Targeting RAS driven human cancer cells with antibodies to upregulated and essential cell-surface proteins

  1. Alexander John Martinko
  2. Charles Truillet
  3. Olivier Julien
  4. Juan Diaz
  5. Max A Horlbeck
  6. Gordon Whiteley
  7. Josip Blonder
  8. Jonathan S Weissman
  9. Sourav Bandyopadhyay
  10. Michael Evans
  11. James A Wells  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, United States

Abstract

While there have been tremendous efforts to target oncogenic RAS signaling from inside the cell, little effort has focused on the cell-surface. Here, we used quantitative surface proteomics to reveal a signature of proteins that are upregulated on cells transformed with KRASG12V, and driven by MAPK pathway signaling. We next generated a toolkit of recombinant antibodies to seven of these RAS induced proteins. We found that five of these proteins are broadly distributed on cancer cell lines harboring RAS mutations. In parallel, a cell-surface CRISPRi screen identified integrin and Wnt signaling proteins as critical to RAS transformed cells. We show that antibodies targeting CDCP1, a protein common to our proteomics and CRISPRi datasets, can be leveraged to deliver cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic payloads to RAS transformed cancer cells and report for RAS signaling status in vivo. Taken together, this work presents a technological platform for attacking RAS from outside the cell.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander John Martinko

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4025-959X
  2. Charles Truillet

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Olivier Julien

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7068-7299
  4. Juan Diaz

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Max A Horlbeck

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3875-871X
  6. Gordon Whiteley

    Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Josip Blonder

    Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jonathan S Weissman

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2445-670X
  9. Sourav Bandyopadhyay

    Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3120-923X
  10. Michael Evans

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. James A Wells

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    jim.wells@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    James A Wells, Celgene Corp provided some of the funding for this work.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8267-5519

Funding

National Institutes of Health (CA191018)

  • Alexander John Martinko
  • Olivier Julien
  • James A Wells

Celgene (GM097316)

  • Alexander John Martinko
  • James A Wells

National Institutes of Health (GM097316)

  • Alexander John Martinko
  • Olivier Julien
  • James A Wells

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeffrey Settleman, Calico Life Sciences, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (AN110806-03C) of the University of California San Francisco. Animals that were studied with PET/CT were anesthitized with a mixture of isoflurane/oxygen and humanely euthanized with CO2(g).

Version history

  1. Received: August 9, 2017
  2. Accepted: January 4, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 23, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 2, 2018 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: October 3, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2018, Martinko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,629
    views
  • 1,802
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander John Martinko
  2. Charles Truillet
  3. Olivier Julien
  4. Juan Diaz
  5. Max A Horlbeck
  6. Gordon Whiteley
  7. Josip Blonder
  8. Jonathan S Weissman
  9. Sourav Bandyopadhyay
  10. Michael Evans
  11. James A Wells
(2018)
Targeting RAS driven human cancer cells with antibodies to upregulated and essential cell-surface proteins
eLife 7:e31098.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31098

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31098

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.