
  3. University College London, Canada
Research Article
  • Cited 25
  • Views 2,442
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e21715 doi: 10.7554/eLife.21715

Abstract

The spinal cord has the capacity to coordinate motor activities such as locomotion. Following spinal transection, functional activity can be regained, to a degree, following motor training. To identify microcircuits involved in this recovery, we studied a population of mouse spinal interneurons known to receive direct afferent inputs and project to intermediate and ventral regions of the spinal cord. We demonstrate that while dI3 interneurons are not necessary for normal locomotor activity, locomotor circuits rhythmically inhibit them and dI3 interneurons can activate these circuits. Removing dI3 interneurons from spinal microcircuits by eliminating their synaptic transmission left locomotion more or less unchanged, but abolished functional recovery, indicating that dI3 interneurons are a necessary cellular substrate for motor system plasticity following transection. We suggest that dI3 interneurons compare inputs from locomotor circuits with sensory afferent inputs to compute sensory prediction errors that then modify locomotor circuits to effect motor recovery.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tuan V Bui

    Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nicolas Stifani

    Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8584-9561
  3. Turgay Akay

    Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Robert M Brownstone

    Dalhousie University, University College London, Halifax, Canada
    For correspondence
    R.Brownstone@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5135-2725

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Operating grant, FRN 79413)

  • Robert M Brownstone

Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (Post-doctoral fellowship)

  • Tuan V Bui

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery grant, RGPIN-2015-06403)

  • Tuan V Bui

Canada Research Chairs (Research Chair)

  • Robert M Brownstone

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Fellowship)

  • Tuan V Bui

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the University Committee on Laboratory Animals of Dalhousie University (protocol 13-143) and conform to the guidelines put forth by the Canadian Council for Animal Care.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ole Kiehn, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden

Publication history

  1. Received: September 21, 2016
  2. Accepted: December 12, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 15, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: December 22, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: January 6, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Bui et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,442
    Page views
  • 474
    Downloads
  • 25
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhengchao Xu et al.
    Tools and Resources Updated

    The dorsal raphe nucleus (DR) and median raphe nucleus (MR) contain populations of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons that regulate diverse behavioral functions. However, their whole-brain input-output circuits remain incompletely elucidated. We used viral tracing combined with fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography to generate a comprehensive whole-brain atlas of inputs and outputs of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the DR and MR. We found that these neurons received inputs from similar upstream brain regions. The glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the same raphe nucleus had divergent projection patterns with differences in critical brain regions. Specifically, MR glutamatergic neurons projected to the lateral habenula through multiple pathways. Correlation and cluster analysis revealed that glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the same raphe nucleus received heterogeneous inputs and sent different collateral projections. This connectivity atlas further elucidates the anatomical architecture of the raphe nuclei, which could facilitate better understanding of their behavioral functions.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shankar Ramachandran et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Neuromodulators promote adaptive behaviors that are often complex and involve concerted activity changes across circuits that are often not physically connected. It is not well understood how neuromodulatory systems accomplish these tasks. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans NLP-12 neuropeptide system shapes responses to food availability by modulating the activity of head and body wall motor neurons through alternate G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, CKR-1 and CKR-2. We show ckr-2 deletion reduces body bend depth during movement under basal conditions. We demonstrate CKR-1 is a functional NLP-12 receptor and define its expression in the nervous system. In contrast to basal locomotion, biased CKR-1 GPCR stimulation of head motor neurons promotes turning during local searching. Deletion of ckr-1 reduces head neuron activity and diminishes turning while specific ckr-1 overexpression or head neuron activation promote turning. Thus, our studies suggest locomotor responses to changing food availability are regulated through conditional NLP-12 stimulation of head or body wall motor circuits.