1. Genetics and Genomics
  2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Download icon

Neolithic and Medieval virus genomes reveal complex evolution of Hepatitis B

  1. Ben Krause-Kyora  Is a corresponding author
  2. Julian Susat
  3. Felix M Key
  4. Denise Kühnert
  5. Esther Bosse
  6. Alexander Immel
  7. Christoph Rinne
  8. Sabin-Christin Kornell
  9. Diego Yepes
  10. Sören Franzenburg
  11. Henrike O Heyne
  12. Thomas Meier
  13. Sandra Lösch
  14. Harald Meller
  15. Susanne Friederich
  16. Nicole Nicklisch
  17. Kurt W Alt
  18. Stefan Schreiber
  19. Andreas Tholey
  20. Alexander Herbig
  21. Almut Nebel
  22. Johannes Krause  Is a corresponding author
  1. Kiel University, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Germany
  3. University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Broad Institute, United States
  5. Heidelberg University, Germany
  6. University of Bern, Switzerland
  7. State Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt and State Museum of Prehistory, Germany
Short Report
  • Cited 34
  • Views 4,491
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e36666 doi: 10.7554/eLife.36666

Abstract

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most widespread human pathogens known today, yet its origin and evolutionary history are still unclear and controversial. Here, we report the analysis of three ancient HBV genomes recovered from human skeletons found at three different archaeological sites in Germany. We reconstructed two Neolithic and one medieval HBV genomes by de novo assembly from shotgun DNA sequencing data. Additionally, we observed HBV-specific peptides using paleo-proteomics. Our results show that HBV circulates in the European population for at least 7000 years. The Neolithic HBV genomes show a high genomic similarity to each other. In a phylogenetic network, they do not group with any human-associated HBV genome and are most closely related to those infecting African non-human primates. These ancient virus forms appear to represent distinct lineages that have no close relatives today and possibly went extinct. Our results reveal the great potential of ancient DNA from human skeletons in order to study the long-time evolution of blood borne viruses.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ben Krause-Kyora

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    For correspondence
    b.krause-kyora@ikmb.uni-kiel.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9435-2872
  2. Julian Susat

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Felix M Key

    Department of Archeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2812-6636
  4. Denise Kühnert

    Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Esther Bosse

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alexander Immel

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christoph Rinne

    Institute of Pre- and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sabin-Christin Kornell

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Diego Yepes

    Systematic Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Institute for Experimental Medicine, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sören Franzenburg

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Henrike O Heyne

    Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Thomas Meier

    Institute for Pre- and Protohistory and Near Eastern Archaeology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Sandra Lösch

    Department of Physical Anthropology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Harald Meller

    State Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt and State Museum of Prehistory, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Susanne Friederich

    State Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt and State Museum of Prehistory, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Nicole Nicklisch

    State Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt and State Museum of Prehistory, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Kurt W Alt

    State Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt and State Museum of Prehistory, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Stefan Schreiber

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Andreas Tholey

    Systematic Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Institute for Experimental Medicine, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Alexander Herbig

    Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Almut Nebel

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Johannes Krause

    Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
    For correspondence
    krause@shh.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9144-3920

Funding

European Research Council (APGREID)

  • Johannes Krause

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Al 287-7-1)

  • Kurt W Alt

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Me 3245/1-1)

  • Harald Meller

Collaborative Research Center (1266)

  • Ben Krause-Kyora

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Our human remains used are prehistoric European specimens. No consent from them can be required. No decedent groups claim responsibility or ancestry to those people.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen Locarnini, Doherty Institute, Australia

Publication history

  1. Received: March 14, 2018
  2. Accepted: May 9, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 10, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 19, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Krause-Kyora et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,491
    Page views
  • 720
    Downloads
  • 34
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Nikolay P Kandul et al.
    Research Article

    Homing based gene drives, engineered using CRISPR/Cas9, have been proposed to spread desirable genes throughout populations. However, invasion of such drives can be hindered by the accumulation of resistant alleles. To limit this obstacle, we engineer a confinable population modification Home-and-Rescue (HomeR) drive in Drosophila targeting an essential gene. In our experiments, resistant alleles that disrupt the target gene function were recessive lethal, and therefore disadvantaged. We demonstrate that HomeR can achieve an increase in frequency in population cage experiments, but that fitness costs due to the Cas9 insertion limit drive efficacy. Finally, we conduct mathematical modeling comparing HomeR to contemporary gene drive architectures for population modification over wide ranges of fitness costs, transmission rates, and release regimens. HomeR could potentially be adapted to other species, as a means for safe, confinable, modification of wild populations.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Cesar P Canales et al.
    Research Article

    In utero exposure to maternal immune activation (MIA) is an environmental risk factor for neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Animal models provide an opportunity to identify mechanisms driving neuropathology associated with MIA. We performed time course transcriptional profiling of mouse cortical development following induced MIA via poly(I:C) injection at E12.5. MIA-driven transcriptional changes were validated via protein analysis, and parallel perturbations to cortical neuroanatomy were identified via imaging. MIA-induced acute upregulation of genes associated with hypoxia, immune signaling, and angiogenesis, by six hours following exposure. This acute response was followed by changes in proliferation, neuronal and glial specification, and cortical lamination that emerged at E14.5 and peaked at E17.5. Decreased numbers of proliferative cells in germinal zones and alterations in neuronal and glial populations were identified in the MIA-exposed cortex. Overall, paired transcriptomic and neuroanatomical characterization revealed a sequence of perturbations to corticogenesis driven by mid-gestational MIA.