Length-dependent flagellar growth of Vibrio alginolyticus revealed by real time fluorescent imaging

  1. Meiting Chen
  2. Ziyi Zhao
  3. Jin Yang
  4. Kai Peng
  5. Matthew A.B. Baker
  6. Fan Bai  Is a corresponding author
  7. Chien-Jung Lo  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Central University, Taiwan, Republic of China
  2. Peking University, China
  3. University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Bacterial flagella are extracellular filaments that drive swimming in bacteria. During its assembly, flagellins are transported unfolded through the central channel in the flagellum to the growing tip. Here we applied in vivo fluorescent imaging to monitor in real time the Vibrio alginolyticus polar flagella growth. The flagellar growth rate is found to be highly length-dependent. Initially, the flagellum grows at a constant rate (50nm/min) when shorter than 1500nm. The growth rate decays sharply when the flagellum grows longer. We modeled flagellin transport inside the channel as a one-dimensional diffusive process with an injection force at its base. When the flagellum is short, its growth rate is determined by the loading speed at the base. Only when the flagellum grows longer does diffusion of flagellin become the rate-limiting step, dramatically reducing the growth rate. Our results shed new light on the dynamic building process of this complex extracellular structure.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Meiting Chen

    Physics, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ziyi Zhao

    Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jin Yang

    Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kai Peng

    Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthew A.B. Baker

    EMBL Australia Node for Single Molecule Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fan Bai

    Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    fbai@pku.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chien-Jung Lo

    Phyiscs, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, Republic of China
    For correspondence
    cjlo@phy.ncu.edu.tw
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8078-4970

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-103-2112-M-008-010-MY3)

  • Chien-Jung Lo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31370847,No.31327901)

  • Fan Bai

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0041/2015)

  • Fan Bai
  • Chien-Jung Lo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,634
    views
  • 510
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Meiting Chen
  2. Ziyi Zhao
  3. Jin Yang
  4. Kai Peng
  5. Matthew A.B. Baker
  6. Fan Bai
  7. Chien-Jung Lo
(2017)
Length-dependent flagellar growth of Vibrio alginolyticus revealed by real time fluorescent imaging
eLife 6:e22140.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22140

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22140

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.