27 T ultra-high static magnetic field changes orientation and morphology of mitotic spindles in human cells

  1. Lei Zhang
  2. Yubin Hou
  3. Zhiyuan Li
  4. Xinmiao Ji
  5. Ze Wang
  6. Huizhen Wang
  7. Xiaofei Tian
  8. Fazhi Yu
  9. Zhenye Yang
  10. Li Pi
  11. Timothy J Mitchison
  12. Qingyou Lu  Is a corresponding author
  13. Xin Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. University of Science and Technology of China, China
  3. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Purified microtubules have been shown to align along the static magnetic field (SMF) in vitro because of their diamagnetic anisotropy. However, whether mitotic spindle in cells can be aligned by magnetic field has not been experimentally proved. In particular, the biological effects of SMF of above 20 T (Tesla) have never been reported. Here we found that in both CNE-2Z and RPE1 human cells spindle orients in 27 T SMF. The direction of spindle alignment depended on the extent to which chromosomes were aligned to form a planar metaphase plate. Our results show that the magnetic torque acts on both microtubules and chromosomes, and the preferred direction of spindle alignment relative to the field depends more on chromosome alignment than microtubules. In addition, spindle morphology was also perturbed by 27 T SMF. This is the first reported study that investigated the cellular responses to ultra-high magnetic field of above 20 T. Our study not only found that ultra-high magnetic field can change the orientation and morphology of mitotic spindles, but also provided a tool to probe the role of spindle orientation and perturbation in developmental and cancer biology.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lei Zhang

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yubin Hou

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zhiyuan Li

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Xinmiao Ji

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ze Wang

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Huizhen Wang

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xiaofei Tian

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fazhi Yu

    University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zhenye Yang

    University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Li Pi

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Timothy J Mitchison

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Qingyou Lu

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    For correspondence
    qxl@ustc.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xin Zhang

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    For correspondence
    xinzhang@hmfl.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3499-2189

Funding

national key research and development program of china (#2016YFA0400900)

  • Xin Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1532151)

  • Xin Zhang

Hefei Science Center (2016HSC-IU007)

  • Xin Zhang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anthony A Hyman, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: November 2, 2016
  2. Accepted: February 26, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 28, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 28, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: May 4, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,347
    Page views
  • 596
    Downloads
  • 57
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lei Zhang
  2. Yubin Hou
  3. Zhiyuan Li
  4. Xinmiao Ji
  5. Ze Wang
  6. Huizhen Wang
  7. Xiaofei Tian
  8. Fazhi Yu
  9. Zhenye Yang
  10. Li Pi
  11. Timothy J Mitchison
  12. Qingyou Lu
  13. Xin Zhang
(2017)
27 T ultra-high static magnetic field changes orientation and morphology of mitotic spindles in human cells
eLife 6:e22911.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22911

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22911

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Fabien Duveau, Céline Cordier ... Pascal Hersen
    Research Article

    Natural environments of living organisms are often dynamic and multifactorial, with multiple parameters fluctuating over time. To better understand how cells respond to dynamically interacting factors, we quantified the effects of dual fluctuations of osmotic stress and glucose deprivation on yeast cells using microfluidics and time-lapse microscopy. Strikingly, we observed that cell proliferation, survival, and signaling depend on the phasing of the two periodic stresses. Cells divided faster, survived longer, and showed decreased transcriptional response when fluctuations of hyperosmotic stress and glucose deprivation occurred in phase than when the two stresses occurred alternatively. Therefore, glucose availability regulates yeast responses to dynamic osmotic stress, showcasing the key role of metabolic fluctuations in cellular responses to dynamic stress. We also found that mutants with impaired osmotic stress response were better adapted to alternating stresses than wild-type cells, showing that genetic mechanisms of adaptation to a persistent stress factor can be detrimental under dynamically interacting conditions.