Allosteric control of an asymmetric transduction in a G protein-coupled receptor heterodimer

  1. Junke Liu
  2. Zongyong Zhang
  3. David Moreno-Delgado
  4. James Dalton
  5. Xavier Rovira
  6. Ana Trapero
  7. Cyril Goudet
  8. Amadeu Llebaria
  9. Jesús Giraldo
  10. Qilin Yuan
  11. Philippe Rondard
  12. Siluo Huang  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jianfeng Liu  Is a corresponding author
  14. Jean-Philippe Pin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
  2. CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, France
  3. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain
  4. Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), Spain
  5. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain

Abstract

GPCRs play critical roles in cell communication. Although GPCRs can form heteromers, their role in signaling remains elusive. Here we used rat metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors as prototypical dimers to study the functional interaction between each subunit. mGluRs can form both constitutive homo- and heterodimers. Whereas both mGlu2 and mGlu4 couple to G proteins, G protein activation is mediated by mGlu4 heptahelical domain (HD) exclusively in mGlu2-4 heterodimers. Such asymmetric transduction results from the action of both the dimeric extracellular domain, and an allosteric activation by the partially-activated non-functional mGlu2 HD. G proteins activation by mGlu2 HD occurs if either the mGlu2 HD is occupied by a positive allosteric modulator or if mGlu4 HD is inhibited by a negative modulator. These data revealed an oriented asymmetry in mGlu heterodimers that can be controlled with allosteric modulators. They provide new insight on the allosteric interaction between subunits in a GPCR dimer.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Junke Liu

    Sino-France Laboratory of Cellular Signaling, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zongyong Zhang

    Sino-France Laboratory of Cellular Signaling, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. David Moreno-Delgado

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle (IGF), CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. James Dalton

    Institut de Neurociències and Unitat de Bioestadística, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5279-4581
  5. Xavier Rovira

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9764-9927
  6. Ana Trapero

    MCS, Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Synthesis, Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia, Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Cyril Goudet

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle (IGF), CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8255-3535
  8. Amadeu Llebaria

    MCS, Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Synthesis, Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8200-4827
  9. Jesús Giraldo

    Institut de Neurociències and Unitat de Bioestadística, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7082-4695
  10. Qilin Yuan

    Sino-France Laboratory of Cellular Signaling, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Philippe Rondard

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle (IGF), CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1134-2738
  12. Siluo Huang

    Sino-France Laboratory of Cellular Signaling, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    For correspondence
    slhuang@mail.hust.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jianfeng Liu

    Sino-France Laboratory of Cellular Signaling, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    For correspondence
    jfliu@mail.hust.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0284-8377
  14. Jean-Philippe Pin

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle (IGF), CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    jppin@igf.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1423-345X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31420103909)

  • Jianfeng Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100548)

  • Siluo Huang

The program of introducing talents of discipline to the university of the ministry of education of China (B08029)

  • Jianfeng Liu

Mérieux research grants program

  • Jianfeng Liu

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Jean-Philippe Pin

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

  • Jean-Philippe Pin

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20130326522)

  • Jean-Philippe Pin

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31711530146)

  • Jianfeng Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31511130131)

  • Jianfeng Liu

Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2014CFA010)

  • Junke Liu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,212
    views
  • 659
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Junke Liu
  2. Zongyong Zhang
  3. David Moreno-Delgado
  4. James Dalton
  5. Xavier Rovira
  6. Ana Trapero
  7. Cyril Goudet
  8. Amadeu Llebaria
  9. Jesús Giraldo
  10. Qilin Yuan
  11. Philippe Rondard
  12. Siluo Huang
  13. Jianfeng Liu
  14. Jean-Philippe Pin
(2017)
Allosteric control of an asymmetric transduction in a G protein-coupled receptor heterodimer
eLife 6:e26985.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26985

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26985

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.