Functionally defined white matter of the macaque monkey brain reveals a dorso-ventral attention network

  1. Ilaria Sani  Is a corresponding author
  2. Brent C McPherson
  3. Heiko Stemmann
  4. Franco Pestilli
  5. Winrich A Freiwald  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Rockefeller University, United States
  2. Indiana University, United States
  3. University of Bremen, Germany

Abstract

Classical studies of attention have identified areas of parietal and frontal cortex as sources of attentional control. Recently, a ventral region in the macaque temporal cortex, the posterior infero-temporal dorsal area PITd, has been suggested as a third attentional control area. This raises the question of whether and how spatially distant areas coordinate a joint focus of attention. Here we tested the hypothesis that parieto-frontal attention areas and PITd are directly interconnected. By combining functional MRI with ex-vivo high-resolution diffusion MRI, we found that PITd and dorsal attention areas are all directly connected through three specific fascicles. These results ascribe a new function, the communication of attention signals, to two known fiber-bundles, highlight the importance of vertical interactions across the two visual streams, and imply that the control of endogenous attention, hitherto thought to reside in macaque dorsal cortical areas, is exerted by a dorso-ventral network.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data for Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, have been made available via the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8ks5t/).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ilaria Sani

    Laboratory of Neural Systems, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    isani01@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4389-7263
  2. Brent C McPherson

    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Heiko Stemmann

    Institute for Brain Research and Center for Advanced Imaging, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Franco Pestilli

    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2469-0494
  5. Winrich A Freiwald

    Laboratory of Neural Systems, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    wfreiwald@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8456-5030

Funding

Leon Levy Foundation (https://leonlevyfoundation.org/leon-levy-fellowship-neuroscience)

  • Ilaria Sani

National Science Foundation (BCS-1734853)

  • Franco Pestilli

New York Stem Cell Foundation (https://nyscf.org)

  • Winrich A Freiwald

National Science Foundation (BCS-1057006)

  • Winrich A Freiwald

National Institutes of Health (NIMH ULTTR001108)

  • Franco Pestilli

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (Passthrough)

  • Franco Pestilli

Microsoft Research (Azure Credits Award)

  • Franco Pestilli

Indiana University (Areas of Emergent Research initiative Learning: Brains-Machines-Children)

  • Franco Pestilli

National Institutes of Health (1U54MH091657)

  • Franco Pestilli

National Science Foundation (IIS-1636893)

  • Franco Pestilli

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Our Protocols protocol has been approved by The Rockefeller University, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. In vivo imaging procedures were performed at the Center for Advanced Imaging of Bremen University. They conformed to the National Institutes of Health Guide for Use and Care of Laboratory Animals, regulations for the welfare of experimental animals issued by the federal government of Germany,and stipulations of local Bremen authorities

Copyright

© 2019, Sani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,395
    views
  • 510
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40520

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lotfi Ferhat, Rabia Soussi ... Michel Khrestchatisky
    Research Article

    Preclinical and clinical studies show that mild to moderate hypothermia is neuroprotective in sudden cardiac arrest, ischemic stroke, perinatal hypoxia/ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and seizures. Induction of hypothermia largely involves physical cooling therapies, which induce several clinical complications, while some molecules have shown to be efficient in pharmacologically induced hypothermia (PIH). Neurotensin (NT), a 13 amino acid neuropeptide that regulates body temperature, interacts with various receptors to mediate its peripheral and central effects. NT induces PIH when administered intracerebrally. However, these effects are not observed if NT is administered peripherally, due to its rapid degradation and poor passage of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We conjugated NT to peptides that bind the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) to generate ‘vectorized’ forms of NT with enhanced BBB permeability. We evaluated their effects in epileptic conditions following peripheral administration. One of these conjugates, VH-N412, displayed improved stability, binding potential to both the LDLR and NTSR-1, rodent/human cross-reactivity and improved brain distribution. In a mouse model of kainate (KA)-induced status epilepticus (SE), VH-N412 elicited rapid hypothermia associated with anticonvulsant effects, potent neuroprotection, and reduced hippocampal inflammation. VH-N412 also reduced sprouting of the dentate gyrus mossy fibers and preserved learning and memory skills in the treated mice. In cultured hippocampal neurons, VH-N412 displayed temperature-independent neuroprotective properties. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing the successful treatment of SE with PIH. In all, our results show that vectorized NT may elicit different neuroprotection mechanisms mediated by hypothermia and/or by intrinsic neuroprotective properties.

    1. Neuroscience
    Simon Weiler, Manuel Teichert, Troy W Margrie
    Research Article

    The neocortex comprises anatomically discrete yet interconnected areas that are symmetrically located across the two hemispheres. Determining the logic of these macrocircuits is necessary for understanding high level brain function. Here in mice, we have mapped the areal and laminar organization of the ipsi- and contralateral cortical projection onto the primary visual, somatosensory, and motor cortices. We find that although the ipsilateral hemisphere is the primary source of cortical input, there is substantial contralateral symmetry regarding the relative contribution and areal identity of input. Laminar analysis of these input areas show that excitatory Layer 6 corticocortical cells (L6 CCs) are a major projection pathway within and between the two hemispheres. Analysis of the relative contribution of inputs from supra- (feedforward) and infragranular (feedback) layers reveals that contra-hemispheric projections reflect a dominant feedback organization compared to their ipsi-cortical counterpart. The magnitude of the interhemispheric difference in hierarchy was largest for sensory and motor projection areas compared to frontal, medial, or lateral brain areas due to a proportional increase in input from L6 neurons. L6 CCs therefore not only mediate long-range cortical communication but also reflect its inherent feedback organization.