Modulation of Prdm9-controlled meiotic chromosome asynapsis overrides hybrid sterility in mice

  1. Sona Gregorova
  2. Vaclav Gergelits  Is a corresponding author
  3. Irena Chvatalova
  4. Tanmoy Bhattacharyya
  5. Barbora Valiskova
  6. Vladana Fotopulosova
  7. Petr Jansa
  8. Diana Wiatrowska
  9. Jiri Forejt  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic

Abstract

Hybrid sterility is one of the reproductive isolation mechanisms leading to speciation. Prdm9, the only known vertebrate hybrid sterility gene, causes failure of meiotic chromosome synapsis and infertility in male hybrids between two mouse subspecies. But within species Prdm9 determines the sites of programmed DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic recombination hotspots. To investigate the relation between Prdm9-controlled meiotic arrest and asynapsis, we inserted random stretches of consubspecific homology on several autosomal pairs in sterile hybrids and analyzed their ability to form synaptonemal complexes and rescue male fertility. Twenty-seven or more Mb of consubspecific (belonging to the same subspecies) homology fully restored synapsis in a given autosomal pair and we predicted that two or more DSBs within symmetric hotspots per chromosome are necessary for successful meiosis. We hypothesize that impaired recombination between evolutionarily diverged chromosomes could function as one of the mechanisms of hybrid sterility occurring in various sexually reproducing species.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sona Gregorova

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vaclav Gergelits

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    vaclav.gergelits@img.cas.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5178-8833
  3. Irena Chvatalova

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tanmoy Bhattacharyya

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Barbora Valiskova

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Vladana Fotopulosova

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Petr Jansa

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Diana Wiatrowska

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jiri Forejt

    Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    jforejt@img.cas.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2793-3623

Funding

Czech Science Fundation (13-08078S)

  • Jiri Forejt

Charles University Grant Agency of The Czech Republic (435416)

  • Vaclav Gergelits
  • Barbora Valiskova

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of The Czech Republic (LQ1604 project of the NSPII)

  • Jiri Forejt

Charles University Grant Agency of The Czech Republic (17115)

  • Vaclav Gergelits
  • Barbora Valiskova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The mice were maintained at the Institute of Molecular Genetics in Prague and Vestec, Czech Republic. The project was approved by the Animal Care and use Committee of the Institute of Molecular Genetics AS CR, protocol No 141/2012. The principles of laboratory animal care Czech Act No. 246/1992 Sb., compatible with EU Council Directive 86/609/EEC and Apendix of the Council of Europe Convention ETS, were observed.

Copyright

© 2018, Gregorova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,360
    views
  • 380
    downloads
  • 56
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sona Gregorova
  2. Vaclav Gergelits
  3. Irena Chvatalova
  4. Tanmoy Bhattacharyya
  5. Barbora Valiskova
  6. Vladana Fotopulosova
  7. Petr Jansa
  8. Diana Wiatrowska
  9. Jiri Forejt
(2018)
Modulation of Prdm9-controlled meiotic chromosome asynapsis overrides hybrid sterility in mice
eLife 7:e34282.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34282

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34282

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Matthew C Pahl, Prabhat Sharma ... Andrew D Wells
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of genetic signals associated with autoimmune disease. The majority of these signals are located in non-coding regions and likely impact cis-regulatory elements (cRE). Because cRE function is dynamic across cell types and states, profiling the epigenetic status of cRE across physiological processes is necessary to characterize the molecular mechanisms by which autoimmune variants contribute to disease risk. We localized risk variants from 15 autoimmune GWAS to cRE active during TCR-CD28 co-stimulation of naïve human CD4+ T cells. To characterize how dynamic changes in gene expression correlate with cRE activity, we measured transcript levels, chromatin accessibility, and promoter–cRE contacts across three phases of naive CD4+ T cell activation using RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and HiC. We identified ~1200 protein-coding genes physically connected to accessible disease-associated variants at 423 GWAS signals, at least one-third of which are dynamically regulated by activation. From these maps, we functionally validated a novel stretch of evolutionarily conserved intergenic enhancers whose activity is required for activation-induced IL2 gene expression in human and mouse, and is influenced by autoimmune-associated genetic variation. The set of genes implicated by this approach are enriched for genes controlling CD4+ T cell function and genes involved in human inborn errors of immunity, and we pharmacologically validated eight implicated genes as novel regulators of T cell activation. These studies directly show how autoimmune variants and the genes they regulate influence processes involved in CD4+ T cell proliferation and activation.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    Leif Benner, Savannah Muron ... Brian Oliver
    Research Article

    Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.