The interactome of the copper transporter ATP7A belongs to a network of neurodevelopmental and neurodegeneration factors

  1. Heather S Comstra
  2. Jacob McArthy
  3. Samantha Rudin-Rush
  4. Cortnie Hartwig
  5. Avanti Gokhale
  6. Stephanie A Zlatic
  7. Jessica B Blackburn
  8. Erica Werner
  9. Michael Petris
  10. Priya D'Souza
  11. Parinya Panuwet
  12. Dana Boyd Barr
  13. Vladimir Lupashin
  14. Alysia Vrailas-Mortimer  Is a corresponding author
  15. Victor Faundez  Is a corresponding author
  1. Emory University, United States
  2. Illinois State University, United States
  3. Agnes Scott College, United States
  4. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States
  5. University of Missouri, United States

Abstract

Genetic and environmental factors, such as metals, interact to determine neurological traits. We reasoned that interactomes of molecules handling metals in neurons should include novel metal homeostasis pathways. We focused on copper and its transporter ATP7A because ATP7A null mutations cause neurodegeneration. We performed ATP7A immunoaffinity chromatography and identified 541 proteins co-isolating with ATP7A. The ATP7A interactome concentrated gene products implicated in neurodegeneration and neurodevelopmental disorders, including subunits of the Golgi-localized conserved oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex. COG null cells possess altered content and subcellular localization of ATP7A and CTR1 (SLC31A1), the transporter required for copper uptake, as well as decreased total cellular copper, and impaired copper-dependent metabolic responses. Changes in the expression of ATP7A and COG subunits in Drosophila neurons altered synapse development in larvae and copper-induced mortality of adult flies. We conclude that the ATP7A interactome encompasses a novel COG-dependent mechanism to specify neuronal development and survival.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Heather S Comstra

    Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jacob McArthy

    School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Samantha Rudin-Rush

    Department of Chemistry, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cortnie Hartwig

    Department of Chemistry, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Avanti Gokhale

    Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stephanie A Zlatic

    Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jessica B Blackburn

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Erica Werner

    Department of Biochemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michael Petris

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Priya D'Souza

    Department of Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Parinya Panuwet

    Department of Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dana Boyd Barr

    Department of Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Vladimir Lupashin

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2350-1962
  14. Alysia Vrailas-Mortimer

    School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, United States
    For correspondence
    avraila@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Victor Faundez

    Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    For correspondence
    vfaunde@emory.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2114-5271

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS088503)

  • Victor Faundez

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK093386)

  • Michael Petris

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM083144)

  • Vladimir Lupashin

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30 ES019776)

  • Dana Boyd Barr

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Comstra et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,269
    views
  • 634
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Heather S Comstra
  2. Jacob McArthy
  3. Samantha Rudin-Rush
  4. Cortnie Hartwig
  5. Avanti Gokhale
  6. Stephanie A Zlatic
  7. Jessica B Blackburn
  8. Erica Werner
  9. Michael Petris
  10. Priya D'Souza
  11. Parinya Panuwet
  12. Dana Boyd Barr
  13. Vladimir Lupashin
  14. Alysia Vrailas-Mortimer
  15. Victor Faundez
(2017)
The interactome of the copper transporter ATP7A belongs to a network of neurodevelopmental and neurodegeneration factors
eLife 6:e24722.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24722

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24722

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Deb Sankar Banerjee, Shiladitya Banerjee
    Research Article

    Accurate regulation of centrosome size is essential for ensuring error-free cell division, and dysregulation of centrosome size has been linked to various pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. While a universally accepted model for centrosome size regulation is lacking, prior theoretical and experimental works suggest a centrosome growth model involving autocatalytic assembly of the pericentriolar material. Here, we show that the autocatalytic assembly model fails to explain the attainment of equal centrosome sizes, which is crucial for error-free cell division. Incorporating latest experimental findings into the molecular mechanisms governing centrosome assembly, we introduce a new quantitative theory for centrosome growth involving catalytic assembly within a shared pool of enzymes. Our model successfully achieves robust size equality between maturing centrosome pairs, mirroring cooperative growth dynamics observed in experiments. To validate our theoretical predictions, we compare them with available experimental data and demonstrate the broad applicability of the catalytic growth model across different organisms, which exhibit distinct growth dynamics and size scaling characteristics.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.