Distinct memory engrams in the infralimbic cortex of rats control opposing environmental actions on a learned behavior

  1. Nobuyoshi Suto  Is a corresponding author
  2. Amanda Laque
  3. Genna L De Ness
  4. Grant E Wagner
  5. Debbie Watry
  6. Tony Kerr
  7. Eisuke Koya
  8. Mark R Mayford
  9. Bruce T Hope  Is a corresponding author
  10. Friedbert Weiss  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
  2. University of Sussex, United Kingdom
  3. University of California San Diego, United States
  4. National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States

Abstract

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the role of infralimbic cortex (IL) in the environmental control of appetitive behavior. Inhibition of IL, irrespective of its intrinsic neural activity, attenuates not only the ability of environmental cues predictive of reward availability to promote reward seeking, but also the ability of environmental cues predictive of reward omission to suppress this behavior. Here we report that such bidirectional behavioral modulation in rats is mediated by functionally distinct units of neurons (neural ensembles) that are concurrently localized within the same IL brain area but selectively reactive to different environmental cues. Ensemble-specific neural activity is thought to function as a memory engram representing a learned association between environment and behavior. Our findings establish the causal evidence for the concurrent existence of two distinct engrams within a single brain site, each mediating opposing environmental actions on a learned behavior.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nobuyoshi Suto

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    nsuto@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8994-2592
  2. Amanda Laque

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Genna L De Ness

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Grant E Wagner

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Debbie Watry

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tony Kerr

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Eisuke Koya

    Sussex School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mark R Mayford

    Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bruce T Hope

    Behavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    bhope@intra.nida.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Friedbert Weiss

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    bweiss@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA033533)

  • Nobuyoshi Suto

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA023183)

  • Nobuyoshi Suto

National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA037294)

  • Nobuyoshi Suto

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA021549)

  • Friedbert Weiss

National Institute on Drug Abuse (ZIADA000467)

  • Bruce T Hope

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were conducted in adherence to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The Scripps Research Institute. (animal protocol #12-0032).

Copyright

© 2016, Suto et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,932
    views
  • 746
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nobuyoshi Suto
  2. Amanda Laque
  3. Genna L De Ness
  4. Grant E Wagner
  5. Debbie Watry
  6. Tony Kerr
  7. Eisuke Koya
  8. Mark R Mayford
  9. Bruce T Hope
  10. Friedbert Weiss
(2016)
Distinct memory engrams in the infralimbic cortex of rats control opposing environmental actions on a learned behavior
eLife 5:e21920.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21920

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21920

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lauren J Kreeger, Suraj Honnuraiah ... Lisa Goodrich
    Research Article

    Animals navigate the auditory world by recognizing complex sounds, from the rustle of a predator to the call of a potential mate. This ability depends in part on the octopus cells of the auditory brainstem, which respond to multiple frequencies that change over time, as occurs in natural stimuli. Unlike the average neuron, which integrates inputs over time on the order of tens of milliseconds, octopus cells must detect momentary coincidence of excitatory inputs from the cochlea during an ongoing sound on both the millisecond and submillisecond time scale. Here, we show that octopus cells receive inhibitory inputs on their dendrites that enhance opportunities for coincidence detection in the cell body, thereby allowing for responses both to rapid onsets at the beginning of a sound and to frequency modulations during the sound. This mechanism is crucial for the fundamental process of integrating the synchronized frequencies of natural auditory signals over time.

    1. Neuroscience
    Phillip P Witkowski, Lindsay JH Rondot ... Erie Boorman
    Research Article

    Adaptive behavior in complex environments critically relies on the ability to appropriately link specific choices or actions to their outcomes. However, the neural mechanisms that support the ability to credit only those past choices believed to have caused the observed outcomes remain unclear. Here, we leverage multivariate pattern analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and an adaptive learning task to shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of such specific credit assignment. We find that the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and hippocampus (HC) code for the causal choice identity when credit needs to be assigned for choices that are separated from outcomes by a long delay, even when this delayed transition is punctuated by interim decisions. Further, we show when interim decisions must be made, learning is additionally supported by lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC). Our results indicate that lFPC holds previous causal choices in a ‘pending’ state until a relevant outcome is observed, and the fidelity of these representations predicts the fidelity of subsequent causal choice representations in lOFC and HC during credit assignment. Together, these results highlight the importance of the timely reinstatement of specific causes in lOFC and HC in learning choice-outcome relationships when delays and choices intervene, a critical component of real-world learning and decision making.