A positive feedback-based mechanism for constriction rate acceleration during cytokinesis in C. elegans

  1. Renat N Khaliullin  Is a corresponding author
  2. Rebecca A Green
  3. Linda Z Shi
  4. J Sebastian Gomez-Cavazos
  5. Michael W Berns  Is a corresponding author
  6. Arshad Desai
  7. Karen Oegema  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Diego, United States

Abstract

To ensure timely cytokinesis, the equatorial actomyosin contractile ring constricts at a relatively constant rate despite its progressively decreasing size. Thus, the per-unit-length constriction rate increases as ring perimeter decreases. To understand this acceleration, we monitored cortical surface and ring component dynamics during the first cytokinesis of the C. elegans embryo. We found that, per-unit-length, the amount of ring components (myosin, anillin) and the constriction rate increase with parallel exponential kinetics. Quantitative analysis of cortical flow indicated that the cortex within the ring is compressed along the axis perpendicular to the ring, and the per-unit-length rate of cortical compression increases during constriction in proportion to ring myosin. We propose that positive feedback between ring myosin and compression-driven flow of cortex into the ring drives an exponential increase in the per-unit-length amount of ring myosin to maintain a high ring constriction rate and support this proposal with an analytical mathematical model.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Renat N Khaliullin

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    renatkh@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rebecca A Green

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Linda Z Shi

    Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Engineering in Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. J Sebastian Gomez-Cavazos

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael W Berns

    Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Engineering in Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    mwberns17@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Arshad Desai

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5410-1830
  7. Karen Oegema

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    koegema@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8515-7514

Funding

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

  • Arshad Desai
  • Karen Oegema

Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic

  • Michael W Berns

Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-08-1-0284)

  • Michael W Berns

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Renat N Khaliullin

National Institutes of Health (T32 CA067754)

  • J Sebastian Gomez-Cavazos

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mohan K Balasubramanian, University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: February 20, 2018
  2. Accepted: July 1, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 2, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 5, 2018 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: July 27, 2018 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2018, Khaliullin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,121
    Page views
  • 348
    Downloads
  • 32
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Renat N Khaliullin
  2. Rebecca A Green
  3. Linda Z Shi
  4. J Sebastian Gomez-Cavazos
  5. Michael W Berns
  6. Arshad Desai
  7. Karen Oegema
(2018)
A positive feedback-based mechanism for constriction rate acceleration during cytokinesis in C. elegans
eLife 7:e36073.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36073

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Qiangqiang Liu et al.
    Research Article Updated

    DBC1 has been characterized as a key regulator of physiological and pathophysiological activities, such as DNA damage, senescence, and tumorigenesis. However, the mechanism by which the functional stability of DBC1 is regulated has yet to be elucidated. Here, we report that the ubiquitination-mediated degradation of DBC1 is regulated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase SIAH2 and deubiquitinase OTUD5 under hypoxic stress. Mechanistically, hypoxia promoted DBC1 to interact with SIAH2 but not OTUD5, resulting in the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of DBC1 through the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. SIAH2 knockout inhibited tumor cell proliferation and migration, which could be rescued by double knockout of SIAH2/CCAR2. Human tissue microarray analysis further revealed that the SIAH2/DBC1 axis was responsible for tumor progression under hypoxic stress. These findings define a key role of the hypoxia-mediated SIAH2-DBC1 pathway in the progression of human breast cancer and provide novel insights into the metastatic mechanism of breast cancer.

    1. Cell Biology
    Gina M LoMastro et al.
    Research Article

    Multiciliated cells (MCCs) are terminally differentiated epithelia that assemble multiple motile cilia used to promote fluid flow. To template these cilia, MCCs dramatically expand their centriole content during a process known as centriole amplification. In cycling cells, the master regulator of centriole assembly Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) is essential for centriole duplication; however recent work has questioned the role of PLK4 in centriole assembly in MCCs. To address this discrepancy, we created genetically engineered mouse models and demonstrated that both PLK4 protein and kinase activity are critical for centriole amplification in MCCs. Tracheal epithelial cells that fail centriole amplification accumulate large assemblies of centriole proteins and do not undergo apical surface area expansion. These results show that the initial stages of centriole assembly are conserved between cycling cells and MCCs and suggest that centriole amplification and surface area expansion are coordinated events.