Abstract

Recent functional, proteomic and ribosome profiling studies in eukaryotes have concurrently demonstrated the translation of alternative open reading frames (altORFs) in addition to annotated protein coding sequences (CDSs). We show that a large number of small proteins could in fact be coded by these altORFs. The putative alternative proteins translated from altORFs have orthologs in many species and contain functional domains. Evolutionary analyses indicate that altORFs often show more extreme conservation patterns than their CDSs. Thousands of alternative proteins are detected in proteomic datasets by reanalysis using a database containing predicted alternative proteins. This is illustrated with specific examples, including altMiD51, a 70 amino acid mitochondrial fission-promoting protein encoded in MiD51/Mief1/SMCR7L, a gene encoding an annotated protein promoting mitochondrial fission. Our results suggest that many genes are multicoding genes and code for a large protein and one or several small proteins.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sondos Samandi

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Annie V Roy

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Vivian Delcourt

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jean-François Lucier

    Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jules Gagnon

    Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maxime C Beaudoin

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Benoît Vanderperre

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marc-André Breton

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Julie Motard

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jean-François Jacques

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0465-0313
  11. Mylène Brunelle

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Isabelle Gagnon-Arsenault

    Département de biologie, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Isabelle Fournier

    Prism INSERM U1192, Université de Lille, Lille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1096-5044
  14. Aïda Ouangraoua

    Department of Computer Science, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Darel J Hunting

    Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Alan A Cohen

    Department of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Christian R Landry

    Département de biologie, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Michelle S Scott

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Xavier Roucou

    Department of Biochemistry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
    For correspondence
    xavier.roucou@usherbrooke.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9370-5584

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-137056)

  • Xavier Roucou

Canada Research Chairs

  • Aïda Ouangraoua
  • Christian R Landry
  • Xavier Roucou

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies (2015-PR-181807)

  • Christian R Landry
  • Xavier Roucou

Merck Sharp and Dohme

  • Xavier Roucou

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-136962)

  • Xavier Roucou

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Samandi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,899
    views
  • 1,013
    downloads
  • 103
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sondos Samandi
  2. Annie V Roy
  3. Vivian Delcourt
  4. Jean-François Lucier
  5. Jules Gagnon
  6. Maxime C Beaudoin
  7. Benoît Vanderperre
  8. Marc-André Breton
  9. Julie Motard
  10. Jean-François Jacques
  11. Mylène Brunelle
  12. Isabelle Gagnon-Arsenault
  13. Isabelle Fournier
  14. Aïda Ouangraoua
  15. Darel J Hunting
  16. Alan A Cohen
  17. Christian R Landry
  18. Michelle S Scott
  19. Xavier Roucou
(2017)
Deep transcriptome annotation enables the discovery and functional characterization of cryptic small proteins
eLife 6:e27860.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27860

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27860

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.