Inferring multi-scale neural mechanisms with brain network modelling

  1. Michael Schirner
  2. Anthony Randal McIntosh
  3. Viktor Jirsa
  4. Gustavo Deco
  5. Petra Ritter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  2. University of Toronto, Canada
  3. Aix-Marseille Université, France
  4. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

Abstract

The neurophysiological processes underlying non-invasive brain activity measurements are incompletely understood. Here, we developed a connectome-based brain network model that integrates individual structural and functional data with neural population dynamics to support multi-scale neurophysiological inference. Simulated populations were linked by structural connectivity and, as a novelty, driven by electroencephalography (EEG) source activity. Simulations not only predicted subjects' individual resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series and spatial network topologies over 20 minutes of activity, but more importantly, they also revealed precise neurophysiological mechanisms that underlie and link six empirical observations from different scales and modalities: (1) resting-state fMRI oscillations, (2) functional connectivity networks, (3) excitation-inhibition balance, (4, 5) inverse relationships between α-rhythms, spike-firing and fMRI on short and long time scales, and (6) fMRI power-law scaling. These findings underscore the potential of this new modelling framework for general inference and integration of neurophysiological knowledge to complement empirical studies.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Schirner M
    2. McIntosh AR
    3. Jirsa V
    4. Deco G
    5. Ritter P
    (2017) Hybrid Brain Model data
    Available at Open Science Framework Repository under a CC0 1.0 Universal license.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael Schirner

    Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8227-8476
  2. Anthony Randal McIntosh

    Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Viktor Jirsa

    Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Gustavo Deco

    Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Petra Ritter

    Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    petra.ritter@charite.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4643-4782

Funding

James S. McDonnell Foundation (Brain Network Recovery Group JSMF22002082)

  • Anthony Randal McIntosh
  • Viktor Jirsa
  • Gustavo Deco
  • Petra Ritter

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Bernstein Focus State Dependencies of Learning 01GQ0971-5)

  • Petra Ritter

European Union Horizon2020 (ERC Consolidator grant BrainModes 683049)

  • Petra Ritter

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (US-German Collaboration in Computational Neuroscience 01GQ1504A)

  • Petra Ritter

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Max-Planck Society)

  • Petra Ritter

John von Neumann Institute for Computing at Jülich Supercomputing Centre (Grant NIC#8344 & NIC#10276)

  • Petra Ritter

Stiftung Charité/Private Exzellenzinitiative Johanna Quandt and Berlin Institute of Health

  • Petra Ritter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Research was performed in compliance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Written informed consent was provided by all subjects with an understanding of the study prior to data collection, and was approved by the local ethics committee in accordance with the institutional guidelines at Charité Hospital Berlin.

Copyright

© 2018, Schirner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,846
    views
  • 1,563
    downloads
  • 149
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael Schirner
  2. Anthony Randal McIntosh
  3. Viktor Jirsa
  4. Gustavo Deco
  5. Petra Ritter
(2018)
Inferring multi-scale neural mechanisms with brain network modelling
eLife 7:e28927.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28927

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28927

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.