Targeting RAS driven human cancer cells with antibodies to upregulated and essential cell-surface proteins

  1. Alexander John Martinko
  2. Charles Truillet
  3. Olivier Julien
  4. Juan Diaz
  5. Max A Horlbeck
  6. Gordon Whiteley
  7. Josip Blonder
  8. Jonathan S Weissman
  9. Sourav Bandyopadhyay
  10. Michael Evans
  11. James A Wells  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, United States

Abstract

While there have been tremendous efforts to target oncogenic RAS signaling from inside the cell, little effort has focused on the cell-surface. Here, we used quantitative surface proteomics to reveal a signature of proteins that are upregulated on cells transformed with KRASG12V, and driven by MAPK pathway signaling. We next generated a toolkit of recombinant antibodies to seven of these RAS induced proteins. We found that five of these proteins are broadly distributed on cancer cell lines harboring RAS mutations. In parallel, a cell-surface CRISPRi screen identified integrin and Wnt signaling proteins as critical to RAS transformed cells. We show that antibodies targeting CDCP1, a protein common to our proteomics and CRISPRi datasets, can be leveraged to deliver cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic payloads to RAS transformed cancer cells and report for RAS signaling status in vivo. Taken together, this work presents a technological platform for attacking RAS from outside the cell.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander John Martinko

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4025-959X
  2. Charles Truillet

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Olivier Julien

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7068-7299
  4. Juan Diaz

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Max A Horlbeck

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3875-871X
  6. Gordon Whiteley

    Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Josip Blonder

    Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jonathan S Weissman

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2445-670X
  9. Sourav Bandyopadhyay

    Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3120-923X
  10. Michael Evans

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. James A Wells

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    jim.wells@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    James A Wells, Celgene Corp provided some of the funding for this work.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8267-5519

Funding

National Institutes of Health (CA191018)

  • Alexander John Martinko
  • Olivier Julien
  • James A Wells

Celgene (GM097316)

  • Alexander John Martinko
  • James A Wells

National Institutes of Health (GM097316)

  • Alexander John Martinko
  • Olivier Julien
  • James A Wells

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (AN110806-03C) of the University of California San Francisco. Animals that were studied with PET/CT were anesthitized with a mixture of isoflurane/oxygen and humanely euthanized with CO2(g).

Copyright

© 2018, Martinko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,045
    views
  • 1,849
    downloads
  • 77
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander John Martinko
  2. Charles Truillet
  3. Olivier Julien
  4. Juan Diaz
  5. Max A Horlbeck
  6. Gordon Whiteley
  7. Josip Blonder
  8. Jonathan S Weissman
  9. Sourav Bandyopadhyay
  10. Michael Evans
  11. James A Wells
(2018)
Targeting RAS driven human cancer cells with antibodies to upregulated and essential cell-surface proteins
eLife 7:e31098.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31098

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31098

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Santi Mestre-Fos, Lucas Ferguson ... Jamie HD Cate
    Research Article

    Stem cell differentiation involves a global increase in protein synthesis to meet the demands of specialized cell types. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this translational burst and the involvement of initiation factors remains largely unknown. Here, we investigate the role of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) in early differentiation of human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Using Quick-irCLIP and alternative polyadenylation (APA) Seq, we show eIF3 crosslinks predominantly with 3’ untranslated region (3’-UTR) termini of multiple mRNA isoforms, adjacent to the poly(A) tail. Furthermore, we find that eIF3 engagement at 3’-UTR ends is dependent on polyadenylation. High eIF3 crosslinking at 3’-UTR termini of mRNAs correlates with high translational activity, as determined by ribosome profiling, but not with translational efficiency. The results presented here show that eIF3 engages with 3’-UTR termini of highly translated mRNAs, likely reflecting a general rather than specific regulatory function of eIF3, and supporting a role of mRNA circularization in the mechanisms governing mRNA translation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Ana Patrícia Graça, Vadim Nikitushkin ... Gerald Lackner
    Research Article

    Mycofactocin is a redox cofactor essential for the alcohol metabolism of mycobacteria. While the biosynthesis of mycofactocin is well established, the gene mftG, which encodes an oxidoreductase of the glucose-methanol-choline superfamily, remained functionally uncharacterized. Here, we show that MftG enzymes are almost exclusively found in genomes containing mycofactocin biosynthetic genes and are present in 75% of organisms harboring these genes. Gene deletion experiments in Mycolicibacterium smegmatis demonstrated a growth defect of the ∆mftG mutant on ethanol as a carbon source, accompanied by an arrest of cell division reminiscent of mild starvation. Investigation of carbon and cofactor metabolism implied a defect in mycofactocin reoxidation. Cell-free enzyme assays and respirometry using isolated cell membranes indicated that MftG acts as a mycofactocin dehydrogenase shuttling electrons toward the respiratory chain. Transcriptomics studies also indicated remodeling of redox metabolism to compensate for a shortage of redox equivalents. In conclusion, this work closes an important knowledge gap concerning the mycofactocin system and adds a new pathway to the intricate web of redox reactions governing the metabolism of mycobacteria.