RNA-Binding Proteins: A matter of balance
New analyses shift the view that some forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia are due to defects in a single RNA-binding protein.
- Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
- Mayo Clinic, United States
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a cruel disease where the death of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord causes loss of mobility, dexterity, speech, and the ability to swallow. ALS is ultimately fatal, usually within about three years of the onset of symptoms (Taylor et al., 2016). In another neurodegenerative disease, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), neurons from the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain die, leading to a range of cognitive and behavioral symptoms such as personality changes (Ling et al., 2013). The clinical overlap between ALS and FTD has become apparent in recent years: for example, clumps of an RNA-binding protein called TDP-43 build up in almost all cases of ALS and half of FTD cases (Neumann et al., 2006). In 2011, the discovery that a mutation in a gene called C9orf72 is the most common genetic cause of both ALS and FTD confirmed the connection between the diseases (DeJesus-Hernandez et al., 2011; Renton et al., 2011; ).
C9orf72 is a peculiar gene – its name literally stands for the 72nd open reading frame on chromosome 9 – and the disease-causing mutation is even stranger. One of the gene's introns normally contains between two and 23 repeats of a six-nucleotide segment (GGGGCC), but this number can rise to hundreds (or even thousands) in the mutant gene. This increase in repeat numbers could cause disease in several ways: the repeated segments could, for example, be transcribed into RNA molecules that soak up RNA-binding proteins and prevent these proteins from carrying out their functions (Gitler and Tsuiji, 2016).
Researchers have identified RNA-binding proteins that might be disrupted in this way. In a previous eLife paper, researchers at Columbia University reported that one of these proteins, called hnRNP H, attaches to the repeat RNA in C9orf72 and forms clumps within the nucleus. In patients with C9orf72 mutations, this binding hinders how the protein regulates alternative splicing, a mechanism where specific portions of mRNA are edited out or reshuffled (Conlon et al., 2016). Now, a collaboration between the Columbia team and researchers at the New York Genome Center – including Erin Conlon as first author and James Manley as corresponding author – reports a new and unexpected twist to the story (Conlon et al., 2018).
The team hoped to use the splicing defects they identified in the mRNA targets of hnRNP H to create a ‘signature’ that would help them identify which cases are caused by mutations in C9orf72. To begin, they studied 18 of these targets in 50 postmortem samples from the brains of people with ALS, FTD, or both. None of the patients harbored C9orf72 mutations, or any other known mutation. Unexpectedly, the mRNA sequences were still dysregulated in more than half of the samples: if there was no repeat RNA to trap hnRNP H, how could this be the case?
To answer this question, Conlon explored the solubility of hnRNP H in an effort to determine if it was sequestered or somewhat dysfunctional. The samples were split into two groups depending on whether they showed a splicing signature similar to the one present in C9orf72 mutation cases. The team found that hnRNP H was twice as insoluble in the group with the splicing signature compared to the samples without these RNA splicing defects. What drives this insolubility when the mutations in C9orf72 are absent?
Conlon et al. reasoned that hnRNP H could be corrupted by proteins with similar properties that had turned insoluble; and indeed, they discovered three other RNA-binding proteins which had become less soluble. They then turned their attention to one of these proteins, TDP-43, whose loss had been studied before (Polymenidou et al., 2011; Tollervey et al., 2011). This protein was distributed similarly in the brains of all the patients: in other words, histopathology (or looking at the samples under the microscope) was unable to distinguish between the two groups. However, when measuring the mRNA targets of TDP-43, it appeared that TDP-43 had lost much more of its function in the samples with the splicing signature that matches the C9orf72 mutation carriers. The insolubility of TDP-43 (how it behaves biochemically) was therefore more important to identify the two groups.
Collectively, these findings support the idea that the splicing defects found in ALS and FTD appear when any of several RNA-binding proteins becomes insoluble. As such, Conlon et al. infer that we should reconsider how we view these conditions, and move away from the idea that they are simply TDP-43 diseases. Their model predicts the existence of an equilibrium between an array of RNA-binding proteins, each at a different concentration and in a physically distinct state. Even subtle mutations could change the concentration and the solubility of any of these proteins, which could tip the scale and culminate in various defects in RNA processing. Therapeutic interventions that reestablish the RNA-binding protein balance could significantly slow or stop the course of the diseases.
Figure 1
Maintaining the balance of RNA-binding proteins.
(A) RNA-binding proteins (red, green, orange, purple, and blue), such as TDP-43 (green), regulate various RNA processing pathways, like the alternative splicing of mRNA. Many of these proteins are also prone to aggregating and becoming insoluble. As represented by the seesaw, this means that their concentration, solubility, and interactions with proteins must be controlled to maintain balance in the cell (right). Under normal conditions, TDP-43 is soluble and is mainly localized in the nucleus of the cell. (B) A mutation in a gene called C9orf72 can result in a reduction in the solubility of an RNA-binding protein known as hnRNP H (purple). This can also lead to changes in the concentration and solubility of other RNA-binding proteins (including TDP-43), which disrupts alternative splicing and other processes in the cell. The reduction in the solubility of TDP-43 causes it to accumulate in the cytoplasm, which is a hallmark of ALS and FTD. (C) Other triggers, such as genetic and environmental factors, can change the concentration and solubility of RNA-binding proteins (unbalanced seesaw); this causes them to misfold, become insoluble and accumulate in the cytoplasm.
References
-
Characterizing the RNA targets and position-dependent splicing regulation by TDP-43Nature Neuroscience 14:452–458.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2778
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: August 21, 2018 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2018, Gitler et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,650
- views
-
- 329
- downloads
-
- 5
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
RNA-Binding Proteins: A matter of balance
eLife 7:e40034.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40034
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Plant Biology
Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Neuroscience
Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.
