ZMYND10 functions in a chaperone relay during axonemal dynein assembly

  1. Girish R Mali
  2. Patricia L Yeyati
  3. Seiya Mizuno
  4. Daniel O Dodd
  5. Peter A Tennant
  6. Margaret A Keighren
  7. Petra zur Lage
  8. Amelia Shoemark
  9. Amaya Garcia-Munoz
  10. Atsuko Shimada
  11. Hiroyuki Takeda
  12. Frank Edlich
  13. Satoru Takahashi
  14. Alex von Kreisheim
  15. Andrew Paul Jarman
  16. Pleasantine Mill  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. University of Tsukuba, Japan
  3. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  4. University College Dublin, Ireland
  5. University of Tokyo, Japan
  6. University of Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

Molecular chaperones promote the folding and macromolecular assembly of a diverse set of 'client' proteins. How ubiquitous chaperone machineries direct their activities towards specific sets of substrates is unclear. Through the use of mouse genetics, imaging and quantitative proteomics we uncover that ZMYND10 is a novel co-chaperone that confers specificity for the FKBP8-HSP90 chaperone complex towards axonemal dynein clients required for cilia motility. Loss of ZMYND10 perturbs the chaperoning of axonemal dynein heavy chains, triggering broader degradation of dynein motor subunits. We show that pharmacological inhibition of FKBP8 phenocopies dynein motor instability associated with the loss of ZMYND10 in airway cells and that human disease-causing variants of ZMYND10 disrupt its ability to act as an FKBP8-HSP90 co-chaperone. Our study indicates that Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), caused by mutations in dynein assembly factors disrupting cytoplasmic pre-assembly of axonemal dynein motors, should be considered a cell-type specific protein-misfolding disease.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited and is available on the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD006849.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Girish R Mali

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Patricia L Yeyati

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Seiya Mizuno

    Laboratory Animal Resource Centre, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Daniel O Dodd

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peter A Tennant

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Margaret A Keighren

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Petra zur Lage

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Amelia Shoemark

    Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Amaya Garcia-Munoz

    System Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Atsuko Shimada

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hiroyuki Takeda

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Frank Edlich

    Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Satoru Takahashi

    Laboratory Animal Resource Centre, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Alex von Kreisheim

    Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Andrew Paul Jarman

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4036-5701
  16. Pleasantine Mill

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Pleasantine.Mill@igmm.ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5218-134X

Funding

Medical Research Council (MRC_UU_12018/26)

  • Girish R Mali
  • Patricia L Yeyati
  • Daniel O Dodd
  • Peter A Tennant
  • Margaret A Keighren
  • Pleasantine Mill

Science Foundation Ireland

  • Amaya Garcia-Munoz
  • Alex von Kreisheim

Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland

  • Girish R Mali
  • Andrew Paul Jarman
  • Pleasantine Mill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work was approved by a University of Edinburgh internal ethics committee and was performed in accordance with institutional guidelines under license by the UK Home Office (PPL 60/4424). Mice were maintained in an SPF environment in facilities of the University of Edinburgh (PEL 60/2605).

Copyright

© 2018, Mali et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,151
    views
  • 428
    downloads
  • 47
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Girish R Mali
  2. Patricia L Yeyati
  3. Seiya Mizuno
  4. Daniel O Dodd
  5. Peter A Tennant
  6. Margaret A Keighren
  7. Petra zur Lage
  8. Amelia Shoemark
  9. Amaya Garcia-Munoz
  10. Atsuko Shimada
  11. Hiroyuki Takeda
  12. Frank Edlich
  13. Satoru Takahashi
  14. Alex von Kreisheim
  15. Andrew Paul Jarman
  16. Pleasantine Mill
(2018)
ZMYND10 functions in a chaperone relay during axonemal dynein assembly
eLife 7:e34389.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34389

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34389

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Joan Chang, Adam Pickard ... Karl E Kadler
    Research Article

    Collagen-I fibrillogenesis is crucial to health and development, where dysregulation is a hallmark of fibroproliferative diseases. Here, we show that collagen-I fibril assembly required a functional endocytic system that recycles collagen-I to assemble new fibrils. Endogenous collagen production was not required for fibrillogenesis if exogenous collagen was available, but the circadian-regulated vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) 33b and collagen-binding integrin α11 subunit were crucial to fibrillogenesis. Cells lacking VPS33B secrete soluble collagen-I protomers but were deficient in fibril formation, thus secretion and assembly are separately controlled. Overexpression of VPS33B led to loss of fibril rhythmicity and overabundance of fibrils, which was mediated through integrin α11β1. Endocytic recycling of collagen-I was enhanced in human fibroblasts isolated from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, where VPS33B and integrin α11 subunit were overexpressed at the fibrogenic front; this correlation between VPS33B, integrin α11 subunit, and abnormal collagen deposition was also observed in samples from patients with chronic skin wounds. In conclusion, our study showed that circadian-regulated endocytic recycling is central to homeostatic assembly of collagen fibrils and is disrupted in diseases.

    1. Cell Biology
    Chun-Wei Chen, Jeffery B Chavez ... Bruce J Nicholson
    Research Article Updated

    Endometriosis is a debilitating disease affecting 190 million women worldwide and the greatest single contributor to infertility. The most broadly accepted etiology is that uterine endometrial cells retrogradely enter the peritoneum during menses, and implant and form invasive lesions in a process analogous to cancer metastasis. However, over 90% of women suffer retrograde menstruation, but only 10% develop endometriosis, and debate continues as to whether the underlying defect is endometrial or peritoneal. Processes implicated in invasion include: enhanced motility; adhesion to, and formation of gap junctions with, the target tissue. Endometrial stromal (ESCs) from 22 endometriosis patients at different disease stages show much greater invasiveness across mesothelial (or endothelial) monolayers than ESCs from 22 control subjects, which is further enhanced by the presence of EECs. This is due to the enhanced responsiveness of endometriosis ESCs to the mesothelium, which induces migration and gap junction coupling. ESC-PMC gap junction coupling is shown to be required for invasion, while coupling between PMCs enhances mesothelial barrier breakdown.