FlpStop, a tool for conditional gene control in Drosophila

  1. Yvette Erica Fisher
  2. Helen H Yang
  3. Jesse Isaacman-Beck
  4. Marjorie Xie
  5. Daryl M Gohl
  6. Thomas R Clandinin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. University of Minnesota Genomics Center, United States

Abstract

Manipulating gene function cell type-specifically is a common experimental goal in Drosophila research and has been central to studies of neural development, circuit computation, and behavior. However, current cell type-specific gene disruption techniques in flies often reduce gene activity incompletely or rely on cell division. Here we describe FlpStop, a generalizable tool for conditional gene disruption and rescue in post-mitotic cells. In proof-of-principle experiments, we manipulated apterous, a regulator of wing development. Next, we produced conditional null alleles of Glutamic acid decarboxylase 1(Gad1) and Resistant to dieldrin (Rdl), genes vital for GABAergic neurotransmission, as well as cacophony (cac) and paralytic (para), voltage-gated ion channels central to neuronal excitability. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we manipulated cac in a specific visual interneuron type and discovered differential regulation of calcium signals across subcellular compartments. Thus, FlpStop will facilitate investigations into the interactions between genes, circuits, and computation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yvette Erica Fisher

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Helen H Yang

    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5140-9664
  3. Jesse Isaacman-Beck

    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marjorie Xie

    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Daryl M Gohl

    University of Minnesota Genomics Center, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas R Clandinin

    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    trc@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6277-6849

Funding

National Eye Institute (R01 EY022638)

  • Thomas R Clandinin

National Institute of Mental Health (U01 MH109119)

  • Thomas R Clandinin

National Science Foundation

  • Yvette Erica Fisher

Stanford University School of Medicine

  • Helen H Yang

National Eye Institute (F32EY020040)

  • Daryl M Gohl

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Kristin Scott, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 11, 2016
  2. Accepted: February 13, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 17, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 8, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Fisher et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,688
    Page views
  • 2,099
    Downloads
  • 35
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yvette Erica Fisher
  2. Helen H Yang
  3. Jesse Isaacman-Beck
  4. Marjorie Xie
  5. Daryl M Gohl
  6. Thomas R Clandinin
(2017)
FlpStop, a tool for conditional gene control in Drosophila
eLife 6:e22279.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22279

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22279

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.