Expression of SREBP-1c requires SREBP-2-mediated generation of a sterol ligand for LXR in livers of mice

  1. Shunxing Rong
  2. Víctor A Cortés
  3. Shirya Rashid
  4. Norma N Anderson
  5. Jeffrey G McDonald
  6. Guosheng Liang
  7. Young-Ah Moon
  8. Robert E Hammer
  9. Jay D Horton  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  2. North South University, Bangladesh
  3. Inha University College of Medicine, Korea (South), Republic of

Abstract

The synthesis of cholesterol and fatty acids (FA) in liver is independently regulated by SREBP-2 and SREBP-1c, respectively. Here we genetically deleted Srebf-2 from hepatocytes and confirmed that SREBP-2 regulates all genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis, the LDL receptor, and PCSK9; a secreted protein that degrades LDL receptors in liver. Surprisingly, we found that elimination of Srebf-2 in hepatocytes of mice also markedly reduced SREBP-1c and the expression of all genes involved in FA and triglyceride synthesis that are normally regulated by SREBP-1c. The nuclear receptor LXR is necessary for Srebf-1c transcription. The deletion of Srebf-2 and subsequent lower sterol synthesis in hepatocytes eliminated the production of an endogenous sterol ligand required for LXR activity and SREBP-1c expression. These studies demonstrate that cholesterol and FA synthesis in hepatocytes are coupled and that flux through the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway is required for maximal SREBP-1c expression and high rates of FA synthesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shunxing Rong

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Víctor A Cortés

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shirya Rashid

    Department of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Norma N Anderson

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jeffrey G McDonald

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Guosheng Liang

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Young-Ah Moon

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Inha University College of Medicine, Inharo, Korea (South), Republic of
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Robert E Hammer

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jay D Horton

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    Jay.Horton@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7778-1074

Funding

National Institutes of Health (HL-20948)

  • Jay D Horton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed with approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee at UT Southwestern.

Copyright

© 2017, Rong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,001
    views
  • 1,102
    downloads
  • 104
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shunxing Rong
  2. Víctor A Cortés
  3. Shirya Rashid
  4. Norma N Anderson
  5. Jeffrey G McDonald
  6. Guosheng Liang
  7. Young-Ah Moon
  8. Robert E Hammer
  9. Jay D Horton
(2017)
Expression of SREBP-1c requires SREBP-2-mediated generation of a sterol ligand for LXR in livers of mice
eLife 6:e25015.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25015

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25015

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Martina Rudgalvyte, Zehan Hu ... Dominique A Glauser
    Research Article

    Thermal nociception in Caenorhabditis elegans is regulated by the Ca²+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase CMK-1, but its downstream effectors have remained unclear. Here, we combined in vitro kinase assays with mass-spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics to identify hundreds of CMK-1 substrates, including the calcineurin A subunit TAX-6, phosphorylated within its conserved regulatory domain. Genetic and pharmacological analyses reveal multiple antagonistic interactions between CMK-1 and calcineurin signaling in modulating both naive thermal responsiveness and adaptation to repeated noxious stimuli. Cell-specific manipulations indicate that CMK-1 acts in AFD and ASER thermo-sensory neurons, while TAX-6 functions in FLP thermo-sensory neurons and downstream interneurons. Since CMK-1 and TAX-6 act in distinct cell types, the phosphorylation observed in vitro might not directly underlie the behavioral phenotype. Instead, the opposing effects seem to arise from their distributed roles within the sensory circuit. Overall, our study provides (1) a resource of candidate CMK-1 targets for further dissecting CaM kinase signaling and (2) evidence of a previously unrecognized, circuit-level antagonism between CMK-1 and calcineurin pathways. These findings highlight a complex interplay of signaling modules that modulate thermal nociception and adaptation, offering new insights into potentially conserved mechanisms that shape nociceptive plasticity and pain (de)sensitization in more complex nervous systems.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Mengjia Li, Hengchao Zhang ... Lixiang Chen
    Research Article

    Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is the key enzyme that can modulate cellular metabolism, epigenetic modification, and redox homeostasis. Gain-of-function mutations and decreased expression of IDH1 have been demonstrated to be associated with pathogenesis of various myeloid malignancies characterized by ineffective erythropoiesis, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the function and mechanism of IDH1 in human erythropoiesis still remains unclear. Here, utilizing the human erythropoiesis system, we present an evidence of IDH1-mediated chromatin state reprogramming besides its well-characterized metabolism effects. We found that knockdown IDH1 induced chromatin reorganization and subsequently led to abnormalities biological events in erythroid precursors, which could not be rescued by addition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers or supplementation of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG).We further revealed that knockdown IDH1 induces genome-wide changes in distribution and intensity of multiple histone marks, among which H3K79me3 was identified as a critical factor in chromatin state reprogramming. Integrated analysis of ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and RNA-seq recognized that SIRT1 was the key gene affected by IDH1 deficiency. Thus, our current work provided novel insights for further clarifying fundamental biological function of IDH1 which has substantial implications for an in-depth understanding of pathogenesis of diseases with IDH1 dysfunction and accordingly development of therapeutic strategies.