Translational control of ERK signaling through miRNA/4EHP-directed silencing

  1. Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad
  2. Clément Chapat
  3. Edna Matta-Camacho
  4. Idit Anna Gelbart
  5. Geoffrey G Hesketh
  6. Meztli Arguello
  7. Aitor Garzia
  8. Sung-Hoon Kim
  9. Jan Attig
  10. Maayan Shapiro
  11. Masahiro Morita
  12. Arkady Khoutorsky
  13. Tommy Alain
  14. Christos Gkogkas
  15. Noam Stern-Ginossar
  16. Thomas Tuschl
  17. Anne-Claude Gingras
  18. Thomas F Duchaine  Is a corresponding author
  19. Nahum Sonenberg  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada
  2. Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  3. Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Canada
  4. The Rockefeller University, United States
  5. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  6. University of Ottawa, Canada
  7. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exert a broad influence over gene expression by directing effector activities that impinge on translation and stability of mRNAs. We recently discovered that the cap-binding protein 4EHP is a key component of the mammalian miRNA-Induced Silencing Complex (miRISC), which mediates gene silencing. However, little is known about the mRNA repertoire that is controlled by the 4EHP/miRNA mechanism or its biological importance. Here, using ribosome profiling, we identify a subset of mRNAs that are translationally controlled by 4EHP. We show that the Dusp6 mRNA, which encodes an ERK1/2 phosphatase, is translationally repressed by 4EHP and a specific miRNA, miR-145. This promotes ERK1/2 phosphorylation, resulting in augmented cell growth and reduced apoptosis. Our findings thus empirically define the integral role of translational repression in miRNA-induced gene silencing and reveal a critical function for this process in the control of the ERK signalling cascade in mammalian cells.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Clément Chapat

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Edna Matta-Camacho

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Idit Anna Gelbart

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Geoffrey G Hesketh

    Centre for Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Meztli Arguello

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Aitor Garzia

    Laboratory for RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Sung-Hoon Kim

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Jan Attig

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2159-2880
  10. Maayan Shapiro

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Masahiro Morita

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Arkady Khoutorsky

    Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Tommy Alain

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Christos Gkogkas

    Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6281-3419
  15. Noam Stern-Ginossar

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3583-5932
  16. Thomas Tuschl

    Laboratory for RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Anne-Claude Gingras

    Centre for Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Thomas F Duchaine

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    thomas.duchaine@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Nahum Sonenberg

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    nahum.sonenberg@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    Nahum Sonenberg, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4707-8759

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-148423)

  • Nahum Sonenberg

Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec

  • Thomas F Duchaine

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2014-06434)

  • Anne-Claude Gingras

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-143301)

  • Anne-Claude Gingras

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-123352)

  • Thomas F Duchaine

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Jafarnejad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,495
    views
  • 613
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad
  2. Clément Chapat
  3. Edna Matta-Camacho
  4. Idit Anna Gelbart
  5. Geoffrey G Hesketh
  6. Meztli Arguello
  7. Aitor Garzia
  8. Sung-Hoon Kim
  9. Jan Attig
  10. Maayan Shapiro
  11. Masahiro Morita
  12. Arkady Khoutorsky
  13. Tommy Alain
  14. Christos Gkogkas
  15. Noam Stern-Ginossar
  16. Thomas Tuschl
  17. Anne-Claude Gingras
  18. Thomas F Duchaine
  19. Nahum Sonenberg
(2018)
Translational control of ERK signaling through miRNA/4EHP-directed silencing
eLife 7:e35034.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35034

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35034

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.