Neurons in the brain of a female mouse that respond to the scent of a given male become suppressed after mating.
Animals often need to remember their past encounters with other members of the same species. For many animals, including mice, smell plays a critical role in forming these social memories throughout their entire life (Keller et al., 2009). For example, a mouse pup must remember its mother’s scent (Sullivan et al., 1990), a juvenile mouse must learn the odors of its playmates (Smith, 1982), and an adult mouse needs to identify its offspring, social peers or mates (Dulac et al., 2014; Ben-Shaul et al., 2010; Bruce and Parrott, 1960).
Mice detect the scent of other mice partly via their vomeronasal organ, which is found between the nose and mouth (Halpern and Martínez-Marcos, 2003). The sensory neurons in this organ send signals to a part of the brain called the accessory olfactory bulb, which is in turn connected to the centers of the brain that influence social behaviors like aggression, parenting and mating (Choi et al., 2005). The neural circuits that trigger specific behaviors in response to odors are not exclusively hardwired. Rather, the function of these circuits is shaped by social experience; this is an example of a wider phenomenon referred to as neural plasticity (Shea et al., 2008; Citri and Malenka, 2008).
Now, in eLife, Ian Davison and colleagues – including Yuan Gao as the first author – report on a new form of neural plasticity seen in the accessory olfactory bulb of female mice (Gao et al., 2017). The study used mice in which recently activated neurons produce green fluorescent protein (GFP) and can be easily identified by a green glow. Gao et al. – who are based at Boston University and Mount Holyoke College – took female mice and introduced them to a male mouse. Some of the females were also allowed to mate with the male and some were not (Figure 1). Gao et al. then collected slices from the brains of the female mice and recorded how different neurons in the slices responded to electrical stimulation.
The experiments showed that, at first, recently active neurons (that is, those with GFP) were as excitable as the inactive or unresponsive neurons (those without GFP). This was true for the female mice who had mated and those that had not. However, GFP-positive neurons from mated females became dramatically less excitable when the stimulation was repeated, while the GFP-negative neurons remained largely unaffected. This difference was not seen in the unmated females, and indicates that mating triggers a change that makes activated neurons in the accessory olfactory bulb become less excitable in the future.
Next, Gao et al. compared the responses from two different kinds of neuron within the accessory olfactory bulb: mitral cells and granule cells. The mitral cells receive signals from sensory neurons and send signals to other centers of the brain, while the granule cells inhibit the mitral cells. Gao et al. saw that all the mitral cells were inhibited more after mating, and so inhibition could not explain why only the GFP-positive mitral cells became less excitable after mating. Changes in the strength of connections between the mitral cells and other neurons could also not explain the difference. Instead, it appears that something within the recently active mitral cells themselves changed to make these cells less excitable. This has not been seen before, and so represents a new way to store social memories. Nevertheless, these findings are still consistent with the idea that social memories are formed in areas of the brain that are among the first to process sensory information (Wilson et al., 1987).
Gao et al. reason that this new plasticity mechanism likely helps female rodents to recognize and remember their mating partners (Figure 1). After successfully mating with a male, the mitral cells in the accessory olfactory bulb that respond to the male's scent are all suppressed. This likely stops that male’s scent from triggering responses in other centers of the brain, while still allowing the female to identify, and respond to, a new male. For example, the neural plasticity described by Gao et al. may contribute to the 'Bruce effect' in which the presence of an unfamiliar male causes a female mouse to terminate her pregnancy, while the presence of the father does not (Bruce and Parrott, 1960).
This new kind of neural plasticity underscores the role of the accessory olfactory bulb in allowing animals to effectively recognize others and to form social memories. It also highlights the differences in how the social brain processes a familiar versus an unfamiliar animal. It is possible, however, that the excitability of mitral cells in the accessory olfactory bulb is also suppressed by other experiences, such as defending against a predator or caring for pups. Alternatively, animals may adapt to the sensory cues of a familiar mate while maintaining a strong response to dangerous predators. It will be interesting to learn from future experiments whether the plasticity described by Gao et al. is specific to mating or, rather, if it represents a more general mechanism for social learning in the accessory olfactory bulb.
Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanismsNeuropsychopharmacology 33:18–41.https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301559
Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: an updateProgress in Neurobiology 70:245–318.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(03)00103-5
The main and the accessory olfactory systems interact in the control of mate recognition and sexual behaviorBehavioural Brain Research 200:268–276.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.020
Noradrenergic induction of odor-specific neural habituation and olfactory memoriesJournal of Neuroscience 28:10711–10719.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3853-08.2008
Does play matter? Functional and evolutionary aspects of animal and human playBehavioral and Brain Sciences 5:139–155.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0001092X
Modified behavioral and olfactory bulb responses to maternal odors in preweanling ratsDevelopmental Brain Research 53:243–247.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(90)90013-O
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
We tested the proposal that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the AMPAR subunit GluA1 is required for LTP. We found that a knock-in mouse lacking the CTD of GluA1 expresses normal LTP and spatial memory, assayed by the Morris water maze. Our results support a model in which LTP generates synaptic slots, which capture passively diffusing AMPARs.
Perception depends on a complex interplay between feedforward and recurrent processing. Yet, while the former has been extensively characterized, the computational organization of the latter remains largely unknown. Here, we use magneto-encephalography to localize, track and decode the feedforward and recurrent processes of reading, as elicited by letters and digits whose level of ambiguity was parametrically manipulated. We first confirm that a feedforward response propagates through the ventral and dorsal pathways within the first 200 ms. The subsequent activity is distributed across temporal, parietal and prefrontal cortices, which sequentially generate five levels of representations culminating in action-specific motor signals. Our decoding analyses reveal that both the content and the timing of these brain responses are best explained by a hierarchy of recurrent neural assemblies, which both maintain and broadcast increasingly rich representations. Together, these results show how recurrent processes generate, over extended time periods, a cascade of decisions that ultimately accounts for subjects’ perceptual reports and reaction times.