Frequent exchange of the DNA polymerase during bacterial chromosome replication

  1. Thomas R Beattie
  2. Nitin Kapadia
  3. Emilien Nicolas
  4. Stephan Uphoff
  5. Adam JM Wollman
  6. Mark C Leake
  7. Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada
  2. Fast Track Diagnostics Luxembourg S.à.r.l, Luxembourg
  3. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  4. University of York, United Kingdom

Abstract

The replisome is a multiprotein machine that carries out DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, a single pair of replisomes is responsible for duplicating the entire 4.6 Mbp circular chromosome (Beattie and Reyes-Lamothe, 2015). In vitro studies of reconstituted E. coli replisomes have attributed this remarkable processivity to the high stability of the replisome once assembled on DNA (Tanner et al., 2011, Yao et al., 2009, Kim et al., 1996b). By examining replisomes in live E. coli with fluorescence microscopy, we found that the Pol III* subassembly frequently disengages from the replisome during DNA synthesis and exchanges with free copies from solution. In contrast, the DnaB helicase associates stably with the replication fork, providing the molecular basis for how the E. coli replisome can maintain high processivity and yet possess the flexibility to bypass obstructions in template DNA. Our data challenges the widely-accepted semi-discontinuous model of chromosomal replication, instead supporting a fully discontinuous mechanism in which synthesis of both leading and lagging strands is frequently interrupted.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thomas R Beattie

    Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nitin Kapadia

    Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Emilien Nicolas

    Fast Track Diagnostics Luxembourg S.à.r.l, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephan Uphoff

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adam JM Wollman

    Biological Physical Sciences Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mark C Leake

    Biological Physical Sciences Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

    Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    rodrigo.reyes@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5330-3481

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant,435521-2013)

  • Thomas R Beattie
  • Nitin Kapadia
  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Canada Research Chairs (Tier II,950-228994)

  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Operating Grant,142473)

  • Thomas R Beattie
  • Nitin Kapadia
  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Canada Foundation for Innovation (Leaders Oportunity Fund,228994)

  • Thomas R Beattie
  • Nitin Kapadia
  • Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe

Wellcome (Junior Research Fellowship)

  • Stephan Uphoff

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC# BB/N006453/1)

  • Adam JM Wollman
  • Mark C Leake

Medical Research Council (MRC# MR/K01580X/1)

  • Adam JM Wollman
  • Mark C Leake

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Beattie et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,465
    views
  • 855
    downloads
  • 113
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thomas R Beattie
  2. Nitin Kapadia
  3. Emilien Nicolas
  4. Stephan Uphoff
  5. Adam JM Wollman
  6. Mark C Leake
  7. Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe
(2017)
Frequent exchange of the DNA polymerase during bacterial chromosome replication
eLife 6:e21763.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21763

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21763

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.