Mechanism of environmentally driven conformational changes that modulate H-NS DNA bridging activity

  1. Ramon A van der Valk
  2. Jocelyne Vreede
  3. Liang Qin
  4. Geri F Moolenaar
  5. Andreas Hofmann
  6. Nora Goosen
  7. Remus T Dame  Is a corresponding author
  1. Leiden University, Netherlands
  2. University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
  3. University of Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Bacteria frequently need to adapt to altered environmental conditions. Adaptation requires changes in gene expression, often mediated by global regulators of transcription. The nucleoid-associated protein H‑NS is a key global regulator in Gram-negative bacteria, and is believed to be a crucial player in bacterial chromatin organization via its DNA bridging activity. H‑NS activity in vivo is modulated by physico-chemical factors (osmolarity, pH, temperature) and interaction partners. Mechanistically it is unclear how functional modulation of H-NS by such factors is achieved. Here, we show that a diverse spectrum of H-NS modulators alter the DNA bridging activity of H-NS. Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abrupt switch between a bridging and non-bridging DNA binding mode. Similarly, synergistic and antagonistic co-regulators modulate the DNA bridging efficiency. Structural studies suggest a conserved mechanism: H-NS switches between a "closed" and an "open", bridging competent, conformation driven by environmental cues and interaction partners.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ramon A van der Valk

    Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jocelyne Vreede

    Computational Chemistry, van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Liang Qin

    Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Geri F Moolenaar

    Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andreas Hofmann

    Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nora Goosen

    Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Remus T Dame

    Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    rtdame@chem.leidenuniv.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9863-1692

Funding

NanonextNL of the Government of the Netherland and 130 partners

  • Ramon A van der Valk
  • Geri F Moolenaar
  • Remus T Dame

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (VIDI 864.08.001)

  • Ramon A van der Valk
  • Geri F Moolenaar
  • Nora Goosen
  • Remus T Dame

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Athena grant 700.58.802)

  • Jocelyne Vreede

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0014/2014)

  • Andreas Hofmann
  • Remus T Dame

China Scholarship Council (No. 201506880001)

  • Liang Qin

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (VICI 016.160.613)

  • Remus T Dame

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, van der Valk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,000
    views
  • 523
    downloads
  • 97
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ramon A van der Valk
  2. Jocelyne Vreede
  3. Liang Qin
  4. Geri F Moolenaar
  5. Andreas Hofmann
  6. Nora Goosen
  7. Remus T Dame
(2017)
Mechanism of environmentally driven conformational changes that modulate H-NS DNA bridging activity
eLife 6:e27369.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27369

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27369

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.