Focal optogenetic suppression in macaque area MT biases direction discrimination and decision confidence, but only transiently

  1. Christopher R Fetsch  Is a corresponding author
  2. Naomi N Odean
  3. Danique Jeurissen
  4. Yasmine El-Shamayleh
  5. Greg Horwitz
  6. Michael N Shadlen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States
  3. University of Washington, United States

Abstract

Insights from causal manipulations of brain activity depend on targeting the spatial and temporal scales most relevant for behavior. Using a sensitive perceptual decision task in monkeys, we examined the effects of rapid, reversible inactivation on a spatial scale previously achieved only with electrical microstimulation. Inactivating neurons in area MT with consistent direction tuning produced systematic effects on choice and confidence. Behavioral effects were attenuated over the course of each session, suggesting compensatory adjustments in the downstream readout of MT over tens of minutes. Compensation also occurred on a sub-second time scale: behavior was largely unaffected when the visual stimulus (and concurrent suppression) lasted longer than 350 ms. These trends were similar for choice and confidence, consistent with the idea of a common mechanism underlying both measures. The findings demonstrate the utility of hyperpolarizing opsins for linking neural population activity at fine spatial and temporal scales to cognitive functions in primates.

Data availability

Matlab code (m-files) and data (.mat files) have been provided for Figure 1 and Figures 3-7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christopher R Fetsch

    Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Solomon H Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    cfetsch@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7921-8306
  2. Naomi N Odean

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Danique Jeurissen

    Kavli Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3835-5977
  4. Yasmine El-Shamayleh

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5396-2823
  5. Greg Horwitz

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael N Shadlen

    Kavli Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    shadlen@columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2002-2210

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Christopher R Fetsch
  • Naomi N Odean
  • Danique Jeurissen
  • Michael N Shadlen

National Eye Institute (EY11378)

  • Christopher R Fetsch
  • Naomi N Odean
  • Danique Jeurissen
  • Michael N Shadlen

National Eye Institute (EY018849)

  • Yasmine El-Shamayleh
  • Greg Horwitz

Simons Foundation (Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Danique Jeurissen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ranulfo Romo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The animals were handled according to an approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#AAAN4900) of Columbia University. Surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia in aseptic conditions, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: March 9, 2018
  2. Accepted: July 12, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 27, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 10, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Fetsch et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,535
    views
  • 632
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher R Fetsch
  2. Naomi N Odean
  3. Danique Jeurissen
  4. Yasmine El-Shamayleh
  5. Greg Horwitz
  6. Michael N Shadlen
(2018)
Focal optogenetic suppression in macaque area MT biases direction discrimination and decision confidence, but only transiently
eLife 7:e36523.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36523

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36523

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aedan Yue Li, Natalia Ladyka-Wojcik ... Morgan Barense
    Research Article

    Combining information from multiple senses is essential to object recognition, core to the ability to learn concepts, make new inferences, and generalize across distinct entities. Yet how the mind combines sensory input into coherent crossmodal representations - the crossmodal binding problem - remains poorly understood. Here, we applied multi-echo fMRI across a four-day paradigm, in which participants learned 3-dimensional crossmodal representations created from well-characterized unimodal visual shape and sound features. Our novel paradigm decoupled the learned crossmodal object representations from their baseline unimodal shapes and sounds, thus allowing us to track the emergence of crossmodal object representations as they were learned by healthy adults. Critically, we found that two anterior temporal lobe structures - temporal pole and perirhinal cortex - differentiated learned from non-learned crossmodal objects, even when controlling for the unimodal features that composed those objects. These results provide evidence for integrated crossmodal object representations in the anterior temporal lobes that were different from the representations for the unimodal features. Furthermore, we found that perirhinal cortex representations were by default biased towards visual shape, but this initial visual bias was attenuated by crossmodal learning. Thus, crossmodal learning transformed perirhinal representations such that they were no longer predominantly grounded in the visual modality, which may be a mechanism by which object concepts gain their abstraction.