Aneuploidy as a cause of impaired chromatin silencing and mating-type specification in budding yeast

  1. Wahid A Mulla
  2. Chris W Seidel
  3. Jin Zhu
  4. Hung-Ji Tsai
  5. Sarah E Smith
  6. Pushpendra Singh
  7. William D Bradford
  8. Scott McCroskey
  9. Anjali R Nelliat
  10. Juliana Conkright
  11. Allison Peak
  12. Kathryn E Malanowski
  13. Anoja G Perera
  14. Rong Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Center for Cell Dynamics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States
  3. Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States
  4. Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, United States
7 figures and 7 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 4 supplements
Aneuploid yeast strains show defective silencing at HML, subtelomeric, and rDNA chromatin regions.

(A) The design of a microscopy-based screen to isolate karyotypically stable aneuploid strains, generated by inducing triploid meiosis, that exhibit defective silencing of the HML locus. (B) …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Heterogeneous expression pattern of YFPand YFPsignals within the aneuploid population was not due to the karyotypic variations.

(A) A schematic representation of the genetic manipulations used to generate isogenic diploid and triploid strains from the parental WT haploid strain, which has nuclear localization sequence-tagged …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.003
Figure 1—Video 1
Transitions between repression and derepression of the HML locus in proliferating cell lineages with the following karyotypes: Gain of III, III, X.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.004
Figure 1—Video 2
Transitions between repression and derepression of the HML locus in proliferating cell lineages with the following karyotypes: Loss of I, V, VII, VIII, XI (basal ploidy, 2N).
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.005
Figure 1-—Video 3
Transitions between repression and derepression of the HML locus in proliferating cell lineages with the following karyotypes: Gain of I, X, XII, XIII.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.006
Gain of Chr X is sufficient to disrupt silencing.

(A) The box plot shows mean YFP intensities, determined by microscopy of 125 individual cells for each of the following strains: WT haploid, Δsir1, and two parental aneuploid strains (Gain of III, …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.007
Cells with a gain of Chromosome X show abnormal growth arrest in response to α-factor.

(A) The plots show FACS-based DNA content analysis, indicating cell cycle stage, in MATa WT haploid, Δsir1, and disome X strains. Left panels represent untreated cells; right panels represent …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.008
HM desilencing in disome X cells correlates with increased H4K16 acetylation and reduced Sir2 enrichment across HM loci.

(A–B) Bottom: The plots show levels of H4K16 acetylation across the HML (A) and HMR (B) loci in disome X and Δsir1 strains relative to WT haploid cells, determined using anti-H4K16ac chromatin …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.009
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Disome X cells display abnormal Sir2 protein localizations and lack proper perinuclear positioning of silenced chromatin region.

(A) Representative fluorescent images are shown for Sir2-mTurq and the HML::YFP reporter in WT haploid and disome X strains. White boxes in the top panels display magnified images (insets) of …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.010
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
SIR2 is not haploinsufficient for HML silencing

(A–B) Western blot analysis of total Sir2 protein by using anti-Sir2 and anti-α-PGK (loading control) antibodies for the following strains: WT haploid, Δsir1, disome X, and Δsir2/SIR2. The total …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.011
Figure 6 with 1 supplement
Genome-wide analysis shows that disome X cells upregulate histone modifications and transcription of typically silenced genes.

(A–B) Gene expression changes determined by RNA-seq are plotted on the X-axis as log2 fold change (disome X/WT haploid), and H3K4me3 (A) and H3K79me3 (B) histone modification enrichments determined …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.012
Figure 6—source data 1

Source data for genome-wide analysis performed in Figure 6.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.014
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
No difference in gene expression between disome X and haploid populations for sets of genes that had H3K4me3 and H3K79me3 modifications only in one strain or the other.

(A) Expression levels determined by RNA-seq experiments are plotted as log10 of the RPKM values on the X-axis, and H3K4me3 enrichment determined by ChIP-seq analysis is plotted as log10 of the …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.013
The combined increase in copy number of at least four genes on Chr X causes HML silencing defects.

(A) Representative images of YFP fluorescence from the HML::YFP reporter in Δsir1, disome X, and WT haploid cells with a single extra copy of the indicated genes, where relevant. Scale bar, 4 µm. (B)…

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.015
Figure 7—source data 1

Source data for gain-of-funtion screen.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.016

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

The karyotypes of stable aneuploid strains that exhibit defective silencing of YFP at the HML locus obtained from a microscopy-based screen are listed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.017
Supplementary file 2

The number of genes plotted for each category in Figure 6A–B and Figure 6—figure supplement 1 is listed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.018
Supplementary file 3

A list of fifteen Chr X genes that cause the strongest silencing defects as a result of increased copy number.

Genes leading to the loss of HML::YFP silencing when copy number is increased are listed with a functional description and a desilencing score. The desilencing score was calculated as the average YFP intensity in WT haploid strains carrying individual candidate genes on a low-copy (centromeric) plasmid, relative to the average YFP fluorescence in the disome X strain. Average YFP intensities were calculated using three biological replicates per strain.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.019
Supplementary file 4

List of yeast strains used in this study, and not listed in Supplementary file 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.020
Supplementary file 5

List of plasmids used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.021
Supplementary file 6

List of oligos used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.022
Transparent reporting form
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27991.023

Download links