Copy-number and gene dependency analysis reveals partial copy loss of wild-type SF3B1 as a novel cancer vulnerability

  1. Brenton R Paolella  Is a corresponding author
  2. William J Gibson
  3. Laura M Urbanski
  4. John A Alberta
  5. Travis I Zack
  6. Pratiti Bandopadhayay
  7. Caitlin A Nichols
  8. Pankaj K Agarwalla
  9. Meredith S Brown
  10. Rebecca Lamothe
  11. Yong Yu
  12. Peter S Choi
  13. Esther A Obeng
  14. Dirk Heckl
  15. Guo Wei
  16. Belinda Wang
  17. Aviad Tsherniak
  18. Francisca Vazquez
  19. Barbara A Weir
  20. David E Root
  21. Glenn S Cowley
  22. Sara J Buhrlage
  23. Charles D Stiles
  24. Benjamin L Ebert
  25. William C Hahn
  26. Robin Reed  Is a corresponding author
  27. Rameen Beroukhim  Is a corresponding author
  1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States
  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, United States

Abstract

Genomic instability is a hallmark of human cancer, and results in widespread somatic copy number alterations. We used a genome-scale shRNA viability screen in human cancer cell lines to systematically identify genes that are essential in the context of particular copy-number alterations (copy-number associated gene dependencies). The most enriched class of copy-number associated gene dependencies was CYCLOPS (Copy-number alterations Yielding Cancer Liabilities Owing to Partial losS) genes, and spliceosome components were the most prevalent. One of these, the pre-mRNA splicing factor SF3B1, is also frequently mutated in cancer. We validated SF3B1 as a CYCLOPS gene and found that human cancer cells harboring partial SF3B1 copy-loss lack a reservoir of SF3b complex that protects cells with normal SF3B1 copy number from cell death upon partial SF3B1 suppression. These data provide a catalog of copy-number associated gene dependencies and identify partial copy-loss of wild-type SF3B1 as a novel, non-driver cancer gene dependency.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Brenton R Paolella

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    brenton_paolella@dfci.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3394-828X
  2. William J Gibson

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Laura M Urbanski

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. John A Alberta

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Travis I Zack

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pratiti Bandopadhayay

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Caitlin A Nichols

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pankaj K Agarwalla

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Meredith S Brown

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Rebecca Lamothe

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yong Yu

    Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Peter S Choi

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Esther A Obeng

    Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Dirk Heckl

    Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Guo Wei

    Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Belinda Wang

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Aviad Tsherniak

    Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3797-1877
  18. Francisca Vazquez

    Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Barbara A Weir

    Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. David E Root

    Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Glenn S Cowley

    Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Sara J Buhrlage

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Charles D Stiles

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Benjamin L Ebert

    Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. William C Hahn

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2840-9791
  26. Robin Reed

    Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    robin_reed@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Rameen Beroukhim

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    Rameen_Beroukhim@dfci.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Cancer Institute (F32 CA180653)

  • Brenton R Paolella

National Cancer Institute (P50 CA165962)

  • Charles D Stiles

The Sontag Foundation

  • Rameen Beroukhim

The Grey Matters Foundation

  • Rameen Beroukhim

The Pediatric Low Grade Astrocytoma Foundation

  • Pratiti Bandopadhayay
  • Charles D Stiles
  • Rameen Beroukhim

Friends for Life Fellowship

  • Brenton R Paolella

National Cancer Institute (R01 CA188228)

  • Rameen Beroukhim

National Cancer Institute (U01 CA176058)

  • William C Hahn

National Cancer Institute (F30 CA192725)

  • William J Gibson

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM043375)

  • Robin Reed

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This work was conducted in accordance with and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#15-014) of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Copyright

© 2017, Paolella et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,516
    views
  • 1,045
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brenton R Paolella
  2. William J Gibson
  3. Laura M Urbanski
  4. John A Alberta
  5. Travis I Zack
  6. Pratiti Bandopadhayay
  7. Caitlin A Nichols
  8. Pankaj K Agarwalla
  9. Meredith S Brown
  10. Rebecca Lamothe
  11. Yong Yu
  12. Peter S Choi
  13. Esther A Obeng
  14. Dirk Heckl
  15. Guo Wei
  16. Belinda Wang
  17. Aviad Tsherniak
  18. Francisca Vazquez
  19. Barbara A Weir
  20. David E Root
  21. Glenn S Cowley
  22. Sara J Buhrlage
  23. Charles D Stiles
  24. Benjamin L Ebert
  25. William C Hahn
  26. Robin Reed
  27. Rameen Beroukhim
(2017)
Copy-number and gene dependency analysis reveals partial copy loss of wild-type SF3B1 as a novel cancer vulnerability
eLife 6:e23268.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23268

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23268

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.