Electrical activity controls area-specific expression of neuronal apoptosis in the developing mouse cerebral cortex

  1. Oriane Blanquie
  2. Jenq-Wei Yang  Is a corresponding author
  3. Werner Kilb  Is a corresponding author
  4. Salim Sharopov  Is a corresponding author
  5. Anne Sinning  Is a corresponding author
  6. Heiko J Luhmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany

Abstract

Programmed cell death widely but heterogeneously affects the developing brain, causing the loss of up to 50% of neurons in rodents. However, whether this heterogeneity originates from neuronal identity and/or network-dependent processes is unknown. Here, we report that the primary motor cortex (M1) and primary somatosensory cortex (S1), two adjacent but functionally distinct areas, display striking differences in density of apoptotic neurons during the early postnatal period. These differences in rate of apoptosis negatively correlate with region-dependent levels of activity. Disrupting this activity either pharmacologically or by electrical stimulation alters the spatial pattern of apoptosis and sensory deprivation leads to exacerbated amounts of apoptotic neurons in the corresponding functional area of the neocortex. Thus, our data demonstrate that spontaneous and periphery-driven activity patterns are important for the structural and functional maturation of the neocortex by refining the final number of cortical neurons in a region-dependent manner.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Oriane Blanquie

    Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jenq-Wei Yang

    Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    yangj@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Werner Kilb

    Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    wkilb@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Salim Sharopov

    Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    shsalim@mail.ru
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anne Sinning

    Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    asinning@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Heiko J Luhmann

    Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    luhmann@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7934-8661

Funding

German Research Foundation (Collaborative Research Center 1080)

  • Anne Sinning
  • Heiko J Luhmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with National and European (86/609/EEC) laws for the use of animals in research and were approved by the local ethical committee (Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz 23.177-07/G 10-1-010).

Copyright

© 2017, Blanquie et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,780
    views
  • 581
    downloads
  • 96
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Oriane Blanquie
  2. Jenq-Wei Yang
  3. Werner Kilb
  4. Salim Sharopov
  5. Anne Sinning
  6. Heiko J Luhmann
(2017)
Electrical activity controls area-specific expression of neuronal apoptosis in the developing mouse cerebral cortex
eLife 6:e27696.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27696

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27696

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Anastasiia Lozovska, Ana Casaca ... Moises Mallo
    Research Article

    During the trunk to tail transition the mammalian embryo builds the outlets for the intestinal and urogenital tracts, lays down the primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia, and switches from the epiblast/primitive streak (PS) to the tail bud as the driver of axial extension. Genetic and molecular data indicate that Tgfbr1 is a key regulator of the trunk to tail transition. Tgfbr1 has been shown to control the switch of the neuromesodermal competent cells from the epiblast to the chordoneural hinge to generate the tail bud. We now show that in mouse embryos Tgfbr1 signaling also controls the remodeling of the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) and of the embryonic endoderm associated with the trunk to tail transition. In the absence of Tgfbr1, the two LPM layers do not converge at the end of the trunk, extending instead as separate layers until the caudal embryonic extremity, and failing to activate markers of primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia. The vascular remodeling involving the dorsal aorta and the umbilical artery leading to the connection between embryonic and extraembryonic circulation was also affected in the Tgfbr1 mutant embryos. Similar alterations in the LPM and vascular system were also observed in Isl1 null mutants, indicating that this factor acts in the regulatory cascade downstream of Tgfbr1 in LPM-derived tissues. In addition, in the absence of Tgfbr1 the embryonic endoderm fails to expand to form the endodermal cloaca and to extend posteriorly to generate the tail gut. We present evidence suggesting that the remodeling activity of Tgfbr1 in the LPM and endoderm results from the control of the posterior PS fate after its regression during the trunk to tail transition. Our data, together with previously reported observations, place Tgfbr1 at the top of the regulatory processes controlling the trunk to tail transition.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Odessa R Yabut, Jessica Arela ... Samuel J Pleasure
    Research Article

    Mutations in Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway genes, for example, Suppressor of Fused (SUFU), drive granule neuron precursors (GNP) to form medulloblastomas (MBSHH). However, how different molecular lesions in the Shh pathway drive transformation is frequently unclear, and SUFU mutations in the cerebellum seem distinct. In this study, we show that fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF5) signaling is integral for many infantile MBSHH cases and that FGF5 expression is uniquely upregulated in infantile MBSHH tumors. Similarly, mice lacking SUFU (Sufu-cKO) ectopically express Fgf5 specifically along the secondary fissure where GNPs harbor preneoplastic lesions and show that FGFR signaling is also ectopically activated in this region. Treatment with an FGFR antagonist rescues the severe GNP hyperplasia and restores cerebellar architecture. Thus, direct inhibition of FGF signaling may be a promising and novel therapeutic candidate for infantile MBSHH.