Hyperactivation of ERK by multiple mechanisms is toxic to RTK-RAS mutation-driven lung adenocarcinoma cells

  1. Arun M Unni  Is a corresponding author
  2. Bryant Harbourne
  3. Min Hee Oh
  4. Sophia Wild
  5. John R Ferrarone
  6. William W Lockwood  Is a corresponding author
  7. Harold Varmus  Is a corresponding author
  1. Weill Cornell Medicine, United States
  2. British Columbia Cancer Agency, Canada

Abstract

Synthetic lethality results when mutant KRAS and EGFR proteins are co-expressed in human lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells, revealing the biological basis for mutual exclusivity of KRAS and EGFR mutations. We have now defined the biochemical events responsible for the toxic effects by combining pharmacological and genetic approaches and to show that signaling through extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) mediates the toxicity. These findings imply that tumors with mutant oncogenes in the RAS pathway must restrain the activity of ERK1/2 to avoid toxicities and enable tumor growth. A dual specificity phosphatase, DUSP6, that negatively regulates phosphorylation of (P)-ERK is up-regulated in EGFR- or KRAS-mutant LUAD, potentially protecting cells with mutations in the RAS signaling pathway, a proposal supported by experiments with DUSP6-specific siRNA and an inhibitory drug. Targeting DUSP6 or other negative regulators might offer a treatment strategy for certain cancers by inducing the toxic effects of RAS-mediated signaling.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2 and Figure 2-supplemental figure 1 in the Methods section and/or in the text.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arun M Unni

    Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    aru2001@med.cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0530-1470
  2. Bryant Harbourne

    Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Min Hee Oh

    Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sophia Wild

    Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John R Ferrarone

    Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. William W Lockwood

    Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
    For correspondence
    wlockwood@bccrc.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Harold Varmus

    Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    varmus@med.cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Cancer Research Society

  • William W Lockwood

National Institutes of Health

  • Harold Varmus

Meyer Cancer Center

  • Harold Varmus

Terry Fox Research Institute

  • William W Lockwood

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Unni et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,186
    views
  • 1,168
    downloads
  • 77
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arun M Unni
  2. Bryant Harbourne
  3. Min Hee Oh
  4. Sophia Wild
  5. John R Ferrarone
  6. William W Lockwood
  7. Harold Varmus
(2018)
Hyperactivation of ERK by multiple mechanisms is toxic to RTK-RAS mutation-driven lung adenocarcinoma cells
eLife 7:e33718.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33718

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33718

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Arman Angaji, Michel Owusu ... Johannes Berg
    Research Article

    In growing cell populations such as tumours, mutations can serve as markers that allow tracking the past evolution from current samples. The genomic analyses of bulk samples and samples from multiple regions have shed light on the evolutionary forces acting on tumours. However, little is known empirically on the spatio-temporal dynamics of tumour evolution. Here, we leverage published data from resected hepatocellular carcinomas, each with several hundred samples taken in two and three dimensions. Using spatial metrics of evolution, we find that tumour cells grow predominantly uniformly within the tumour volume instead of at the surface. We determine how mutations and cells are dispersed throughout the tumour and how cell death contributes to the overall tumour growth. Our methods shed light on the early evolution of tumours in vivo and can be applied to high-resolution data in the emerging field of spatial biology.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Susanne Tilk, Judith Frydman ... Dmitri A Petrov
    Research Article

    In asexual populations that don’t undergo recombination, such as cancer, deleterious mutations are expected to accrue readily due to genome-wide linkage between mutations. Despite this mutational load of often thousands of deleterious mutations, many tumors thrive. How tumors survive the damaging consequences of this mutational load is not well understood. Here, we investigate the functional consequences of mutational load in 10,295 human tumors by quantifying their phenotypic response through changes in gene expression. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we find that high mutational load tumors up-regulate proteostasis machinery related to the mitigation and prevention of protein misfolding. We replicate these expression responses in cancer cell lines and show that the viability in high mutational load cancer cells is strongly dependent on complexes that degrade and refold proteins. This indicates that the upregulation of proteostasis machinery is causally important for high mutational burden tumors and uncovers new therapeutic vulnerabilities.