1. Computational and Systems Biology
  2. Genetics and Genomics
Download icon

Intrinsic adaptive value and early fate of gene duplication revealed by a bottom-up approach

  1. Guillermo Rodrigo  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mario A Fares
  1. CSIC - UPV, Spain
Research Article
  • Cited 10
  • Views 1,698
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e29739 doi: 10.7554/eLife.29739

Abstract

The population genetic mechanisms governing the preservation of gene duplicates, especially in the critical very initial phase, have remained largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that gene duplication confers per se a weak selective advantage in scenarios of fitness trade-offs. Through a precise quantitative description of a model system, we show that a second gene copy serves to reduce gene expression inaccuracies derived from pervasive molecular noise and suboptimal gene regulation. We then reveal that such an accuracy in the phenotype yields a selective advantage in the order of 0.1% on average, which would allow the positive selection of gene duplication in populations with moderate/large sizes. This advantage is greater at higher noise levels and intermediate concentrations of the environmental molecule, when fitness trade-offs become more evident. Moreover, we discuss how the genome rearrangement rates greatly condition the eventual fixation of duplicates. Overall, our theoretical results highlight an original adaptive value for cells carrying new-born duplicates, broadly analyze the selective conditions that determine their early fates in different organisms, and reconcile population genetics with evolution by gene duplication.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guillermo Rodrigo

    Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, CSIC - UPV, Valencia, Spain
    For correspondence
    guillermo.rodrigo@csic.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1871-9617
  2. Mario A Fares

    Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, CSIC - UPV, Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU2015-66894-P)

  • Guillermo Rodrigo

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU2015-66073-P)

  • Mario A Fares

Generalitat Valenciana (GVA/2016/079)

  • Guillermo Rodrigo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Diethard Tautz, Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: June 20, 2017
  2. Accepted: January 4, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 5, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 17, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Rodrigo & Fares

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,698
    Page views
  • 230
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Lucy Ham et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Single-cell expression profiling opens up new vistas on cellular processes. Extensive cell-to-cell variability at the transcriptomic and proteomic level has been one of the stand-out observations. Because most experimental analyses are destructive we only have access to snapshot data of cellular states. This loss of temporal information presents significant challenges for inferring dynamics, as well as causes of cell-to-cell variability. In particular, we typically cannot separate dynamic variability from within cells (‘intrinsic noise’) from variability across the population (‘extrinsic noise’). Here, we make this non-identifiability mathematically precise, allowing us to identify new experimental set-ups that can assist in resolving this non-identifiability. We show that multiple generic reporters from the same biochemical pathways (e.g. mRNA and protein) can infer magnitudes of intrinsic and extrinsic transcriptional noise, identifying sources of heterogeneity. Stochastic simulations support our theory, and demonstrate that ‘pathway-reporters’ compare favourably to the well-known, but often difficult to implement, dual-reporter method.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cathy S Chen et al.
    Research Article

    Sex-based modulation of cognitive processes could set the stage for individual differences in vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders. While value-based decision making processes in particular have been proposed to be influenced by sex differences, the overall correct performance in decision making tasks often show variable or minimal differences across sexes. Computational tools allow us to uncover latent variables that define different decision making approaches, even in animals with similar correct performance. Here, we quantify sex differences in mice in the latent variables underlying behavior in a classic value-based decision making task: a restless 2-armed bandit. While male and female mice had similar accuracy, they achieved this performance via different patterns of exploration. Male mice tended to make more exploratory choices overall, largely because they appeared to get 'stuck' in exploration once they had started. Female mice tended to explore less but learned more quickly during exploration. Together, these results suggest that sex exerts stronger influences on decision making during periods of learning and exploration than during stable choices. Exploration during decision making is altered in people diagnosed with addictions, depression, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, pinpointing the neural mechanisms of exploration as a highly translational avenue for conferring sex-modulated vulnerability to neuropsychiatric diagnoses.