New insights into the cellular temporal response to proteostatic stress

  1. Justin Rendleman
  2. Zhe Cheng
  3. Shuvadeep Maity
  4. Nicolai Kastelic
  5. Mathias Munschauer
  6. Kristina Allgoewer
  7. Guoshou Teo
  8. Yun Bin Matteo Zhang
  9. Amy Lei
  10. Brian Parker
  11. Markus Landthaler
  12. Lindsay Freeberg
  13. Scott Kuersten
  14. Hyungwon Choi
  15. Christine Vogel  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Germany
  3. Illumina, Inc, United States
  4. National University Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Maintaining a healthy proteome involves all layers of gene expression regulation. By quantifying temporal changes of the transcriptome, translatome, proteome, and RNA-protein interactome in cervical cancer cells, we systematically characterize the molecular landscape in response to proteostatic challenges. We identify shared and specific responses to misfolded proteins and to oxidative stress, two conditions that are tightly linked. We reveal new aspects of the unfolded protein response, including many genes that escape global translation shutdown. A subset of these genes supports rerouting of energy production in the mitochondria. We also find that many genes change at multiple levels, in either the same or opposing directions, and at different time points. We highlight a variety of putative regulatory pathways, including the stress-dependent alternative splicing of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, and protein-RNA binding within the 3' untranslated region of molecular chaperones. These results illustrate the potential of this information-rich resource.

Data availability

The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (Barrett et al., 2013; Edgar et al., 2002) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE113171. The mass spectrometry data including the MaxQuant output files have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Vizcaíno et al., 2016) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD008575.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Justin Rendleman

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8152-7127
  2. Zhe Cheng

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Shuvadeep Maity

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Nicolai Kastelic

    Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Mathias Munschauer

    Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Kristina Allgoewer

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Guoshou Teo

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Yun Bin Matteo Zhang

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Amy Lei

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Brian Parker

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Markus Landthaler

    Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Lindsay Freeberg

    Illumina, Inc, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    Lindsay Freeberg, affiliated with Illumina Inc. No other competing interests to declare.
  13. Scott Kuersten

    Illumina, Inc, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    Scott Kuersten, affiliated with Illumina Inc. No other competing interests to declare.
  14. Hyungwon Choi

    National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Christine Vogel

    Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    cvogel@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2856-3118

Funding

National Institutes of Health (1R01GM113237-01)

  • Justin Rendleman
  • Zhe Cheng
  • Shuvadeep Maity
  • Guoshou Teo
  • Christine Vogel

National Institutes of Health (1R35GM127089-01)

  • Justin Rendleman
  • Shuvadeep Maity
  • Christine Vogel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Rendleman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,336
    views
  • 1,114
    downloads
  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Justin Rendleman
  2. Zhe Cheng
  3. Shuvadeep Maity
  4. Nicolai Kastelic
  5. Mathias Munschauer
  6. Kristina Allgoewer
  7. Guoshou Teo
  8. Yun Bin Matteo Zhang
  9. Amy Lei
  10. Brian Parker
  11. Markus Landthaler
  12. Lindsay Freeberg
  13. Scott Kuersten
  14. Hyungwon Choi
  15. Christine Vogel
(2018)
New insights into the cellular temporal response to proteostatic stress
eLife 7:e39054.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39054

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39054

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.