Spinal Cord Injury: Is the vagus nerve our neural connectome?
What are the implications of the vagus nerve being able to mediate the time-dependent plasticity of an array of sensorimotor networks?.
- University of California, Los Angeles, United States
The vagus nerve reports on the state of many of the organs in our body, including the heart, the lungs and the gut, and it relays this information to various neural control networks that unconsciously regulate internal organs. It has also been shown that artificial electric stimulation of the vagus nerve helps with recovery in animal models of stroke, tinnitus and spinal cord injury (De Ridder et al., 2014; Hays, 2016). In particular, stimulation of the vagus nerve promotes the recuperation of motor skills and, maybe, autonomic functions (such as breathing), even when the injuries took place years before the intervention. However, we do not fully understand how stimulating this single nerve can lead to such results.
Now, in eLife, Patrick Ganzer, Robert Rennaker at the University of Texas at Dallas and the Texas Biomedical Device Center, and colleagues, report that stimulating the vagus nerve of a rat with spinal injuries helps it to recover mobility of an affected limb – in this case, its front paw (Ganzer et al., 2018). The stimulation has to be applied during a short time window after the rat manages to perform a specific movement with this paw, such as grasping a lever with a specific level of strength.
In this scenario, grasping the lever activates a network of neurons. The connections between these neurons will then be reinforced if the vagus nerve is stimulated within seconds of this task being completed (Figure 1). Classical long-term potentiation experiments show that simultaneous activation leaves ‘tags’ in neurons, which help to strengthen any connections between these neurons (He et al., 2015). Yet, during vagus nerve stimulation, there is no direct synaptic link between the circuits that perform the motor task and the synapses that are excited by the vagus nerve (Alvarez-Dieppa et al., 2016; Hulsey et al., 2017).
Figure 1
The effects of vagus nerve and spinal cord stimulations on neural networks.
The schematic shows the effect of two types of artificial stimulations on a network of neurons (circles), which is activated when a rat with spinal cord injury pulls a lever with its affected limb. Column A shows the effect of vagus nerve stimulation on neural networks that are activated when the rat pulls that lever. In A1, when the rat performs the task, it activates neurons. Some of these are specific to this task (encircled by solid black lines), some of which are not (dashed black line). In A2, the vagus nerve (not represented) is stimulated (pink cloud and lightning bolts). The neurons previously activated are also modulated by this stimulation, and certain new neurons are activated (dashed red line). This combination of activation and modulation strengthens the connections between the neurons that previously fired together, which leads to a transformation of the network. Ultimately, this more robust network supports better physical performance by the rats. Column B shows the effect of spinal cord stimulation on the same neural networks. In B1, spinal cord stimulation is applied (blue cloud and lighting bolt) before the task takes place. When the task is performed (B2), the synapses between the groups of neurons that are involved are further reinforced, a result that is comparable to what is obtained with vagus nerve stimulation. Similar results may also be obtained by performing the stimulation during the task itself. Both vagus nerve and spinal cord stimulations depend on the subject performing a certain task that activates the networks which need reinforcing. However, how these two types of stimulations differ, and how they modulate neural connections, remains unclear.
IMAGE CREDITS: Figure courtesy of V Reggie Edgerton.
Instead, the effects of vagus nerve stimulation could be mediated by a wide range of neuromodulatory mechanisms, which are non-specific to a given synapse. Because the vagus nerve is connected to so many different organs, both in sensorimotor and autonomic ways, it provides the entry point to various neuroendocrine and neurotransmitter systems. Essentially, it seems that the vagus nerve can form a 'connectome' for many functions, which means that interventions via the vagus nerve have the potential to help with the recovery of multiple functions.
Remarkably, similar effects can be obtained by stimulating the spinal cord before the action is performed (Figure 1; Gad et al., 2013). In both cases, there are activity-dependent mechanisms that identify the synapses that have been activated, and the stimulation triggers a series of time-dependent events that reinforce the connections between the relevant neurons.
More broadly, there are at least four fundamental biological concepts relevant to the findings by Ganzer et al. First, the vagus nerve mediates physiological systems (including sensorimotor and autonomic systems) which are extensively and comprehensively integrated together. Second, these systems are dynamic and can reorganize and interact in ways that can dramatically change our behavior. Third, time-dependence has a central role in defining activity-dependent plasticity. Fourth, the networks under the influence of the vagus nerve may be constantly reshaped by neural and biochemical signals via activity-dependent mechanisms.
These four points are consistent with the theory of neural group selection put forward by Gerald Edelman, the American biologist who shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1972 (Edelman, 1987). According to this theory, during early and neonatal development neurons form somewhat malleable connections based on genetic (i.e., internal) signals. Thereafter, throughout life, these networks dynamically and continuously create different combinations of functional neuronal connections – called neural networks, or somatically formed groups – by functionally pruning or reinforcing the strength of their connections. This remodeling is determined by the level of activity of the neural connections as they are constantly responding to internal and external stimuli. Finally, which neural groups fire together determines the overall shape of these networks. In terms of behavior, the basic functional unit of the brain is therefore not a neuron, but instead a group of connections among neurons that tend to fire together. Thus, fully understanding the mechanisms at play during vagus nerve stimulation requires thinking at the level of systems, as well as of subcellular components.
References
-
Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a case seriesNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 17:170–179.https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12127
-
Sub-threshold spinal cord stimulation facilitates spontaneous motor activity in spinal ratsJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 10:108.https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-108
-
Enhancing rehabilitative therapies with vagus nerve stimulationNeurotherapeutics 13:382–394.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-015-0417-z
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2018, Edgerton et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,509
- views
-
- 222
- downloads
-
- 8
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Spinal Cord Injury: Is the vagus nerve our neural connectome?
eLife 7:e35592.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35592
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Human-specific cognitive abilities depend on information processing in the cerebral cortex, where the neurons are significantly larger and their processes longer and sparser compared to rodents. We found that, in synaptically connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3 PCs), the delay in signal propagation from soma to soma is similar in humans and rodents. To compensate for the longer processes of neurons, membrane potential changes in human axons and/or dendrites must propagate faster. Axonal and dendritic recordings show that the propagation speed of action potentials (APs) is similar in human and rat axons, but the forward propagation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and the backward propagation of APs are 26 and 47% faster in human dendrites, respectively. Experimentally-based detailed biophysical models have shown that the key factor responsible for the accelerated EPSP propagation in human cortical dendrites is the large conductance load imposed at the soma by the large basal dendritic tree. Additionally, larger dendritic diameters and differences in cable and ion channel properties in humans contribute to enhanced signal propagation. Our integrative experimental and modeling study provides new insights into the scaling rules that help maintain information processing speed albeit the large and sparse neurons in the human cortex.
-
- Neuroscience
When holding visual information temporarily in working memory (WM), the neural representation of the memorandum is distributed across various cortical regions, including visual and frontal cortices. However, the role of stimulus representation in visual and frontal cortices during WM has been controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stimulus representation persists in the frontal cortex to facilitate flexible control demands in WM. During functional MRI, participants flexibly switched between simple WM maintenance of visual stimulus or more complex rule-based categorization of maintained stimulus on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results demonstrated enhanced stimulus representation in the frontal cortex that tracked demands for active WM control and enhanced stimulus representation in the visual cortex that tracked demands for precise WM maintenance. This differential frontal stimulus representation traded off with the newly-generated category representation with varying control demands. Simulation using multi-module recurrent neural networks replicated human neural patterns when stimulus information was preserved for network readout. Altogether, these findings help reconcile the long-standing debate in WM research, and provide empirical and computational evidence that flexible stimulus representation in the frontal cortex during WM serves as a potential neural coding scheme to accommodate the ever-changing environment.
