Multiplex image-based autophagy RNAi screening identifies SMCR8 as ULK1 kinase activity and gene expression regulator

  1. Jennifer Jung
  2. Arnab Nayak
  3. Véronique Schaeffer
  4. Tatjana Starzetz
  5. Achim Klaus Kirsch
  6. Stefan Müller
  7. Ivan Dikic
  8. Michel Mittelbronn
  9. Christian Behrends  Is a corresponding author
  1. Goethe University School of Medicine, Germany
  2. Goethe University, Germany
  3. PerkinElmer, Inc., Germany

Abstract

Autophagy is an intracellular recycling and degradation pathway that depends on membrane trafficking. Rab GTPases are central for autophagy but their regulation especially through the activity of Rab GEFs remains largely elusive. We employed a RNAi screen simultaneously monitoring different populations of autophagosomes and identified 34 out of 186 Rab GTPase, GAP and GEF family members as potential autophagy regulators, amongst them SMCR8. SMCR8 uses overlapping binding regions to associate with C9ORF72 or with a C9ORF72-ULK1 kinase complex holo-assembly, which function in maturation and formation of autophagosomes, respectively. While focusing on the role of SMCR8 during autophagy initiation, we found that kinase activity and gene expression of ULK1 are increased upon SMCR8 depletion. The latter phenotype involved association of SMCR8 with the ULK1 gene locus. Global mRNA expression analysis revealed that SMCR8 regulates transcription of several other autophagy genes including WIPI2. Collectively, we established SMCR8 as multifaceted negative autophagy regulator.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jennifer Jung

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9436-4021
  2. Arnab Nayak

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Véronique Schaeffer

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Tatjana Starzetz

    Neurological Institute, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Achim Klaus Kirsch

    PerkinElmer, Inc., Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Stefan Müller

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ivan Dikic

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Ivan Dikic, Senior Editor eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8156-9511
  8. Michel Mittelbronn

    Neurological Institute, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Christian Behrends

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    behrends@em.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9184-7607

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1177)

  • Stefan Müller
  • Ivan Dikic
  • Christian Behrends

Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (EXC 1010 SyNergy)

  • Christian Behrends

Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (EXC115)

  • Ivan Dikic

LOEWE Zentrum (Ub-net)

  • Stefan Müller
  • Ivan Dikic
  • Christian Behrends

European Research Council (ERC,282333-XABA)

  • Christian Behrends

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DI 931/3-1)

  • Ivan Dikic

LOEWE Zentrum (Gene and Cell Therapy Frankfurt)

  • Christian Behrends

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Jung et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,813
    views
  • 910
    downloads
  • 71
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jennifer Jung
  2. Arnab Nayak
  3. Véronique Schaeffer
  4. Tatjana Starzetz
  5. Achim Klaus Kirsch
  6. Stefan Müller
  7. Ivan Dikic
  8. Michel Mittelbronn
  9. Christian Behrends
(2017)
Multiplex image-based autophagy RNAi screening identifies SMCR8 as ULK1 kinase activity and gene expression regulator
eLife 6:e23063.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23063

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23063

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Yingjie Sun, Changheng Li ... Youngnam N Jin
    Research Article

    Identifying target proteins for bioactive molecules is essential for understanding their mechanisms, developing improved derivatives, and minimizing off-target effects. Despite advances in target identification (target-ID) technologies, significant challenges remain, impeding drug development. Most target-ID methods use cell lysates, but maintaining an intact cellular context is vital for capturing specific drug–protein interactions, such as those with transient protein complexes and membrane-associated proteins. To address these limitations, we developed POST-IT (Pup-On-target for Small molecule Target Identification Technology), a non-diffusive proximity tagging system for live cells, orthogonal to the eukaryotic system. POST-IT utilizes an engineered fusion of proteasomal accessory factor A and HaloTag to transfer Pup to proximal proteins upon directly binding to the small molecule. After significant optimization to eliminate self-pupylation and polypupylation, minimize depupylation, and optimize chemical linkers, POST-IT successfully identified known targets and discovered a new binder, SEPHS2, for dasatinib, and VPS37C as a new target for hydroxychloroquine, enhancing our understanding these drugs’ mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we demonstrated the application of POST-IT in live zebrafish embryos, highlighting its potential for broad biological research and drug development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Bernd K Gilsbach, Franz Y Ho ... Christian Johannes Gloeckner
    Research Article

    The Parkinson’s disease (PD)-linked protein Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) consists of seven domains, including a kinase and a Roc G domain. Despite the availability of several high-resolution structures, the dynamic regulation of its unique intramolecular domain stack is nevertheless still not well understood. By in-depth biochemical analysis, assessing the Michaelis–Menten kinetics of the Roc G domain, we have confirmed that LRRK2 has, similar to other Roco protein family members, a KM value of LRRK2 that lies within the range of the physiological GTP concentrations within the cell. Furthermore, the R1441G PD variant located within a mutational hotspot in the Roc domain showed an increased catalytic efficiency. In contrast, the most common PD variant G2019S, located in the kinase domain, showed an increased KM and reduced catalytic efficiency, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism from the kinase domain to the G domain. Autophosphorylation of the G1+2 residue (T1343) in the Roc P-loop motif is critical for this phosphoregulation of both the KM and the kcat values of the Roc-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, most likely by changing the monomer–dimer equilibrium. The LRRK2 T1343A variant has a similar increased kinase activity in cells compared to G2019S and the double mutant T1343A/G2019S has no further increased activity, suggesting that T1343 is crucial for the negative feedback in the LRRK2 signaling cascade. Together, our data reveal a novel intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, PD mutants differently change the kinetics of the GTPase cycle, which might in part explain the difference in penetrance of these mutations in PD patients.