Age-related islet inflammation marks the proliferative decline of pancreatic beta-cells in zebrafish

  1. Sharan Janjuha
  2. Sumeet Pal Singh
  3. Anastasia Tsakmaki
  4. Neda Mousavy-Gharavy
  5. Priyanka Murawala
  6. Judith Konantz
  7. Sarah Birke
  8. David J Hodson
  9. Guy Rutter
  10. Gavin Bewick
  11. Nikolay N Ninov  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  2. King's College London, United Kingdom
  3. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  4. University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

The pancreatic islet, a cellular community harboring the insulin-producing beta-cells, is known to undergo age-related alterations. However, only a handful of signals associated with aging have been identified. By comparing beta-cells from younger and older zebrafish, here we show that the aging islets exhibit signs of chronic inflammation. These include recruitment of tnfα-expressing macrophages and the activation of NF-kB signaling in beta-cells. Using a transgenic reporter, we show that NF-kB activity is undetectable in juvenile beta-cells, whereas cells from older fish exhibit heterogeneous NF-kB activity. We link this heterogeneity to differences in gene expression and proliferation. Beta-cells with high NF-kB signaling proliferate significantly less compared to their neighbors with low activity. The NF-kB signalinghi cells also exhibit premature upregulation of socs2, an age-related gene that inhibits beta-cell proliferation. Together, our results show that NF-kB activity marks the asynchronous decline in beta-cell proliferation with advancing age.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sharan Janjuha

    DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sumeet Pal Singh

    DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5154-3318
  3. Anastasia Tsakmaki

    School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Neda Mousavy-Gharavy

    Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Priyanka Murawala

    DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Judith Konantz

    DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sarah Birke

    DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. David J Hodson

    Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8641-8568
  9. Guy Rutter

    Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gavin Bewick

    School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4335-8403
  11. Nikolay N Ninov

    DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    nikolay.ninov@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3286-6100

Funding

DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden

  • Nikolay N Ninov

German Center for Diabetes Research

  • Nikolay N Ninov

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Nikolay N Ninov

European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes

  • Nikolay N Ninov

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marianne Bronner, California Institute of Technology, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were conducted in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act and with permissionof the Landesdirektion Sachsen, Germany (AZ 24-9168, TV38/2015, A12/2016, A5/2017).

Version history

  1. Received: October 23, 2017
  2. Accepted: April 5, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 6, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 10, 2018 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: May 9, 2018 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2018, Janjuha et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,897
    views
  • 637
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sharan Janjuha
  2. Sumeet Pal Singh
  3. Anastasia Tsakmaki
  4. Neda Mousavy-Gharavy
  5. Priyanka Murawala
  6. Judith Konantz
  7. Sarah Birke
  8. David J Hodson
  9. Guy Rutter
  10. Gavin Bewick
  11. Nikolay N Ninov
(2018)
Age-related islet inflammation marks the proliferative decline of pancreatic beta-cells in zebrafish
eLife 7:e32965.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32965

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32965

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Joanne Tung, Lei Huang ... Adriana Ordonez
    Research Article

    Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) is one of three endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane stress sensors that mediate the unfolded protein response (UPR). Despite its crucial role in long-term ER stress adaptation, regulation of ATF6 alpha (α) signalling remains poorly understood, possibly because its activation involves ER-to-Golgi and nuclear trafficking. Here, we generated an ATF6α/Inositol-requiring kinase 1 (IRE1) dual UPR reporter CHO-K1 cell line and performed an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen to systematically profile genetic factors that specifically contribute to ATF6α signalling in the presence and absence of ER stress. The screen identified both anticipated and new candidate genes that regulate ATF6α activation. Among these, calreticulin (CRT), a key ER luminal chaperone, selectively repressed ATF6α signalling: Cells lacking CRT constitutively activated a BiP::sfGFP ATF6α-dependent reporter, had higher BiP levels and an increased rate of trafficking and processing of ATF6α. Purified CRT interacted with the luminal domain of ATF6α in vitro and the two proteins co-immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. CRT depletion exposed a negative feedback loop implicating ATF6α in repressing IRE1 activity basally and overexpression of CRT reversed this repression. Our findings indicate that CRT, beyond its known role as a chaperone, also serves as an ER repressor of ATF6α to selectively regulate one arm of the UPR.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Alex Weiss, Cassandra D'Amata ... Madeline N Hayes
    Research Article

    High-throughput vertebrate animal model systems for the study of patient-specific biology and new therapeutic approaches for aggressive brain tumors are currently lacking, and new approaches are urgently needed. Therefore, to build a patient-relevant in vivo model of human glioblastoma, we expressed common oncogenic variants including activated human EGFRvIII and PI3KCAH1047R under the control of the radial glial-specific promoter her4.1 in syngeneic tp53 loss-of-function mutant zebrafish. Robust tumor formation was observed prior to 45 days of life, and tumors had a gene expression signature similar to human glioblastoma of the mesenchymal subtype, with a strong inflammatory component. Within early stage tumor lesions, and in an in vivo and endogenous tumor microenvironment, we visualized infiltration of phagocytic cells, as well as internalization of tumor cells by mpeg1.1:EGFP+ microglia/macrophages, suggesting negative regulatory pressure by pro-inflammatory cell types on tumor growth at early stages of glioblastoma initiation. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting of master inflammatory transcription factors irf7 or irf8 led to increased tumor formation in the primary context, while suppression of phagocyte activity led to enhanced tumor cell engraftment following transplantation into otherwise immune-competent zebrafish hosts. Altogether, we developed a genetically relevant model of aggressive human glioblastoma and harnessed the unique advantages of zebrafish including live imaging, high-throughput genetic and chemical manipulations to highlight important tumor-suppressive roles for the innate immune system on glioblastoma initiation, with important future opportunities for therapeutic discovery and optimizations.