Abstract

Cells constantly adapt to environmental fluctuations. These physiological changes require time and therefore cause a lag phase during which the cells do not function optimally. Interestingly, past exposure to an environmental condition can shorten the time needed to adapt when the condition re-occurs, even in daughter cells that never directly encountered the initial condition. Here, we use the molecular toolbox of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to systematically unravel the molecular mechanism underlying such history-dependent behavior in transitions between glucose and maltose. In contrast to previous hypotheses, the behavior does not depend on persistence of proteins involved in metabolism of a specific sugar. Instead, presence of glucose induces a gradual decline in the cells' ability to activate respiration, which is needed to metabolize alternative carbon sources. These results reveal how trans-generational transitions in central carbon metabolism generate history-dependent behavior in yeast, and provide a mechanistic framework for similar phenomena in other cell types.

Data availability

The RNA-seq and BAR-seq data-sets are deposited in GEO. The GEO accession number of BAR-Seq and RNA-Seq data are GSE116505 and GSE116246 respectively.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Cerulus B
    2. Jariani A
    (2018) BAR-Seq to study history-dependent behavior
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE116505).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bram Cerulus

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Abbas Jariani

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Gemma Perez-Samper

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Lieselotte Vermeersch

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5789-2220
  5. Julian M J Pietsch

    Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9992-2384
  6. Matthew M Crane

    Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Aaron M New

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Brigida Gallone

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Miguel Roncoroni

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    Miguel Roncoroni, This author had substantial contributions to acquisition of data and doing the experiments.
  10. Maria C Dzialo

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Sander K Govers

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0260-4054
  12. Jhana Hendrickx

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Eva Galle

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Maarten Coomans

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Pieter Berden

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Sara Verbandt

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Peter S Swain

    Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7489-8587
  18. Kevin J Verstrepen

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    kevin.verstrepen@kuleuven.vib.be
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3077-6219

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

  • Bram Cerulus
  • Lieselotte Vermeersch

Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

European Research Counsil (CoG682009)

  • Bram Cerulus
  • Abbas Jariani
  • Gemma Perez-Samper
  • Kevin J Verstrepen

Agentschap Innoveren & Ondernemen

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

AB-InBev-Baillet Latour Fund

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

Human Frontier Science Program (246 RGP0050/2013)

  • Abbas Jariani
  • Peter S Swain
  • Kevin J Verstrepen

SULSA Postdoctoral Exchange Scheme

  • Julian M J Pietsch

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Cerulus et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,081
    views
  • 914
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bram Cerulus
  2. Abbas Jariani
  3. Gemma Perez-Samper
  4. Lieselotte Vermeersch
  5. Julian M J Pietsch
  6. Matthew M Crane
  7. Aaron M New
  8. Brigida Gallone
  9. Miguel Roncoroni
  10. Maria C Dzialo
  11. Sander K Govers
  12. Jhana Hendrickx
  13. Eva Galle
  14. Maarten Coomans
  15. Pieter Berden
  16. Sara Verbandt
  17. Peter S Swain
  18. Kevin J Verstrepen
(2018)
Transition between fermentation and respiration determines history-dependent behavior in fluctuating carbon sources
eLife 7:e39234.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39234

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39234

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cesare V Parise, Marc O Ernst
    Research Article

    Audiovisual information reaches the brain via both sustained and transient input channels, representing signals’ intensity over time or changes thereof, respectively. To date, it is unclear to what extent transient and sustained input channels contribute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration. Based on the results of two novel psychophysical experiments, here we demonstrate the importance of the transient (instead of the sustained) channel for the integration of audiovisual signals. To account for the present results, we developed a biologically inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the multisensory correlation detectors, which combines correlated input from unimodal transient channels. Besides accounting for the results of our psychophysical experiments, this model could quantitatively replicate several recent findings in multisensory research, as tested against a large collection of published datasets. In particular, the model could simultaneously account for the perceived timing of audiovisual events, multisensory facilitation in detection tasks, causality judgments, and optimal integration. This study demonstrates that several phenomena in multisensory research that were previously considered unrelated, all stem from the integration of correlated input from unimodal transient channels.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Sarah De Beuckeleer, Tim Van De Looverbosch ... Winnok H De Vos
    Research Article

    Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is revolutionizing cell biology. However, the variability between individual iPSC lines and the lack of efficient technology to comprehensively characterize iPSC-derived cell types hinder its adoption in routine preclinical screening settings. To facilitate the validation of iPSC-derived cell culture composition, we have implemented an imaging assay based on cell painting and convolutional neural networks to recognize cell types in dense and mixed cultures with high fidelity. We have benchmarked our approach using pure and mixed cultures of neuroblastoma and astrocytoma cell lines and attained a classification accuracy above 96%. Through iterative data erosion, we found that inputs containing the nuclear region of interest and its close environment, allow achieving equally high classification accuracy as inputs containing the whole cell for semi-confluent cultures and preserved prediction accuracy even in very dense cultures. We then applied this regionally restricted cell profiling approach to evaluate the differentiation status of iPSC-derived neural cultures, by determining the ratio of postmitotic neurons and neural progenitors. We found that the cell-based prediction significantly outperformed an approach in which the population-level time in culture was used as a classification criterion (96% vs 86%, respectively). In mixed iPSC-derived neuronal cultures, microglia could be unequivocally discriminated from neurons, regardless of their reactivity state, and a tiered strategy allowed for further distinguishing activated from non-activated cell states, albeit with lower accuracy. Thus, morphological single-cell profiling provides a means to quantify cell composition in complex mixed neural cultures and holds promise for use in the quality control of iPSC-derived cell culture models.