Inferring multi-scale neural mechanisms with brain network modelling

  1. Michael Schirner
  2. Anthony Randal McIntosh
  3. Viktor Jirsa
  4. Gustavo Deco
  5. Petra Ritter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  2. University of Toronto, Canada
  3. Aix-Marseille Université, France
  4. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

Abstract

The neurophysiological processes underlying non-invasive brain activity measurements are incompletely understood. Here, we developed a connectome-based brain network model that integrates individual structural and functional data with neural population dynamics to support multi-scale neurophysiological inference. Simulated populations were linked by structural connectivity and, as a novelty, driven by electroencephalography (EEG) source activity. Simulations not only predicted subjects' individual resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series and spatial network topologies over 20 minutes of activity, but more importantly, they also revealed precise neurophysiological mechanisms that underlie and link six empirical observations from different scales and modalities: (1) resting-state fMRI oscillations, (2) functional connectivity networks, (3) excitation-inhibition balance, (4, 5) inverse relationships between α-rhythms, spike-firing and fMRI on short and long time scales, and (6) fMRI power-law scaling. These findings underscore the potential of this new modelling framework for general inference and integration of neurophysiological knowledge to complement empirical studies.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Schirner M
    2. McIntosh AR
    3. Jirsa V
    4. Deco G
    5. Ritter P
    (2017) Hybrid Brain Model data
    Available at Open Science Framework Repository under a CC0 1.0 Universal license.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael Schirner

    Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8227-8476
  2. Anthony Randal McIntosh

    Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Viktor Jirsa

    Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Gustavo Deco

    Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Petra Ritter

    Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    petra.ritter@charite.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4643-4782

Funding

James S. McDonnell Foundation (Brain Network Recovery Group JSMF22002082)

  • Anthony Randal McIntosh
  • Viktor Jirsa
  • Gustavo Deco
  • Petra Ritter

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Bernstein Focus State Dependencies of Learning 01GQ0971-5)

  • Petra Ritter

European Union Horizon2020 (ERC Consolidator grant BrainModes 683049)

  • Petra Ritter

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (US-German Collaboration in Computational Neuroscience 01GQ1504A)

  • Petra Ritter

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Max-Planck Society)

  • Petra Ritter

John von Neumann Institute for Computing at Jülich Supercomputing Centre (Grant NIC#8344 & NIC#10276)

  • Petra Ritter

Stiftung Charité/Private Exzellenzinitiative Johanna Quandt and Berlin Institute of Health

  • Petra Ritter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Research was performed in compliance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Written informed consent was provided by all subjects with an understanding of the study prior to data collection, and was approved by the local ethics committee in accordance with the institutional guidelines at Charité Hospital Berlin.

Copyright

© 2018, Schirner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,571
    views
  • 1,473
    downloads
  • 140
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael Schirner
  2. Anthony Randal McIntosh
  3. Viktor Jirsa
  4. Gustavo Deco
  5. Petra Ritter
(2018)
Inferring multi-scale neural mechanisms with brain network modelling
eLife 7:e28927.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28927

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28927

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Priya M Christensen, Jonathan Martin ... Kelli L Palmer
    Research Article

    Bacterial membranes are complex and dynamic, arising from an array of evolutionary pressures. One enzyme that alters membrane compositions through covalent lipid modification is MprF. We recently identified that Streptococcus agalactiae MprF synthesizes lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol (Lys-PG) from anionic PG, and a novel cationic lipid, lysyl-glucosyl-diacylglycerol (Lys-Glc-DAG), from neutral glycolipid Glc-DAG. This unexpected result prompted us to investigate whether Lys-Glc-DAG occurs in other MprF-containing bacteria, and whether other novel MprF products exist. Here, we studied protein sequence features determining MprF substrate specificity. First, pairwise analyses identified several streptococcal MprFs synthesizing Lys-Glc-DAG. Second, a restricted Boltzmann machine-guided approach led us to discover an entirely new substrate for MprF in Enterococcus, diglucosyl-diacylglycerol (Glc2-DAG), and an expanded set of organisms that modify glycolipid substrates using MprF. Overall, we combined the wealth of available sequence data with machine learning to model evolutionary constraints on MprF sequences across the bacterial domain, thereby identifying a novel cationic lipid.