1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
Download icon

Origin of life: Transitioning to DNA genomes in an RNA world

  1. Razvan Cojocaru
  2. Peter J Unrau  Is a corresponding author
  1. Simon Fraser University, Canada
Insight
  • Cited 3
  • Views 10,268
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e32330 doi: 10.7554/eLife.32330

Abstract

The unexpected ability of an RNA polymerase ribozyme to copy RNA into DNA has ramifications for understanding how DNA genomes evolved.

Main text

For as long as history has been recorded, humanity has tried to answer the ancient question of our origins. The ‘central dogma’ of molecular biology, first stated by Francis Crick in 1958, represented a major step forward in our efforts to answer this question (Figure 1A; Crick, 1958). In this model, the genetic information stored in DNA is transcribed to produce RNA, which is then translated by the ribosome to produce chains of amino acids. These chains fold to make the proteins that are responsible for almost everything that happens in cells.

The emergence of DNA genomes in the RNA world.

(A) In the central dogma of molecular biology, information flows from DNA (red oval) to RNA (green oval) to protein (blue box). DNA is formed of building blocks called deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and can be replicated (solid looping red arrow); RNA is formed of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). Enzymes called reverse transcriptases (RT) enable complementary DNA to be made from the building blocks of RNA (dashed arrow). Blue rectangles represent processes catalyzed by proteins; green rectangles show processes catalyzed by RNA; translation is mediated by an RNA catalyst (green inner rectangle) that has proteins that modulate its activity (blue outline). (B) In the RNA world, ribozymes (RdRp) replicate RNA genomes (solid looping red arrow). Based on the work of Joyce and Samanta, if dNTPs were present in the RNA world, reverse transcriptase ribozymes could have constructed DNA genomes using RNA genomes as a template (straight red arrow). Ribozymes could also have potentially replicated DNA genomes (dashed red arrow).

The flow of information from DNA to RNA to protein is thought to have evolved out of a simpler evolutionary period when genetic information was stored and transmitted solely by RNA molecules. This theory, known as the ‘RNA world hypothesis’, posits that an RNA enzyme or ‘ribozyme’ capable of copying RNA molecules existed early in evolution, and that protein synthesis by the ribosome (which is also an RNA enzyme) evolved out of this system (Figure 1B; Gilbert, 1986; Atkins et al., 2011). The theory, however, is largely silent on how DNA genomes evolved.

In modern metabolism, protein-based enzymes called reverse transcriptases can copy RNA to produce molecules of complementary DNA. Other enzymes can promote the production of DNA nucleotides (the building blocks of DNA molecules) from RNA nucleotides via challenging chemical reactions. So how did the first DNA genomes come to be? There are two possibilities within the framework of the RNA world. In the first, protein enzymes evolved before DNA genomes. In the second, the RNA world contained RNA polymerase ribozymes that were able to produce single-stranded complementary DNA and then convert it into stable double-stranded DNA genomes.

A number of laboratories around the world are trying to build ribozymes that can sustain RNA replication (Wang et al., 2011; Attwater et al., 2013). Recently, David Horning and Gerald Joyce artificially evolved a ribozyme that is capable of copying complex RNAs and amplifying short RNA templates (Horning and Joyce, 2016). Now, in eLife, Joyce and Biswajit Samanta at the Salk Institute demonstrate that this ribozyme is also a reverse transcriptase (Samanta and Joyce, 2017). Feeding DNA nucleotides to this ribozyme enabled it to copy short segments of RNA templates into complementary DNA. This suggests that if an RNA world contained DNA nucleotides, DNA genomes could have been assembled and then presumably replicated by ribozymes.

Whether DNA genomes existed very early in evolution fundamentally rests on whether DNA nucleotides were available in the RNA world. There are plausible routes by which RNA and DNA nucleotides could have been synthesized before life emerged, meaning that they are likely to have been available at the dawn of an RNA world (Ritson and Sutherland, 2014Becker et al., 2016; Kim and Benner, 2017). Likewise, artificially selected ribozymes have been used to synthesize the two types of bases found in RNA nucleotides from simpler precursors, suggesting RNA nucleotides could have been built by early RNA systems (Martin et al., 2015). If DNA precursors were also available early in evolution, then the synthesis of DNA nucleotides by an RNA system appears likely. While this area is currently underexplored experimentally, there appears to be no fundamental reason why DNA nucleotides could not have been abundant quite early in evolution.

Demonstrating that DNA polymerase ribozymes are able to rapidly use such DNA nucleotides would represent a major step forward for the early DNA genome model. While the field of artificial RNA polymerase ribozymes has made rapid strides, their ability to add multiple nucleotides rapidly is still very limited. Current ribozymes are significantly longer and more complex than the sequences that they are able to copy, but to make self-evolving systems, ribozymes need to be able to copy sequences that are longer and more complex than themselves. It will therefore be exciting to see if the techniques that have created such RNA polymerases are also able to evolve DNA polymerase ribozymes that have the potential to make self-replicating systems using DNA and not RNA as a source of genetic material. Such a system would bring us closer to understanding the transition from an RNA world to a type of life that respects the rules of the central dogma of modern biology.

References

  1. Book
    1. Atkins JF
    2. Gesteland RF
    3. Cech TR
    (2011)
    RNA Worlds
    Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
    1. Crick FH
    (1958)
    On protein synthesis
    Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 12:138–163.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Razvan Cojocaru

    Razvan Cojocaru is in the Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  2. Peter J Unrau

    Peter J Unrau is in the Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

    For correspondence
    punrau@sfu.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1392-6948

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: November 1, 2017 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2017, Cojocaru et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,268
    Page views
  • 551
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Sydney P Thomas, John M Denu
    Research Article

    Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) acetate, propionate, and butyrate are produced in large quantities by the gut microbiome and contribute to a wide array of physiological processes. While the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown, many effects of SCFAs have been traced to changes in the cell’s epigenetic state. Here, we systematically investigate how SCFAs alter the epigenome. Using quantitative proteomics of histone modification states, we identified rapid and sustained increases in histone acetylation after addition of butyrate or propionate, but not acetate. While decades of prior observations would have suggested that hyperacetylation induced by SCFAs are attributed to inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs), we found that propionate and butyrate instead activate the acetyltransferase p300. Propionate and butyrate are rapidly converted to the corresponding acyl-CoAs which are then used by p300 to catalyze auto-acylation of the autoinhibitory loop, activating the enzyme for histone/protein acetylation. This data challenges the long-held belief that SCFAs mainly regulate chromatin by inhibiting HDACs, and instead reveals a previously unknown mechanism of HAT activation that can explain how an influx of low levels of SCFAs alters global chromatin states.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Krishna S Ghanta et al.
    Research Article

    Nuclease-directed genome editing is a powerful tool for investigating physiology and has great promise as a therapeutic approach to correct mutations that cause disease. In its most precise form, genome editing can use cellular homology-directed repair (HDR) pathways to insert information from an exogenously supplied DNA repair template (donor) directly into a targeted genomic location. Unfortunately, particularly for long insertions, toxicity and delivery considerations associated with repair template DNA can limit HDR efficacy. Here, we explore chemical modifications to both double-stranded and single-stranded DNA-repair templates. We describe 5′-terminal modifications, including in its simplest form the incorporation of triethylene glycol (TEG) moieties, that consistently increase the frequency of precision editing in the germlines of three animal models (Caenorhabditis elegans, zebrafish, mice) and in cultured human cells.