ZMYND10 functions in a chaperone relay during axonemal dynein assembly

  1. Girish R Mali
  2. Patricia L Yeyati
  3. Seiya Mizuno
  4. Daniel O Dodd
  5. Peter A Tennant
  6. Margaret A Keighren
  7. Petra zur Lage
  8. Amelia Shoemark
  9. Amaya Garcia-Munoz
  10. Atsuko Shimada
  11. Hiroyuki Takeda
  12. Frank Edlich
  13. Satoru Takahashi
  14. Alex von Kreisheim
  15. Andrew Paul Jarman
  16. Pleasantine Mill  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. University of Tsukuba, Japan
  3. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  4. University College Dublin, Ireland
  5. University of Tokyo, Japan
  6. University of Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

Molecular chaperones promote the folding and macromolecular assembly of a diverse set of 'client' proteins. How ubiquitous chaperone machineries direct their activities towards specific sets of substrates is unclear. Through the use of mouse genetics, imaging and quantitative proteomics we uncover that ZMYND10 is a novel co-chaperone that confers specificity for the FKBP8-HSP90 chaperone complex towards axonemal dynein clients required for cilia motility. Loss of ZMYND10 perturbs the chaperoning of axonemal dynein heavy chains, triggering broader degradation of dynein motor subunits. We show that pharmacological inhibition of FKBP8 phenocopies dynein motor instability associated with the loss of ZMYND10 in airway cells and that human disease-causing variants of ZMYND10 disrupt its ability to act as an FKBP8-HSP90 co-chaperone. Our study indicates that Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), caused by mutations in dynein assembly factors disrupting cytoplasmic pre-assembly of axonemal dynein motors, should be considered a cell-type specific protein-misfolding disease.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited and is available on the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD006849.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Girish R Mali

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Patricia L Yeyati

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Seiya Mizuno

    Laboratory Animal Resource Centre, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Daniel O Dodd

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peter A Tennant

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Margaret A Keighren

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Petra zur Lage

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Amelia Shoemark

    Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Amaya Garcia-Munoz

    System Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Atsuko Shimada

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hiroyuki Takeda

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Frank Edlich

    Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Satoru Takahashi

    Laboratory Animal Resource Centre, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Alex von Kreisheim

    Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Andrew Paul Jarman

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4036-5701
  16. Pleasantine Mill

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Pleasantine.Mill@igmm.ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5218-134X

Funding

Medical Research Council (MRC_UU_12018/26)

  • Girish R Mali
  • Patricia L Yeyati
  • Daniel O Dodd
  • Peter A Tennant
  • Margaret A Keighren
  • Pleasantine Mill

Science Foundation Ireland

  • Amaya Garcia-Munoz
  • Alex von Kreisheim

Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland

  • Girish R Mali
  • Andrew Paul Jarman
  • Pleasantine Mill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work was approved by a University of Edinburgh internal ethics committee and was performed in accordance with institutional guidelines under license by the UK Home Office (PPL 60/4424). Mice were maintained in an SPF environment in facilities of the University of Edinburgh (PEL 60/2605).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy F Reiter, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: December 15, 2017
  2. Accepted: June 18, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 19, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 13, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Mali et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,739
    Page views
  • 387
    Downloads
  • 30
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Girish R Mali
  2. Patricia L Yeyati
  3. Seiya Mizuno
  4. Daniel O Dodd
  5. Peter A Tennant
  6. Margaret A Keighren
  7. Petra zur Lage
  8. Amelia Shoemark
  9. Amaya Garcia-Munoz
  10. Atsuko Shimada
  11. Hiroyuki Takeda
  12. Frank Edlich
  13. Satoru Takahashi
  14. Alex von Kreisheim
  15. Andrew Paul Jarman
  16. Pleasantine Mill
(2018)
ZMYND10 functions in a chaperone relay during axonemal dynein assembly
eLife 7:e34389.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34389

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Cancer Biology
    Chelsea U Kidwell, Joseph R Casalini ... Minna Roh-Johnson
    Research Article Updated

    Recent studies reveal that lateral mitochondrial transfer, the movement of mitochondria from one cell to another, can affect cellular and tissue homeostasis. Most of what we know about mitochondrial transfer stems from bulk cell studies and have led to the paradigm that functional transferred mitochondria restore bioenergetics and revitalize cellular functions to recipient cells with damaged or non-functional mitochondrial networks. However, we show that mitochondrial transfer also occurs between cells with functioning endogenous mitochondrial networks, but the mechanisms underlying how transferred mitochondria can promote such sustained behavioral reprogramming remain unclear. We report that unexpectedly, transferred macrophage mitochondria are dysfunctional and accumulate reactive oxygen species in recipient cancer cells. We further discovered that reactive oxygen species accumulation activates ERK signaling, promoting cancer cell proliferation. Pro-tumorigenic macrophages exhibit fragmented mitochondrial networks, leading to higher rates of mitochondrial transfer to cancer cells. Finally, we observe that macrophage mitochondrial transfer promotes tumor cell proliferation in vivo. Collectively these results indicate that transferred macrophage mitochondria activate downstream signaling pathways in a ROS-dependent manner in cancer cells, and provide a model of how sustained behavioral reprogramming can be mediated by a relatively small amount of transferred mitochondria in vitro and in vivo.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Yalda Afshar, Feyiang Ma ... Luisa Iruela-Arispe
    Research Article

    Environmental cues, such as physical forces and heterotypic cell interactions play a critical role in cell function, yet their collective contributions to transcriptional changes are unclear. Focusing on human endothelial cells, we performed broad individual sample analysis to identify transcriptional drifts associated with environmental changes that were independent of genetic background. Global gene expression profiling by RNAseq and protein expression by LC-MS directed proteomics distinguished endothelial cells in vivo from genetically matched culture (in vitro) samples. Over 43% of the transcriptome was significantly changed by the in vitro environment. Subjecting cultured cells to long-term shear stress significantly rescued the expression of approximately 17% of genes. Inclusion of heterotypic interactions by co-culture of endothelial cells with smooth muscle cells normalized approximately 9% of the original in vivo signature. We also identified novel flow dependent genes, as well as genes that necessitate heterotypic cell interactions to mimic the in vivo transcriptome. Our findings highlight specific genes and pathways that rely on contextual information for adequate expression from those that are agnostic of such environmental cues.