A discriminator code–based DTD surveillance ensures faithful glycine delivery for protein biosynthesis in bacteria

Abstract

D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase (DTD) acts on achiral glycine, in addition to D-amino acids, attached to tRNA. We have recently shown that this activity enables DTD to clear non-cognate Gly-tRNAAla with 1000-fold higher efficiency than its activity on Gly-tRNAGly, indicating tRNA-based modulation of DTD (Pawar et al., 2017). Here, we show that tRNA's discriminator base predominantly accounts for this activity difference and is the key to selection by DTD. Accordingly, the uracil discriminator base, serving as a negative determinant, prevents Gly-tRNAGly misediting by DTD and this protection is augmented by EF-Tu. Intriguingly, eukaryotic DTD has inverted discriminator base specificity and uses only G3•U70 for tRNAGly/Ala discrimination. Moreover, DTD prevents alanine-to-glycine misincorporation in proteins rather than only recycling mischarged tRNAAla. Overall, the study reveals the unique co-evolution of DTD and discriminator base, and suggests DTD's strong selection pressure on bacterial tRNAGlys to retain a pyrimidine discriminator code.

Data availability

Biochemical data is available as a source data file. All other data are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Santosh Kumar Kuncha

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Katta Suma

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Komal Ishwar Pawar

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1968-9851
  4. Jotin Gogoi

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Satya Brata Routh

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sambhavi Pottabathini

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shobha P Kruparani

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rajan Sankaranarayanan

    CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    For correspondence
    sankar@ccmb.res.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4524-9953

Funding

Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (Centre of Excellence)

  • Rajan Sankaranarayanan

Science and Engineering Research Board (J. C. Bose Fellowship)

  • Rajan Sankaranarayanan

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DST-INSPIRE)

  • Santosh Kumar Kuncha

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jonathan P Staley, University of Chicago, United States

Version history

  1. Received: May 14, 2018
  2. Accepted: August 7, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 9, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 17, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Kuncha et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Santosh Kumar Kuncha
  2. Katta Suma
  3. Komal Ishwar Pawar
  4. Jotin Gogoi
  5. Satya Brata Routh
  6. Sambhavi Pottabathini
  7. Shobha P Kruparani
  8. Rajan Sankaranarayanan
(2018)
A discriminator code–based DTD surveillance ensures faithful glycine delivery for protein biosynthesis in bacteria
eLife 7:e38232.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38232

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38232

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.