1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
  2. Genetics and Genomics

Multiplexed genetic engineering of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using CRISPR/Cas9 and AAV6

  1. Rasmus O Bak
  2. Daniel P Dever
  3. Andreas Reinisch
  4. David Cruz Hernandez
  5. Ravindra Majeti  Is a corresponding author
  6. Matthew H Porteus  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27873
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Rasmus O Bak
  2. Daniel P Dever
  3. Andreas Reinisch
  4. David Cruz Hernandez
  5. Ravindra Majeti
  6. Matthew H Porteus
(2017)
Multiplexed genetic engineering of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using CRISPR/Cas9 and AAV6
eLife 6:e27873.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27873
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Precise and efficient manipulation of genes is crucial for understanding the molecular mechanisms that govern human hematopoiesis and for developing novel therapies for diseases of the blood and immune system. Current methods do not enable precise engineering of complex genotypes that can be easily tracked in a mixed population of cells. We describe a method to multiplex homologous recombination (HR) in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and primary human T cells by combining rAAV6 donor delivery and the CRISPR/Cas9 system delivered as ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). In addition, the use of reporter genes allows FACS-purification and tracking of cells that have had multiple alleles or loci modified by HR. We believe this method will enable broad applications not only to the study of human hematopoietic gene function and networks, but also to perform sophisticated synthetic biology to develop innovative engineered stem cell-based therapeutics.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rasmus O Bak

    Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7383-0297

  2. Daniel P Dever

    Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Andreas Reinisch

    Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. David Cruz Hernandez

    Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Ravindra Majeti

    Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    rmajeti@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    Ravindra Majeti, has equity and consults for Forty Seven Inc..

  6. Matthew H Porteus

    Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    mporteus@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    Matthew H Porteus, has equity and consults for CRISPR Therapeutics..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3850-4648

Funding

Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF-1333-00106B)

  • Rasmus O Bak

Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF-1331-00735B)

  • Rasmus O Bak

National Institutes of Health (R01- AI097320)

  • Matthew H Porteus

National Institutes of Health (R01-AI120766)

  • Matthew H Porteus

Stanford Child Health Research Institute (Postdoctoral Award)

  • Daniel P Dever

Austrian Research Council (Erwin Schroedinger Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Andreas Reinisch

Amon G. Carter Foundation

  • Matthew H Porteus

Laurie Kraus Lacob Faculty Scholar Award in Pediatric Translational Research (Scholar Award)

  • Matthew H Porteus

National Institutes of Health (PN2EY018244)

  • Matthew H Porteus

Stanford Ludwig Center for Cancer Stem Cell Research

  • Ravindra Majeti

National Institutes of Health (R01-CA188055)

  • Ravindra Majeti

New York Stem Cell Foundation (Robertson Investigator)

  • Ravindra Majeti

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The experimental protocol was approved by Stanford University's Administrative Panel on Lab Animal Care (IACUC 25065).

Copyright

© 2017, Bak et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,251
    views
  • 1,712
    downloads
  • 90
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rasmus O Bak
  2. Daniel P Dever
  3. Andreas Reinisch
  4. David Cruz Hernandez
  5. Ravindra Majeti
  6. Matthew H Porteus
(2017)
Multiplexed genetic engineering of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using CRISPR/Cas9 and AAV6
eLife 6:e27873.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27873

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27873

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine

    Glial ferritin maintains neural stem cells via transporting iron required for self-renewal in Drosophila

    Zhixin Ma, Wenshu Wang ... Su Wang
    Research Article

    Stem cell niche is critical for regulating the behavior of stem cells. Drosophila neural stem cells (Neuroblasts, NBs) are encased by glial niche cells closely, but it still remains unclear whether glial niche cells can regulate the self-renewal and differentiation of NBs. Here, we show that ferritin produced by glia, cooperates with Zip13 to transport iron into NBs for the energy production, which is essential to the self-renewal and proliferation of NBs. The knockdown of glial ferritin encoding genes causes energy shortage in NBs via downregulating aconitase activity and NAD+ level, which leads to the low proliferation and premature differentiation of NBs mediated by Prospero entering nuclei. More importantly, ferritin is a potential target for tumor suppression. In addition, the level of glial ferritin production is affected by the status of NBs, establishing a bicellular iron homeostasis. In this study, we demonstrate that glial cells are indispensable to maintain the self-renewal of NBs, unveiling a novel role of the NB glial niche during brain development.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine

    Epigenetic insights into GABAergic development in Dravet Syndrome iPSC and therapeutic implications

    Jens Schuster, Xi Lu ... Xingqi Chen
    Research Article

    Dravet syndrome (DS) is a devastating early-onset refractory epilepsy syndrome caused by variants in the SCN1A gene. A disturbed GABAergic interneuron function is implicated in the progression to DS but the underlying developmental and pathophysiological mechanisms remain elusive, in particularly at the chromatin level. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from DS cases and healthy donors were used to model disease-associated epigenetic abnormalities of GABAergic development. Chromatin accessibility was assessed at multiple time points (Day 0, Day 19, Day 35, and Day 65) of GABAergic differentiation. Additionally, the effects of the commonly used anti-seizure drug valproic acid (VPA) on chromatin accessibility were elucidated in GABAergic cells. The distinct dynamics in the chromatin profile of DS iPSC predicted accelerated early GABAergic development, evident at D19, and diverged further from the pattern in control iPSC with continued differentiation, indicating a disrupted GABAergic maturation. Exposure to VPA at D65 reshaped the chromatin landscape at a variable extent in different iPSC-lines and rescued the observed dysfunctional development of some DS iPSC-GABA. The comprehensive investigation on the chromatin landscape of GABAergic differentiation in DS-patient iPSC offers valuable insights into the epigenetic dysregulations associated with interneuronal dysfunction in DS. Moreover, the detailed analysis of the chromatin changes induced by VPA in iPSC-GABA holds the potential to improve the development of personalized and targeted anti-epileptic therapies.