Frequent exchange of the DNA polymerase during bacterial chromosome replication

  1. Thomas R Beattie
  2. Nitin Kapadia
  3. Emilien Nicolas
  4. Stephan Uphoff
  5. Adam JM Wollman
  6. Mark C Leake
  7. Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada
  2. Fast Track Diagnostics Luxembourg S.à.r.l, Luxembourg
  3. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  4. University of York, United Kingdom

Abstract

The replisome is a multiprotein machine that carries out DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, a single pair of replisomes is responsible for duplicating the entire 4.6 Mbp circular chromosome (Beattie and Reyes-Lamothe, 2015). In vitro studies of reconstituted E. coli replisomes have attributed this remarkable processivity to the high stability of the replisome once assembled on DNA (Tanner et al., 2011, Yao et al., 2009, Kim et al., 1996b). By examining replisomes in live E. coli with fluorescence microscopy, we found that the Pol III* subassembly frequently disengages from the replisome during DNA synthesis and exchanges with free copies from solution. In contrast, the DnaB helicase associates stably with the replication fork, providing the molecular basis for how the E. coli replisome can maintain high processivity and yet possess the flexibility to bypass obstructions in template DNA. Our data challenges the widely-accepted semi-discontinuous model of chromosomal replication, instead supporting a fully discontinuous mechanism in which synthesis of both leading and lagging strands is frequently interrupted.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thomas R Beattie

    Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nitin Kapadia

    Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Emilien Nicolas

    Fast Track Diagnostics Luxembourg S.à.r.l, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephan Uphoff

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adam JM Wollman

    Biological Physical Sciences Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mark C Leake

    Biological Physical Sciences Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

    Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    rodrigo.reyes@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5330-3481

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant,435521-2013)

  • Thomas R Beattie
  • Nitin Kapadia
  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Canada Research Chairs (Tier II,950-228994)

  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Operating Grant,142473)

  • Thomas R Beattie
  • Nitin Kapadia
  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Canada Foundation for Innovation (Leaders Oportunity Fund,228994)

  • Thomas R Beattie
  • Nitin Kapadia
  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Wellcome (Junior Research Fellowship)

  • Stephan Uphoff

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC# BB/N006453/1)

  • Adam JM Wollman
  • Mark C Leake

Medical Research Council (MRC# MR/K01580X/1)

  • Adam JM Wollman
  • Mark C Leake

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Beattie et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,424
    views
  • 849
    downloads
  • 111
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thomas R Beattie
  2. Nitin Kapadia
  3. Emilien Nicolas
  4. Stephan Uphoff
  5. Adam JM Wollman
  6. Mark C Leake
  7. Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe
(2017)
Frequent exchange of the DNA polymerase during bacterial chromosome replication
eLife 6:e21763.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21763

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21763

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Qian Wang, Jinxin Liu ... Qian Liu
    Research Article

    Paramyxovirus membrane fusion requires an attachment protein for receptor binding and a fusion protein for membrane fusion triggering. Nipah virus (NiV) attachment protein (G) binds to ephrinB2 or -B3 receptors, and fusion protein (F) mediates membrane fusion. NiV-F is a class I fusion protein and is activated by endosomal cleavage. The crystal structure of a soluble GCN4-decorated NiV-F shows a hexamer-of-trimer assembly. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy to quantify the NiV-F distribution and organization on cell and virus-like particle membranes at a nanometer precision. We found that NiV-F on biological membranes forms distinctive clusters that are independent of endosomal cleavage or expression levels. The sequestration of NiV-F into dense clusters favors membrane fusion triggering. The nano-distribution and organization of NiV-F are susceptible to mutations at the hexamer-of-trimer interface, and the putative oligomerization motif on the transmembrane domain. We also show that NiV-F nanoclusters are maintained by NiV-F–AP-2 interactions and the clathrin coat assembly. We propose that the organization of NiV-F into nanoclusters facilitates membrane fusion triggering by a mixed population of NiV-F molecules with varied degrees of cleavage and opportunities for interacting with the NiV-G/receptor complex. These observations provide insights into the in situ organization and activation mechanisms of the NiV fusion machinery.