Dynamics of genomic innovation in the unicellular ancestry of animals

  1. Xavier Grau-Bové  Is a corresponding author
  2. Guifré Torruella
  3. Stuart Donachie
  4. Hiroshi Suga
  5. Guy Leonard
  6. Thomas A Richards
  7. Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Spain
  2. Université Paris-Sud/Paris-Saclay, France
  3. University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, United States
  4. Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Japan
  5. Living Systems Institute, United Kingdom
  6. University of Exeter, United Kingdom

Abstract

Which genomic innovations underpinned the origin of multicellular animals is still an open debate. Here, we investigate this question by reconstructing the genome architecture and gene family diversity of ancestral premetazoans, aiming to date the emergence of animal-like traits. Our comparative analysis involves genomes from animals and their closest unicellular relatives (the Holozoa), including four new genomes: three Ichthyosporea and Corallochytrium limacisporum. Here we show that the earliest animals were shaped by dynamic changes in genome architecture before the emergence of multicellularity: an early burst of gene diversity in the ancestor of Holozoa, enriched in transcription factors and cell adhesion machinery, was followed by multiple and differently-timed episodes of synteny disruption, intron gain and genome expansions. Thus, the foundations of animal genome architecture were laid before the origin of complex multicellularity – highlighting the necessity of a unicellular perspective to understand early animal evolution.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xavier Grau-Bové

    Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    xavier.graubove@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1978-5824
  2. Guifré Torruella

    Unité d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079, Université Paris-Sud/Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6534-4758
  3. Stuart Donachie

    Department of Microbiology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hiroshi Suga

    Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Shobara, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Guy Leonard

    Department of Biosciences, Living Systems Institute, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4607-2064
  6. Thomas A Richards

    Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo

    Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    inaki.ruiz@multicellgenome.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6547-5304

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU2014-57779-P)

  • Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo

European Commission (ERC-2012-Co -616960)

  • Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU-2011-23434)

  • Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo

Generalitat de Catalunya (2014 SGR 619)

  • Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Grau-Bové et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,776
    views
  • 932
    downloads
  • 127
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xavier Grau-Bové
  2. Guifré Torruella
  3. Stuart Donachie
  4. Hiroshi Suga
  5. Guy Leonard
  6. Thomas A Richards
  7. Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo
(2017)
Dynamics of genomic innovation in the unicellular ancestry of animals
eLife 6:e26036.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26036

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26036

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.