Clathrin coat controls synaptic vesicle acidification by blocking vacuolar ATPase activity

  1. Zohreh Farsi
  2. Sindhuja Gowrisankaran
  3. Matija Krunic
  4. Burkhard Rammner
  5. Andrew Woehler
  6. Eileen M Lafer
  7. Carsten Mim
  8. Reinhard Jahn
  9. Ira Milosevic  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  2. European Neuroscience Institute (ENI), Germany
  3. Sciloop, Germany
  4. Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Germany
  5. University of Texas Health Science Center, United States
  6. Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Sweden

Abstract

Newly-formed synaptic vesicles (SVs) are rapidly acidified by vacuolar adenosine triphosphatases (vATPases), generating a proton electrochemical gradient that drives neurotransmitter loading. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is needed for the formation of new SVs, yet it is unclear when endocytosed vesicles acidify and refill at the synapse. Here, we isolated clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) from mouse brain to measure their acidification directly at the single vesicle level. We observed that the ATP-induced acidification of CCVs was strikingly reduced in comparison to SVs. Remarkably, when the coat was removed from CCVs, uncoated vesicles regained ATP-dependent acidification, demonstrating that CCVs contain the functional vATPase, yet its function is inhibited by the clathrin coat. Considering the known structures of the vATPase and clathrin coat, we propose a model in which the formation of the coat surrounds the vATPase and blocks its activity. Such inhibition is likely fundamental for the proper timing of SV refilling.

Data availability

The structure has been deposited with the EMDB-ID #4335.For additional information considering structure please contact Prof Dr Carsten Mim at carsten.mim@ki.se

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zohreh Farsi

    Department of Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Sindhuja Gowrisankaran

    Synaptic Vesicle Dynamics Group, European Neuroscience Institute (ENI), Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Matija Krunic

    Synaptic Vesicle Dynamics Group, European Neuroscience Institute (ENI), Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Burkhard Rammner

    Sciloop, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andrew Woehler

    Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Eileen M Lafer

    Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Carsten Mim

    Department for Biomedical Engineering and Health Solutions, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Huddinge, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Reinhard Jahn

    Department of Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    Reinhard Jahn, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1542-3498
  9. Ira Milosevic

    Synaptic Vesicle Dynamics Group, European Neuroscience Institute (ENI), Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    imilose@gwdg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6440-3763

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether Young Investigator Award MI-1702/1)

  • Ira Milosevic

Human Frontier Science Program (Young Investigator Grant RGY0074/16)

  • Carsten Mim

Schram Stiftung (T287/25457)

  • Ira Milosevic

Engelhorn Stiftung (Postdoc fellowship)

  • Zohreh Farsi

Synaptic System PhD fellowship (PhD fellowship)

  • Sindhuja Gowrisankaran

National Institutes of Health (GM118933)

  • Eileen M Lafer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Margaret S. Robinson, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted according to the European Guidelines for animal welfare (2010/63/EU) with approval by the Lower Saxony Landesamt fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES), registration number 14/1701.

Version history

  1. Received: October 6, 2017
  2. Accepted: April 7, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 13, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 4, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Farsi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,372
    views
  • 758
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zohreh Farsi
  2. Sindhuja Gowrisankaran
  3. Matija Krunic
  4. Burkhard Rammner
  5. Andrew Woehler
  6. Eileen M Lafer
  7. Carsten Mim
  8. Reinhard Jahn
  9. Ira Milosevic
(2018)
Clathrin coat controls synaptic vesicle acidification by blocking vacuolar ATPase activity
eLife 7:e32569.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32569

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32569

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    James Malkin, Cian O'Donnell ... Laurence Aitchison
    Research Article

    Biological synaptic transmission is unreliable, and this unreliability likely degrades neural circuit performance. While there are biophysical mechanisms that can increase reliability, for instance by increasing vesicle release probability, these mechanisms cost energy. We examined four such mechanisms along with the associated scaling of the energetic costs. We then embedded these energetic costs for reliability in artificial neural networks (ANNs) with trainable stochastic synapses, and trained these networks on standard image classification tasks. The resulting networks revealed a tradeoff between circuit performance and the energetic cost of synaptic reliability. Additionally, the optimised networks exhibited two testable predictions consistent with pre-existing experimental data. Specifically, synapses with lower variability tended to have (1) higher input firing rates and (2) lower learning rates. Surprisingly, these predictions also arise when synapse statistics are inferred through Bayesian inference. Indeed, we were able to find a formal, theoretical link between the performance-reliability cost tradeoff and Bayesian inference. This connection suggests two incompatible possibilities: evolution may have chanced upon a scheme for implementing Bayesian inference by optimising energy efficiency, or alternatively, energy-efficient synapses may display signatures of Bayesian inference without actually using Bayes to reason about uncertainty.

    1. Neuroscience
    Wenyu Tu, Samuel R Cramer, Nanyin Zhang
    Research Article

    Resting-state brain networks (RSNs) have been widely applied in health and disease, but the interpretation of RSNs in terms of the underlying neural activity is unclear. To address this fundamental question, we conducted simultaneous recordings of whole-brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and electrophysiology signals in two separate brain regions of rats. Our data reveal that for both recording sites, spatial maps derived from band-specific local field potential (LFP) power can account for up to 90% of the spatial variability in RSNs derived from rsfMRI signals. Surprisingly, the time series of LFP band power can only explain to a maximum of 35% of the temporal variance of the local rsfMRI time course from the same site. In addition, regressing out time series of LFP power from rsfMRI signals has minimal impact on the spatial patterns of rsfMRI-based RSNs. This disparity in the spatial and temporal relationships between resting-state electrophysiology and rsfMRI signals suggests that electrophysiological activity alone does not fully explain the effects observed in the rsfMRI signal, implying the existence of an rsfMRI component contributed by ‘electrophysiology-invisible’ signals. These findings offer a novel perspective on our understanding of RSN interpretation.