Intermediate Filaments: The sweet side of vimentin
A protein modification called O-linked glycosylation regulates the interactions between vimentin molecules under normal conditions, and the ability of Chlamydia bacteria to replicate after they infect cells.
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
- Yonsei University, Republic of Korea
- University of Michigan Medical School, United States
The cytoskeleton is a critical cellular structure that is formed by three distinct protein networks: microtubules, which are involved in intracellular transport; actin filaments, which are involved in cell motility; and intermediate filaments, which provide structural and mechanical support (Pegoraro et al., 2017). Although intermediate filaments are the least studied of the three, more than 80 tissue-specific human diseases are known to be associated with mutations in intermediate filament genes (http://www.interfil.org).
The networks formed by intermediate filaments are highly dynamic and individual filaments also undergo constant remodeling (Robert et al., 2016). Moreover, various post-translational modifications of the filaments, such as phosphorylation and glycosylation, play key roles in regulating their dynamics (Snider and Omary, 2014). A particularly important modification for intermediate filaments is O-linked glycosylation (Hart et al., 2007), which involves the addition of a sugar-like molecule called GlcNAc (short for N-acetylglucosamine) to specific serine (Ser) or threonine (Thr) amino acid residues in multiple intermediate filament proteins, including vimentin (Slawson et al., 2008). However, there is much about O-linked glycosylation that is not well understood (Bond and Hanover, 2015).
Now, in eLife, Michael Boyce of Duke University School of Medicine and co-workers – including Heather Tarbet as first author – report on the role of O-linked glycosylation in the formation of vimentin intermediate filaments (Tarbet et al., 2018). They also shed light on the process by which Chlamydia trachomatis bacteria 'hijack' vimentin molecules to form a cage and stabilize the cytoplasmic vacuoles in which they replicate.
A vimentin molecule, like all other intermediate filament proteins, has three domains (Figure 1), and it is known that the head domain contains several amino acids that are sites for both glycosylation and phosphorylation (Izawa and Inagaki, 2006; Slawson et al., 2008; Snider and Omary, 2014). To form an intermediate filament, vimentin molecules first form dimers which then assemble to form tetramers that then associate laterally and longitudinally to assemble into mature 10nm-wide filaments of varying lengths. Tarbet et al. studied how three post-translational modification sites might be involved in the interactions between vimentin molecules. Two of these sites, Ser34 and Ser39 (numbering is inclusive of methionine at position 1), are known to be sites for both phosphorylation and glycosylation, whereas the third – Ser49 – is thought to be a site for glycosylation, but not for phosphorylation.
Figure 1
Glycosylation of a serine residue in the ‘head’ domain of vimentin promotes interactions between vimentin molecules.
A vimentin molecule has three domains: the head, the rod (which is α-helical), and the tail. Tarbet et al. show that the glycosylation of the Ser49 residue in the head domain (indicated by the addition of the yellow square) promotes the formation of vimentin dimers; the glycosylation of Ser34 (not shown) also promotes dimer formation, but to a lesser extent. While the exact details of the dimer formation process remain to be clarified, biochemical evidence suggests that glycosylation mediates interactions between the head domain of one vimentin molecule and either the head or rod domain of a second vimentin molecule, or with assembled vimentin filaments.
Tarbet et al. showed that replacing Ser34, but not Ser39, with the amino acid alanine reduced O-GlcNAc-mediated crosslinking between vimentin molecules, and that replacing Ser49 with alanine molecules completely prevented vimentin crosslinking, whereas mutations at several other amino acids did not have a measurable effect. This represents the first evidence that O-linked glycosylation can modulate interactions between vimentin molecules, and the work was enabled by a recently established chemical labeling technique to identify O-GlcNAc targets (Yu et al., 2012).
Tarbet et al. then focused on Ser49 because it was not a known phosphorylation site: replacing this serine with either alanine (which cannot undergo phosphorylation) or with aspartic acid (which has charge properties that resemble a permanently phosphorylated serine) resulted in disrupted vimentin structures, rather than extended filaments that are usually formed. This suggests that the inability of these two mutants to form filaments is due to the loss of glycosylation or possibly, in the case of the aspartic acid mutant, due to there being a permanent phosphorylation-like state at Ser49.
Importantly, Tarbet et al. extended their findings to demonstrate that the glycosylation of Ser49 is critical for vimentin-dependent cell migration and for the replication of the bacteria Chlamydia inside cells after infection. When Chlamydia infects a normal cell it takes over the cell, forcing vimentin molecules to form cages that protect and separate the bacteria from the host cytoplasm as it replicates. However, in the presence of a glycosylation inhibitor, or when Ser49 has been made non-glycosylatable, this 'hijacking' process is reduced significantly.
A few caveats deserve mention. First, the possibility that some of the results reported are due to indirect effects of the Ser49 mutation have not been completely excluded. Second, there is some confusion about Ser49 and phosphorylation: although the PhosphoNET database reports that Ser49 is phosphorylated in vimentin, the citation for this actually corresponds to Ser51, which is known to be a phosphorylation site (Izawa and Inagaki, 2006). However, several proteomic studies in the PhosphoSitePlus database report that Ser49 on human vimentin is a phospho-site, but these reports require detailed validation.
One surprising finding was that a mutation at a single glycosylation site (Ser49) had such a disruptive effect on vimentin filament formation, whereas the simultaneous mutation of all three major glycosylation sites on another intermediate filament protein, keratin 18, did not have a comparable impact (Ku and Omary, 1995). This could be because keratin 18 forms heterodimers (with keratin 8), so the impact is buffered by the partner keratin, whereas vimentin molecules form homodimers with other vimentin molecules.
Further experiments are needed to fully understand the assembly of intermediate filaments in vivo, including the role that 'cross-talk' between glycosylation and phosphorylation plays, but the findings of Tarbet et al. have illuminated an important aspect of the process.
References
-
A little sugar goes a long way: the cell biology of O-GlcNAcJournal of Cell Biology 208:869–880.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201501101
-
Identification and mutational analysis of the glycosylation sites of human keratin 18Journal of Biological Chemistry 270:11820–11827.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.20.11820
-
Mechanical Properties of the Cytoskeleton and CellsCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 9:a022038.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022038
-
A mitotic GlcNAcylation/phosphorylation signaling complex alters the posttranslational state of the cytoskeletal protein vimentinMolecular Biology of the Cell 19:4130–4140.https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1146
-
Post-translational modifications of intermediate filament proteins: mechanisms and functionsNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 15:163–177.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3753
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2018, Snider et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,231
- views
-
- 224
- downloads
-
- 17
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Intermediate Filaments: The sweet side of vimentin
eLife 7:e35336.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35336
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.
