RISC-Interacting Clearing 3’- 5’ Exoribonucleases (RICEs) degrade uridylated cleavage fragments to maintain functional RISC in Arabidopsis

  1. Zhonghui Zhang
  2. Fuqu Hu
  3. Min Woo Sung
  4. Chang Shu
  5. Claudia Castillo-González
  6. Hisashi Koiwa
  7. Guiliang Tang
  8. Marty Dickman
  9. Pingwei Li  Is a corresponding author
  10. Xiuren Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Texas A&M University, United States
  2. Michigan Technological University, United States

Abstract

RNA-induced Silencing Complex (RISC) is composed of miRNAs and AGO proteins. AGOs use miRNAs as guides to slice target mRNAs to produce truncated 5' and 3' RNA fragments. The 5' cleaved RNA fragments are marked with uridylation for degradation. Here, we identified novel cofactors of Arabidopsis AGOs, named RICE1 and RICE2. RICE proteins specifically degraded single-strand (ss) RNAs in vitro; but neither miRNAs nor miRNA*s in vivo. RICE1 exhibited a DnaQ-like exonuclease fold and formed a homohexamer with the active sites located at the interfaces between RICE1 subunits. Notably, ectopic expression of catalytically-inactive RICE1 not only significantly reduced miRNA levels; but also increased 5' cleavage RISC fragments with extended uridine tails. We conclude that RICEs act to degrade uridylated 5’ products of AGO cleavage to maintain functional RISC. Our study also suggests a possible link between decay of cleaved target mRNAs and miRNA stability in RISC.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Zhang Z
    2. Zhang X
    (2017) small RNAs in RICE mutants
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE96951).
    1. Min Woo Sung
    2. Pingwei Li
    3. and Xiuren Zhang
    (2017) protein structure of RICE1
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no. 5V5F).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhonghui Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Fuqu Hu

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Min Woo Sung

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chang Shu

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Claudia Castillo-González

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hisashi Koiwa

    Department of Horticulture, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guiliang Tang

    Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marty Dickman

    Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6091-6921
  9. Pingwei Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    For correspondence
    pingwei@tamu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xiuren Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    For correspondence
    xiuren.zhang@tamu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8982-2999

Funding

National Science Foundation (CAREER MCB-1253369)

  • Xiuren Zhang

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP160822)

  • Xiuren Zhang

The authors declare that there was no funding for this work.

Copyright

© 2017, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,303
    views
  • 717
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhonghui Zhang
  2. Fuqu Hu
  3. Min Woo Sung
  4. Chang Shu
  5. Claudia Castillo-González
  6. Hisashi Koiwa
  7. Guiliang Tang
  8. Marty Dickman
  9. Pingwei Li
  10. Xiuren Zhang
(2017)
RISC-Interacting Clearing 3’- 5’ Exoribonucleases (RICEs) degrade uridylated cleavage fragments to maintain functional RISC in Arabidopsis
eLife 6:e24466.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24466

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24466

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.